Dear An actual biological woman, I am going to revert your previous reversion again and restore the origial article. The reason is as follows: while the sources the IP editor referred to indicate some ambiguity about the sexuality and name, we cannot be certain that the reasons are and how reliable they are. For one, the name "Dana" is from an unverifiable statement of the room neighbour and this is therefore not reliable. Küblböck apparently uploaded pictures dressed like a woman, however there is no indication whatsoever if this was due to a beginning transsexual transformation or some kind of transvestiate act or simply a play-form, an alter ego or such. The article also indicates that the ownership of that social media account is unconfirmed. As those sources are unclear, the Wikipedia article should not jump to conclusions, participate in speculations or turn speculation into fact. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 14:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:An_actual_biological_woman reported by User:Jake Brockman (Result: ). Thank you. pseudonym
Jake Brockman
talk
14:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
17:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)An actual biological woman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is my only account. Even if you claim something like "checkuser," I can confirm that this is the only account I've ever opened. An actual biological woman ( talk) 17:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirming that this is indeed a sock account bypassing a block. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An actual biological woman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #22954 was submitted on Oct 15, 2018 17:35:43. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 17:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
An actual biological woman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have never been a sock. I wouldn't be surprised if this is just a targeted attack.
Decline reason:
yes, you is. In reviewing your edits, it's pretty obvious to me, the most AGF admin reviewing unblocks, that you are socking. Even if I could overturn a WP:check user block, I would be disinclined to do so. Claiming malfeasance and crying "victim!' is not going to induce anyone to unblock you. Admit your other accounts and appeal on your original account, please.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 17:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dear An actual biological woman, I am going to revert your previous reversion again and restore the origial article. The reason is as follows: while the sources the IP editor referred to indicate some ambiguity about the sexuality and name, we cannot be certain that the reasons are and how reliable they are. For one, the name "Dana" is from an unverifiable statement of the room neighbour and this is therefore not reliable. Küblböck apparently uploaded pictures dressed like a woman, however there is no indication whatsoever if this was due to a beginning transsexual transformation or some kind of transvestiate act or simply a play-form, an alter ego or such. The article also indicates that the ownership of that social media account is unconfirmed. As those sources are unclear, the Wikipedia article should not jump to conclusions, participate in speculations or turn speculation into fact. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 14:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:An_actual_biological_woman reported by User:Jake Brockman (Result: ). Thank you. pseudonym
Jake Brockman
talk
14:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
17:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)An actual biological woman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is my only account. Even if you claim something like "checkuser," I can confirm that this is the only account I've ever opened. An actual biological woman ( talk) 17:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirming that this is indeed a sock account bypassing a block. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An actual biological woman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #22954 was submitted on Oct 15, 2018 17:35:43. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 17:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
An actual biological woman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have never been a sock. I wouldn't be surprised if this is just a targeted attack.
Decline reason:
yes, you is. In reviewing your edits, it's pretty obvious to me, the most AGF admin reviewing unblocks, that you are socking. Even if I could overturn a WP:check user block, I would be disinclined to do so. Claiming malfeasance and crying "victim!' is not going to induce anyone to unblock you. Admit your other accounts and appeal on your original account, please.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 17:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.