![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your undying dedication to this fantastic project, helping dozens of users requiring assistance on their installs, signing up scores of others, fixing hiccups in release 1.0 whilst still programming v. 1.01 and always with a smile! It's an honor to assist you, just wish I could do more... Congratulations my friend. - Gl e n T C 19:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For creating the best ever tool to fight vandals! Computerjoe 's talk 19:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
You are super silly and sensitive. Next time you want to act so calamorous, do it to someone else you goose. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.8.249.175 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC).
I hate you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.8.249.175 ( talk • contribs) .
On the Oren Patashnik article, this diff of your single action is the worst sort of unwikipedian half-assed job.
Obviously, some newbie tried to contribute to the article by providing a recent photo of Patashnik, which is useful and welcome (I hadn't found a good one when creating the article). Obviously, he tried to cut-n-pasted an Image tag from another page (the BSA article) and stuff it with the external URL to the photo he wanted to contribute. Obviously, the result was a wikicode mess, yet clearly not vandalism.
Obviously, if you decide to take on you to revert his contribution (misguided in form, useful in content), then you also have the duty to properly finish his and your job, and integrate his useful contribution in the proper wiki format, i.e. an external link to the photo. Your simply reverting him and doing nothing else is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, deleting and rejecting a useful contribution from a newbie, and is most toroughly unwikipedian.
This could eventually lead one to wonder if you're not performing such half-assed job more for the quantitative benefit of increasing the boasting count on your user page, than for the qualitative benefit of the Wikipedia.
-- 62.147.112.186 21:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
You've marked an FAQ I'm building for my program of study RIGHT NOW... what gives?
Divb 04:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi: the page on VandalProof reads like 1.01 is out, but the download still pulls 1.0. When I installed 1.0 (I was approved yesterday), it says I have a login failure. When and how can I get 1.01 and can you help with this login failure? Rlevse 15:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
PS: your instructions said to put subt:navpop in monobook, but it didn't seem to work until I made is subst, so you may have to look at my monobook. Rlevse 15:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
1. I get the following error trying to run Vandalproof:
Component 'TABCTL32.OCX' or one of its dependencies not correctly registered: a file is missing or invalid.
2. If you still need moderators....
Prodego talk 16:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
casey benedict is the most vip person in the world as noted by everyone —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.65.78.174 ( talk • contribs) .
I have sprotected it and prevented page moves ( history). I'm not sure how exactly to document this as we usually use {{ sprotect}} or another template and list it on WP:PP. Just out of curiosity, would you be willing to tell me why you want that page to be sprotected? -- PS2pcGAMER ( talk) 23:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
How close are we? -- Mets501 talk 00:01, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
there is no link to download the current version —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Betacommand ( talk • contribs) .
Please put all tasty Easter wishes here!
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 06:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Hate to be a pain But Why am I noy on the list of approved users I have a message on my talk page saying I am Betacommand 07:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Does your program use the BIOS messenger? XP service pack 2 has it disabled for security, but after I installed VandalProof, my anti-spyware informed me it was on. Is this from VandalProof or unrelated?
Prodego talk 13:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
How come when you press the any of the rollback {{subst:test}} buttons it doesn't rollback the changes, but it warns them? I Lov E Plankton 20:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, yeah this happened just after I downloaded v1.1. I downloaded it using IR Tbas in Firefox, then when I opended up VandalProof got that error message about running scripts and the programme unexpectedly closed twice. So I closed the IE Tab and got the error message again about scripts but the programme was working fine after that.
Can you just leave me ont he moderators list for 2 minutes, and I'll do exactly what I did before, and we can see if that causes the same thing to happen, and I can tell you in detail what I clicked on. -- Wisd e n17 00:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
How do you get your userpage and talkpages to show your online status at the top using green button image? Can you show me how to do this? Thanks! -- Strothra 03:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering if you new how to add anther status? Betacommand 04:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
| case: KEYWORD=STATUS [[Image:Example.jpg|40px]]
This is my first attempt at VandalProof 1.1, and I keep receiving the "Your log-in request failed." page. I've already logged on to Wikipedia on both IE & Firefox. Can you help me check out what is the problem? Thanks in advance! - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 04:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For creating one of the best Anti-vandalism softwares around ! Keep it up & waiting for v1.2!
![]() |
Hi! Does your tool also work on Wikispecies, or does it need modifications? Dagobyte is a real pain in the *** over there. Lycaon 11:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
How about you have a nice, tall glass of shut the f**k up and check your facts. You the Wiki-cop? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.160.147.182 ( talk • contribs) .
Dude can you delete this page for me: [ [1]] thanks. Roadhockey 00:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Roadhockey 00:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey there! How are you doing? I recently added this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=1990&diff=next&oldid=48705527 and it was taken down by you, i was told to use the sand box however the information is true because i personally know this person, i watched him while he was hacking and he is not a script kiddie either. I wish to be anonymous because for my own privacy.
thanks -this ip address —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.86.146.185 ( talk • contribs) .
Thanks for adding me to the list. I am trying it out now, however I get an error every time I connect which says I cannot login. I am currently logged into wikipedia. And my username is set correctly. -- Darkfred Talk to me 03:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you had left me a notice to use summaries in my edits, but even when I did so, 68.33.79.218 ( talk · contribs) keeps re-editing the Snowboard Kids article back to a disorganized and sloppy state despite my efforts in cleaning it up. Please help, I'm sick of him messing things up! Sarahsuke 04:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
No, I didn't tweak it. What's been happening, and I have notived this with other users as well I believe, is that when the VandalProof refert button is pressed the program acts like it reverts the changes but instead only posts a warning message. So what I've been doing is clicking the Revert {{subst:test:?}} button and quickly pressing my admin rollback button however sometimes the page loads to fast. Is there something I can do to avoid this problem? Thanks for noticing. ¡Dustimagic! ( T/ C) 05:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I like the new navigation system you made. Puts the old one to shame!-- Mboverload 05:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
It would have never occurred to me that removing a {{warn1}} from my talk would be construed as vandalism, but you are correct – it's on the vandalism link, provided in the warning. I took it as a polite warning and left it at that. At that point, what I knew of the talk page was taken from the tutorial listed on the main page. There is no mention of removing warnings being an issue. When I got the warning, I figured I knew what vandalism was and what the warning was for and haven't received a warning since. You would think that someone with subvercive intentions would receive multiple warnings, likely have been banned for a time - none of which pertain to me. My unsigned post of “ha ha ha” to an IP:Talk that had committed blatant vandalism was ill considered. It was also done before becoming slightly wikiholic. I have rectified that situation by returning it to my talk page. I take my status seriously and am working to improve wikipedia. That is why a good portion of my edits have been to disambiguate such an exciting topic as nasal. Again, does some vandal indicate by his behavior by performing such rewarding activities?
I have been using popups to revert blatant vandalism. I do this for articles even where I completely disagree with the topic because I'm interested in decent contributions, not juvenile antics, despite what the “ha ha ha” portrays (see Cynthia McKinney – interestingly enough, you and I reverted the same IP vandal User:71.10.160.198 6 Apr 06. It took some learning and in that case, I think I had a learning-curve misfire and reverted to the wrong version – but I ultimately got it right. That’s when I started using Vandal Fighter, but still find that it appears others were having an easier time reverting vandalism; to wit, the summary comments that yours displayed as referenced and CSCWEM (same article, subsequent reverts). That’s why I’m looking for an easier to use or cleaner tool. I don’t like using popups to revert because it references an article number and you have to constantly check to ensure you’re reverting to the correct article.
Regarding your comment on My talk in combination with the edit summary, I am left with a question. When you say “(→Your VandalProof application - Removing warnings = no vp for you)” do you mean forget about it (period), because I made a warning-removal mistake (early in my wikilife) – that’s it, it’s final? Is this something that you will reconsider at a later date? Has any of this further clarified what I am trying to do and what my intentions are? -- Geneb1955 06:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I love your idea to use the buttons for your status. It certainly captures the attention of visitors.
I like it so much I want to use it for my userpages. However, I thought I should ask you first.
So: may I use your button-status idea for my userpages? =) I could do the coding myself if you approve (except maybe the JS x_x). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kalathalan ( talk • contribs) .
Hi, I just tried to use Vandalproof and even though you've said I'm on the approved list it is still giving me the login error page. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 07:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Ami, I hope this finds you well. I am the one who changed the University Venture Fund page. I am a managing director with the fund and did not want our partners listed on the site. The list was very outdated. Also, we are no longer a non-profit organization. Best, -Mark Campbell
Amidaniel,
I have a question about VandalProof eligibility.
The front page says that one must have 250 edits to register. The talk page said that one must have 250 mainspace edits to register. I'd like to know which one is the "official" ruling, as I have 250 edits but not 250 namespace edits.
Thank you very much, (^'-')^ Covington 09:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a question as well. Apparently the edit counter is having problems because I have edited numerous articles and fought several acts of vandalism over the past few days and there is no change in the number of edits. I asked about the counter changing and was told there were problems. As you can see from contributions I have numerous over the past request since my last request. I am concerned with fighting vandalism on this site but for some reason my edit count stays at 243 as you said before just shy of me making the 250. But this sems to be a problem with the counter.-- Gnosis 18:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, the toolserver is officially down, and likely for quite some time. However, if the edit count replicated by the toolserver is below the 250 mainspace mark, I then load up flcelloguy's tool (which is independent of the toolserver, though much slower and less user-friendly) to look at the user's count, and in any case, I typically look more at the user's recent contributions to see what kind of activity s/he has been involved in, as that truly matters more that how many edits s/he's wracked up. The official "policy" is 250 mainspace edits, but that was just added after one user applied with 300 edits to his own userspace and only a few in mainspace. If a user is lacking on mainspace but has a considerable ammount of project-/wikipedia-space edits, etc., it likely won't matter that s/he was "below the bar," so to speak. Decisions are ultimately based upon whether or not the user has enough evidence to be able to trust him/her or not with the tool. I certainly don't feel that edit count says much about a user's quality or character, but a certain number of edits are necessary to be able to make an adequate judgement. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 01:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi I approved some new users, and they added to the list fine. I then clicked on welcome selcted users, and the little blue progress bar in the window completed, then I got a runtime error and VP closed. Now I see that not only did it not add welcome messages to the selected users it deleted User:Spangineer from the awaiting approval list, and it won't let me onto VP now, saying my login request failed. -- Wisd e n17 22:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
AmiDaniel,
Thanks for adding me to the list of authorized users of VandalProof. I'm getting a "Your log-in request failed" message when I tried to use it, though. I tried logging in through the current browser as was suggested, but still get the message. Any suggestions?
Thanks, Catbar (Brian Rock) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Catbar ( talk • contribs) .
As per above, just curiosity. (I am C++ programmer). Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 01:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't know your app required user2 to be the way it was. I won't change it back since it isn't that big of a deal to remove it but since the toolserver tool doesn't have much of a notice (only regular sized blinking text) that it is becoming increasingly out of date due to not getting new data I figured that it was misleading to have the toolserver count link up on the template. Since this is a global template I'd also suggest changing wherever possible in your code to point to a user subpage template version and change your subpages as such since that will prevent any future problems just in case the template ever needs to be modded in the future. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 01:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
to use the notifiy contributors function of this program for things other than vandalism, or things related to vandalism?
Interesting, with the source code, unfortunatly that means I am unable to help, as I am a self taught C++/CLI programmer. I am a freshman in colledge and will learn more languages next year.
I made some modifications to my status changer based on Sceptre's changes. You might be interested.
The changes:
Check my
talk and you'll see that the status looks like a tab. I like this. :)
If you like it, the changes to make are in the first line (div command) of
StatusDiv. —
nath
a
nrdotcom (
T •
C •
W)
03:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
first of the bad... I found a new bug (runtime error 330, go ahead and go to the bug page and read what I wrote, no sense me repeating.
The good, is that I may have a solution to another "related??" bug. Go to this link to go directly to that.
Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 07:08, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
1)Please give me till tomarrow (probably night), It is 2:00AM here, and I don't want to look at code, and if I did I would 99.9% of the time send you the wrong part.
2)make sure that the timer is triggered BEFORE the program calls the webBrowser, but AFTER the program does all the fancy stuff, (finding out how many times each editor edits an article, ect.)
Thanks for fixing the puppet master box on my userpage! I was looking around for a gender specific version of the box (as it seems quite unnecessary to be gender neutral when the gender of the user is clearly known), and I never even thought to try a second paramater! I guess should have actually looked at the wikicode for the template. But, again, thank you for fixing it... I need all the help I can get :->. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 07:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Testing Notify All Contributors using no optimization arguments. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 07:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Why not mention Interiot's Tool 2 to the VandalProof users? Your edit counter didn't work right when I asked it for my edit count.
Feel free to let me know of any software you make public, I'll be happy to mirror it for you. —
nath
a
nrdotcom (
T •
C •
W)
07:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you Tintin ( talk) 08:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm getting the same problem with VP when I try to add a welcome template to new users. I click welcome selected users and then the blue status bar fills up completely only for a pop-up message to say "Run-time erro "380" Invalid property value", and the programme closes, and the users don't get their welcomes. Any ideas? -- Wisd e n17 17:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you for your efforts and don't think moderating VP would be too big of a problem, as I check my watchlist often and the User_talk:AmiDaniel/VandalProof page is already watched anyway. I'm normally on from 05:00 to 08:00 and from 17:00 to 19:00 (all times in UTC). Please contact me if you accept, I don't think more mods could do any harm, and it wouldn't cause me any troubles. F e tofs Hello! 01:00, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for putting me on the approved list, but why didn't I get a message informing me of this as the page promised? - Mgm| (talk) 09:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
When you do mass talk pages edits, such as to all users who user VandalProof, is there a way to automate that vice editing each page one at a time. I am the Scouting Project Coordinator and sometimes I'd like to make an announcement to everyone, but it takes to long. So, I'm left with making the announcement on our "current issues" section and only editing the talk pages of those who are most likely to respond. Rlevse 10:04, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Somethings were just repeat bugs that have been seen before, I put the recommended solution to the bug... might help the user before you can get to it.
Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 22:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Are you able to respond to the bolded question??? if not for whatever reason, I will understand:-).
I moved the page because the talk page had recently seemed to be moved, but the content page had not, leaving to a talk page with a red/uncreated project page. I assumed that the person who moved the page had simply forgotten to move the proposal page along with this; with the many discussions on renaming the proposal and the title not indicative that the page was supposed to be a subpage of the original proposal, I didn't realize that the talk had simply been moved to an archive. I apologize for this error and will rectify it immediately. Thanks! Flcelloguy ( A note?) 04:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll give it a try. One little thing, though: when you tell users they're approved, do you mind substing {{PAGENAME}}? No big deal, but it's a minor pet peeve of mine... ;) Tito xd( ?!? - help us) 04:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey Ami... as the user who greeted me to Wikipedia more than a month ago, I thought I should go to you for this... My username (Ardo Melnikov) is that of a fictional character from the Starcraft Book series. Specifically, the book Starcraft: Speed of Darkness. As the character I stole my name from is the main name of the character in the book, if I created that article, would it be construed as a Vanity article, even if I am not the character in question?
Sincerely, Logical2u 22:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Is your program useing the NET. Framework??? if so I have some code that you may be able to incorporate... (I will give it to you about a week from now... as I want to clean it up a bit (I have my pride)
Are you able to respond to question??? if not for whatever reason, I will understand:-). (this opensource thing is really getting out of hand... I have been watching it... looks like a frustrating mess:-( shakes head.
Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 22:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi just added a user, and the list of approved users got deleted. Can't seem to get it back and the lsit will now not laod in the moderator tools. Can you revert the edit. Ii still can't get the welcome checked users to work either. -- Wisd e n17 22:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
I am contesting the vandalism warning on German Goo Girls by User:Srikeit issued to User talk:195.188.152.12
I quote from the definition of vandalism : "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated."
My addition was a good-faith effort to improve the entry, and Srikeit overstepped the mark in my opinion calling it vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.188.152.12 ( talk • contribs) .
Further to
User:Srikeit - if you read his talk page
User_talk:Srikeit it seems I'm not the only one to have a problem with his (imo) overzealous reverting. S/he states on another talk page that s/he has been doing it for about a week and already you can see the amount of controversy that has arisen. Reverting obvious vandalism is one thing, but s/he seems to think that anything contributed by someone without an account and without an edit summary should be reverted and seems to pay little or no attention to the actual entry. See his/her reverting of
Lien-Da as another example.
I for one won't be bothering to contribute to Wikipedia any more if every time I add something I have to deal with this sort of nonsense. 195.188.152.12 08:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
==Do Not Remove Warnings== Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks.
F
e
tofs
Hello!
01:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
here is an edit summery of yours... look at it for a moment:-)
(diff) (hist) . . m User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs; 00:18 . . AmiDaniel (Talk | contribs) (→'Your log-in request failed' - glad to hear it)
LMAO! I seem to keep getting into trouble with my edit summaries being misunderstood. Like, when I can't think of an appropriate summary of my edits on a talk page that don't really need explaining I just type in a random song lyric from a song I'm listening to...seems to aggitate some people. It's nice to know I've got someone watching out for my every mistake though! lol AmiDaniel ( Talk) 02:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Just curious, as I am on wiki quite often, and have interest in this program. In addition I understand the security risks. Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 02:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof Boxes
|
I just whipped up a VandalProof userbox, and was wondering if you'd like it for distribution; this one is for moderators (I'm not one, but I just made it anyway), and I can make one for users. Thanks for considering my request, and cheers!
_-M
o
P-_
04:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you proposed my article be deleted. I just curious as to what was wrong with it and how I can improve to keep it from being deleted. Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Kc12286
The information in both the Angela Shelton and Searching for Angela articles is taken largely from her official website (bearing in mind copyright laws). However, I did happen to see the 48 Hours special, myself, which resulted in my buying the movie. I just updated the page and included links to both the Searching for Angela Shelton website and a link to purchase the video. I will include a link the article itself. Kc12286Kc12286
Hopefully the final test (again). AmiDaniel ( Talk) 06:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I was working a page link from "Sophos", for their CEO and you deleted the article before I had finished, can you tell me why ? as if I had done something wrong I can avoid doing so again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bienvenum ( talk • contribs) .
Do you need anymore moderators for VandalProof? I Lov E Plankton 13:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a bug with the moderator functions: some users aren't welcomed at all (i.e. Zxcvbnm, and others are welcomed multiple times, I apologize if this has already been brought up somewhere.
Prodego talk 17:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. -- Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I thought I should ask you first. I would like to reorganize your bug page, grouping "fixed"("addressed" i.e. in next version) bugs togather and "unfixed" bugs in another group. Let me know what you think, but this change will make the page more readable. (then as we move to new versions of the program I or you can move old bugs into an archive)
P.S. I responded above about being a moderator, I responded yes, I would be glad to be able to update the welcome pages for you. (I may not do all that much "new user" approval, but I think my value is elsewhere:-). Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 02:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
hey - sorry about not leaving an edit summary, i went to change back my edits soon after anyways...i had read online that the band prefered to have their name formatted in all caps, similar to how the band dredg is always formatted in all lower-case. I then soon after found that it has also been presented in various forms of formatting (underOATH, for example), and therefore would probably be best left as it was, in standard form. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.233.86.112 ( talk • contribs) .
Many thanks for the blink-of-an-eye user page revert. Wrestling fans are the touchiest vandals, it would seem. Kuru talk 04:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
They are so funny, especially when you are fighting vandals or finding bugs, (up to 3 more!!!, but I am waiting for the new version, as I suspect that these will be solved, plus they are really obscure) anyway here is a sample of the latest time you made me laugh!!!
Thanks for the humor!!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 05:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm positive that hippies have been rejected as a feature. =) -- Mboverload 05:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I wasn't expecting 70 supports. I wasn't even expecting 70 total votes. Right now, I'm hovering around the 70% mark, and odds are probably against me being promoted on this effort, but I've learned a lot of valuable things through vote interactions such as yours. We'll see what happens, but I thank you for taking the time to post a question for me there, and the kind words on my talk page. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 05:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I thought I should ask you first. I would like to reorganize your bug page, grouping "fixed"("addressed" i.e. in next version) bugs togather and "unfixed" bugs in another group. Let me know what you think, but this change will make the page more readable. (then as we move to new versions of the program I or you can move old bugs into an archive)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 17 | 24 April 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
some guy on wikipedia who likes Smith said Smith was gay.....I must be tired cause that doesn't make alot of sense. 132.241.246.111 05:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your undying dedication to this fantastic project, helping dozens of users requiring assistance on their installs, signing up scores of others, fixing hiccups in release 1.0 whilst still programming v. 1.01 and always with a smile! It's an honor to assist you, just wish I could do more... Congratulations my friend. - Gl e n T C 19:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For creating the best ever tool to fight vandals! Computerjoe 's talk 19:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
You are super silly and sensitive. Next time you want to act so calamorous, do it to someone else you goose. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.8.249.175 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC).
I hate you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.8.249.175 ( talk • contribs) .
On the Oren Patashnik article, this diff of your single action is the worst sort of unwikipedian half-assed job.
Obviously, some newbie tried to contribute to the article by providing a recent photo of Patashnik, which is useful and welcome (I hadn't found a good one when creating the article). Obviously, he tried to cut-n-pasted an Image tag from another page (the BSA article) and stuff it with the external URL to the photo he wanted to contribute. Obviously, the result was a wikicode mess, yet clearly not vandalism.
Obviously, if you decide to take on you to revert his contribution (misguided in form, useful in content), then you also have the duty to properly finish his and your job, and integrate his useful contribution in the proper wiki format, i.e. an external link to the photo. Your simply reverting him and doing nothing else is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, deleting and rejecting a useful contribution from a newbie, and is most toroughly unwikipedian.
This could eventually lead one to wonder if you're not performing such half-assed job more for the quantitative benefit of increasing the boasting count on your user page, than for the qualitative benefit of the Wikipedia.
-- 62.147.112.186 21:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
You've marked an FAQ I'm building for my program of study RIGHT NOW... what gives?
Divb 04:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi: the page on VandalProof reads like 1.01 is out, but the download still pulls 1.0. When I installed 1.0 (I was approved yesterday), it says I have a login failure. When and how can I get 1.01 and can you help with this login failure? Rlevse 15:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
PS: your instructions said to put subt:navpop in monobook, but it didn't seem to work until I made is subst, so you may have to look at my monobook. Rlevse 15:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
1. I get the following error trying to run Vandalproof:
Component 'TABCTL32.OCX' or one of its dependencies not correctly registered: a file is missing or invalid.
2. If you still need moderators....
Prodego talk 16:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
casey benedict is the most vip person in the world as noted by everyone —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.65.78.174 ( talk • contribs) .
I have sprotected it and prevented page moves ( history). I'm not sure how exactly to document this as we usually use {{ sprotect}} or another template and list it on WP:PP. Just out of curiosity, would you be willing to tell me why you want that page to be sprotected? -- PS2pcGAMER ( talk) 23:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
How close are we? -- Mets501 talk 00:01, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
there is no link to download the current version —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Betacommand ( talk • contribs) .
Please put all tasty Easter wishes here!
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 06:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Hate to be a pain But Why am I noy on the list of approved users I have a message on my talk page saying I am Betacommand 07:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Does your program use the BIOS messenger? XP service pack 2 has it disabled for security, but after I installed VandalProof, my anti-spyware informed me it was on. Is this from VandalProof or unrelated?
Prodego talk 13:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
How come when you press the any of the rollback {{subst:test}} buttons it doesn't rollback the changes, but it warns them? I Lov E Plankton 20:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, yeah this happened just after I downloaded v1.1. I downloaded it using IR Tbas in Firefox, then when I opended up VandalProof got that error message about running scripts and the programme unexpectedly closed twice. So I closed the IE Tab and got the error message again about scripts but the programme was working fine after that.
Can you just leave me ont he moderators list for 2 minutes, and I'll do exactly what I did before, and we can see if that causes the same thing to happen, and I can tell you in detail what I clicked on. -- Wisd e n17 00:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
How do you get your userpage and talkpages to show your online status at the top using green button image? Can you show me how to do this? Thanks! -- Strothra 03:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering if you new how to add anther status? Betacommand 04:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
| case: KEYWORD=STATUS [[Image:Example.jpg|40px]]
This is my first attempt at VandalProof 1.1, and I keep receiving the "Your log-in request failed." page. I've already logged on to Wikipedia on both IE & Firefox. Can you help me check out what is the problem? Thanks in advance! - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 04:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For creating one of the best Anti-vandalism softwares around ! Keep it up & waiting for v1.2!
![]() |
Hi! Does your tool also work on Wikispecies, or does it need modifications? Dagobyte is a real pain in the *** over there. Lycaon 11:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
How about you have a nice, tall glass of shut the f**k up and check your facts. You the Wiki-cop? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.160.147.182 ( talk • contribs) .
Dude can you delete this page for me: [ [1]] thanks. Roadhockey 00:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Roadhockey 00:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey there! How are you doing? I recently added this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=1990&diff=next&oldid=48705527 and it was taken down by you, i was told to use the sand box however the information is true because i personally know this person, i watched him while he was hacking and he is not a script kiddie either. I wish to be anonymous because for my own privacy.
thanks -this ip address —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.86.146.185 ( talk • contribs) .
Thanks for adding me to the list. I am trying it out now, however I get an error every time I connect which says I cannot login. I am currently logged into wikipedia. And my username is set correctly. -- Darkfred Talk to me 03:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you had left me a notice to use summaries in my edits, but even when I did so, 68.33.79.218 ( talk · contribs) keeps re-editing the Snowboard Kids article back to a disorganized and sloppy state despite my efforts in cleaning it up. Please help, I'm sick of him messing things up! Sarahsuke 04:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
No, I didn't tweak it. What's been happening, and I have notived this with other users as well I believe, is that when the VandalProof refert button is pressed the program acts like it reverts the changes but instead only posts a warning message. So what I've been doing is clicking the Revert {{subst:test:?}} button and quickly pressing my admin rollback button however sometimes the page loads to fast. Is there something I can do to avoid this problem? Thanks for noticing. ¡Dustimagic! ( T/ C) 05:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I like the new navigation system you made. Puts the old one to shame!-- Mboverload 05:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
It would have never occurred to me that removing a {{warn1}} from my talk would be construed as vandalism, but you are correct – it's on the vandalism link, provided in the warning. I took it as a polite warning and left it at that. At that point, what I knew of the talk page was taken from the tutorial listed on the main page. There is no mention of removing warnings being an issue. When I got the warning, I figured I knew what vandalism was and what the warning was for and haven't received a warning since. You would think that someone with subvercive intentions would receive multiple warnings, likely have been banned for a time - none of which pertain to me. My unsigned post of “ha ha ha” to an IP:Talk that had committed blatant vandalism was ill considered. It was also done before becoming slightly wikiholic. I have rectified that situation by returning it to my talk page. I take my status seriously and am working to improve wikipedia. That is why a good portion of my edits have been to disambiguate such an exciting topic as nasal. Again, does some vandal indicate by his behavior by performing such rewarding activities?
I have been using popups to revert blatant vandalism. I do this for articles even where I completely disagree with the topic because I'm interested in decent contributions, not juvenile antics, despite what the “ha ha ha” portrays (see Cynthia McKinney – interestingly enough, you and I reverted the same IP vandal User:71.10.160.198 6 Apr 06. It took some learning and in that case, I think I had a learning-curve misfire and reverted to the wrong version – but I ultimately got it right. That’s when I started using Vandal Fighter, but still find that it appears others were having an easier time reverting vandalism; to wit, the summary comments that yours displayed as referenced and CSCWEM (same article, subsequent reverts). That’s why I’m looking for an easier to use or cleaner tool. I don’t like using popups to revert because it references an article number and you have to constantly check to ensure you’re reverting to the correct article.
Regarding your comment on My talk in combination with the edit summary, I am left with a question. When you say “(→Your VandalProof application - Removing warnings = no vp for you)” do you mean forget about it (period), because I made a warning-removal mistake (early in my wikilife) – that’s it, it’s final? Is this something that you will reconsider at a later date? Has any of this further clarified what I am trying to do and what my intentions are? -- Geneb1955 06:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I love your idea to use the buttons for your status. It certainly captures the attention of visitors.
I like it so much I want to use it for my userpages. However, I thought I should ask you first.
So: may I use your button-status idea for my userpages? =) I could do the coding myself if you approve (except maybe the JS x_x). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kalathalan ( talk • contribs) .
Hi, I just tried to use Vandalproof and even though you've said I'm on the approved list it is still giving me the login error page. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 07:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Ami, I hope this finds you well. I am the one who changed the University Venture Fund page. I am a managing director with the fund and did not want our partners listed on the site. The list was very outdated. Also, we are no longer a non-profit organization. Best, -Mark Campbell
Amidaniel,
I have a question about VandalProof eligibility.
The front page says that one must have 250 edits to register. The talk page said that one must have 250 mainspace edits to register. I'd like to know which one is the "official" ruling, as I have 250 edits but not 250 namespace edits.
Thank you very much, (^'-')^ Covington 09:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a question as well. Apparently the edit counter is having problems because I have edited numerous articles and fought several acts of vandalism over the past few days and there is no change in the number of edits. I asked about the counter changing and was told there were problems. As you can see from contributions I have numerous over the past request since my last request. I am concerned with fighting vandalism on this site but for some reason my edit count stays at 243 as you said before just shy of me making the 250. But this sems to be a problem with the counter.-- Gnosis 18:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, the toolserver is officially down, and likely for quite some time. However, if the edit count replicated by the toolserver is below the 250 mainspace mark, I then load up flcelloguy's tool (which is independent of the toolserver, though much slower and less user-friendly) to look at the user's count, and in any case, I typically look more at the user's recent contributions to see what kind of activity s/he has been involved in, as that truly matters more that how many edits s/he's wracked up. The official "policy" is 250 mainspace edits, but that was just added after one user applied with 300 edits to his own userspace and only a few in mainspace. If a user is lacking on mainspace but has a considerable ammount of project-/wikipedia-space edits, etc., it likely won't matter that s/he was "below the bar," so to speak. Decisions are ultimately based upon whether or not the user has enough evidence to be able to trust him/her or not with the tool. I certainly don't feel that edit count says much about a user's quality or character, but a certain number of edits are necessary to be able to make an adequate judgement. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 01:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi I approved some new users, and they added to the list fine. I then clicked on welcome selcted users, and the little blue progress bar in the window completed, then I got a runtime error and VP closed. Now I see that not only did it not add welcome messages to the selected users it deleted User:Spangineer from the awaiting approval list, and it won't let me onto VP now, saying my login request failed. -- Wisd e n17 22:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
AmiDaniel,
Thanks for adding me to the list of authorized users of VandalProof. I'm getting a "Your log-in request failed" message when I tried to use it, though. I tried logging in through the current browser as was suggested, but still get the message. Any suggestions?
Thanks, Catbar (Brian Rock) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Catbar ( talk • contribs) .
As per above, just curiosity. (I am C++ programmer). Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 01:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't know your app required user2 to be the way it was. I won't change it back since it isn't that big of a deal to remove it but since the toolserver tool doesn't have much of a notice (only regular sized blinking text) that it is becoming increasingly out of date due to not getting new data I figured that it was misleading to have the toolserver count link up on the template. Since this is a global template I'd also suggest changing wherever possible in your code to point to a user subpage template version and change your subpages as such since that will prevent any future problems just in case the template ever needs to be modded in the future. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 01:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
to use the notifiy contributors function of this program for things other than vandalism, or things related to vandalism?
Interesting, with the source code, unfortunatly that means I am unable to help, as I am a self taught C++/CLI programmer. I am a freshman in colledge and will learn more languages next year.
I made some modifications to my status changer based on Sceptre's changes. You might be interested.
The changes:
Check my
talk and you'll see that the status looks like a tab. I like this. :)
If you like it, the changes to make are in the first line (div command) of
StatusDiv. —
nath
a
nrdotcom (
T •
C •
W)
03:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
first of the bad... I found a new bug (runtime error 330, go ahead and go to the bug page and read what I wrote, no sense me repeating.
The good, is that I may have a solution to another "related??" bug. Go to this link to go directly to that.
Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 07:08, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
1)Please give me till tomarrow (probably night), It is 2:00AM here, and I don't want to look at code, and if I did I would 99.9% of the time send you the wrong part.
2)make sure that the timer is triggered BEFORE the program calls the webBrowser, but AFTER the program does all the fancy stuff, (finding out how many times each editor edits an article, ect.)
Thanks for fixing the puppet master box on my userpage! I was looking around for a gender specific version of the box (as it seems quite unnecessary to be gender neutral when the gender of the user is clearly known), and I never even thought to try a second paramater! I guess should have actually looked at the wikicode for the template. But, again, thank you for fixing it... I need all the help I can get :->. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 07:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Testing Notify All Contributors using no optimization arguments. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 07:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Why not mention Interiot's Tool 2 to the VandalProof users? Your edit counter didn't work right when I asked it for my edit count.
Feel free to let me know of any software you make public, I'll be happy to mirror it for you. —
nath
a
nrdotcom (
T •
C •
W)
07:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you Tintin ( talk) 08:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm getting the same problem with VP when I try to add a welcome template to new users. I click welcome selected users and then the blue status bar fills up completely only for a pop-up message to say "Run-time erro "380" Invalid property value", and the programme closes, and the users don't get their welcomes. Any ideas? -- Wisd e n17 17:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to thank you for your efforts and don't think moderating VP would be too big of a problem, as I check my watchlist often and the User_talk:AmiDaniel/VandalProof page is already watched anyway. I'm normally on from 05:00 to 08:00 and from 17:00 to 19:00 (all times in UTC). Please contact me if you accept, I don't think more mods could do any harm, and it wouldn't cause me any troubles. F e tofs Hello! 01:00, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for putting me on the approved list, but why didn't I get a message informing me of this as the page promised? - Mgm| (talk) 09:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
When you do mass talk pages edits, such as to all users who user VandalProof, is there a way to automate that vice editing each page one at a time. I am the Scouting Project Coordinator and sometimes I'd like to make an announcement to everyone, but it takes to long. So, I'm left with making the announcement on our "current issues" section and only editing the talk pages of those who are most likely to respond. Rlevse 10:04, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Somethings were just repeat bugs that have been seen before, I put the recommended solution to the bug... might help the user before you can get to it.
Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 22:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Are you able to respond to the bolded question??? if not for whatever reason, I will understand:-).
I moved the page because the talk page had recently seemed to be moved, but the content page had not, leaving to a talk page with a red/uncreated project page. I assumed that the person who moved the page had simply forgotten to move the proposal page along with this; with the many discussions on renaming the proposal and the title not indicative that the page was supposed to be a subpage of the original proposal, I didn't realize that the talk had simply been moved to an archive. I apologize for this error and will rectify it immediately. Thanks! Flcelloguy ( A note?) 04:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll give it a try. One little thing, though: when you tell users they're approved, do you mind substing {{PAGENAME}}? No big deal, but it's a minor pet peeve of mine... ;) Tito xd( ?!? - help us) 04:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey Ami... as the user who greeted me to Wikipedia more than a month ago, I thought I should go to you for this... My username (Ardo Melnikov) is that of a fictional character from the Starcraft Book series. Specifically, the book Starcraft: Speed of Darkness. As the character I stole my name from is the main name of the character in the book, if I created that article, would it be construed as a Vanity article, even if I am not the character in question?
Sincerely, Logical2u 22:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Is your program useing the NET. Framework??? if so I have some code that you may be able to incorporate... (I will give it to you about a week from now... as I want to clean it up a bit (I have my pride)
Are you able to respond to question??? if not for whatever reason, I will understand:-). (this opensource thing is really getting out of hand... I have been watching it... looks like a frustrating mess:-( shakes head.
Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 22:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi just added a user, and the list of approved users got deleted. Can't seem to get it back and the lsit will now not laod in the moderator tools. Can you revert the edit. Ii still can't get the welcome checked users to work either. -- Wisd e n17 22:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
I am contesting the vandalism warning on German Goo Girls by User:Srikeit issued to User talk:195.188.152.12
I quote from the definition of vandalism : "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated."
My addition was a good-faith effort to improve the entry, and Srikeit overstepped the mark in my opinion calling it vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.188.152.12 ( talk • contribs) .
Further to
User:Srikeit - if you read his talk page
User_talk:Srikeit it seems I'm not the only one to have a problem with his (imo) overzealous reverting. S/he states on another talk page that s/he has been doing it for about a week and already you can see the amount of controversy that has arisen. Reverting obvious vandalism is one thing, but s/he seems to think that anything contributed by someone without an account and without an edit summary should be reverted and seems to pay little or no attention to the actual entry. See his/her reverting of
Lien-Da as another example.
I for one won't be bothering to contribute to Wikipedia any more if every time I add something I have to deal with this sort of nonsense. 195.188.152.12 08:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
==Do Not Remove Warnings== Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks.
F
e
tofs
Hello!
01:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
here is an edit summery of yours... look at it for a moment:-)
(diff) (hist) . . m User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs; 00:18 . . AmiDaniel (Talk | contribs) (→'Your log-in request failed' - glad to hear it)
LMAO! I seem to keep getting into trouble with my edit summaries being misunderstood. Like, when I can't think of an appropriate summary of my edits on a talk page that don't really need explaining I just type in a random song lyric from a song I'm listening to...seems to aggitate some people. It's nice to know I've got someone watching out for my every mistake though! lol AmiDaniel ( Talk) 02:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Just curious, as I am on wiki quite often, and have interest in this program. In addition I understand the security risks. Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 02:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof Boxes
|
I just whipped up a VandalProof userbox, and was wondering if you'd like it for distribution; this one is for moderators (I'm not one, but I just made it anyway), and I can make one for users. Thanks for considering my request, and cheers!
_-M
o
P-_
04:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you proposed my article be deleted. I just curious as to what was wrong with it and how I can improve to keep it from being deleted. Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Kc12286
The information in both the Angela Shelton and Searching for Angela articles is taken largely from her official website (bearing in mind copyright laws). However, I did happen to see the 48 Hours special, myself, which resulted in my buying the movie. I just updated the page and included links to both the Searching for Angela Shelton website and a link to purchase the video. I will include a link the article itself. Kc12286Kc12286
Hopefully the final test (again). AmiDaniel ( Talk) 06:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I was working a page link from "Sophos", for their CEO and you deleted the article before I had finished, can you tell me why ? as if I had done something wrong I can avoid doing so again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bienvenum ( talk • contribs) .
Do you need anymore moderators for VandalProof? I Lov E Plankton 13:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I have a bug with the moderator functions: some users aren't welcomed at all (i.e. Zxcvbnm, and others are welcomed multiple times, I apologize if this has already been brought up somewhere.
Prodego talk 17:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. -- Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I thought I should ask you first. I would like to reorganize your bug page, grouping "fixed"("addressed" i.e. in next version) bugs togather and "unfixed" bugs in another group. Let me know what you think, but this change will make the page more readable. (then as we move to new versions of the program I or you can move old bugs into an archive)
P.S. I responded above about being a moderator, I responded yes, I would be glad to be able to update the welcome pages for you. (I may not do all that much "new user" approval, but I think my value is elsewhere:-). Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 02:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
hey - sorry about not leaving an edit summary, i went to change back my edits soon after anyways...i had read online that the band prefered to have their name formatted in all caps, similar to how the band dredg is always formatted in all lower-case. I then soon after found that it has also been presented in various forms of formatting (underOATH, for example), and therefore would probably be best left as it was, in standard form. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.233.86.112 ( talk • contribs) .
Many thanks for the blink-of-an-eye user page revert. Wrestling fans are the touchiest vandals, it would seem. Kuru talk 04:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
They are so funny, especially when you are fighting vandals or finding bugs, (up to 3 more!!!, but I am waiting for the new version, as I suspect that these will be solved, plus they are really obscure) anyway here is a sample of the latest time you made me laugh!!!
Thanks for the humor!!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 05:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm positive that hippies have been rejected as a feature. =) -- Mboverload 05:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I wasn't expecting 70 supports. I wasn't even expecting 70 total votes. Right now, I'm hovering around the 70% mark, and odds are probably against me being promoted on this effort, but I've learned a lot of valuable things through vote interactions such as yours. We'll see what happens, but I thank you for taking the time to post a question for me there, and the kind words on my talk page. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 05:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I thought I should ask you first. I would like to reorganize your bug page, grouping "fixed"("addressed" i.e. in next version) bugs togather and "unfixed" bugs in another group. Let me know what you think, but this change will make the page more readable. (then as we move to new versions of the program I or you can move old bugs into an archive)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 17 | 24 April 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
some guy on wikipedia who likes Smith said Smith was gay.....I must be tired cause that doesn't make alot of sense. 132.241.246.111 05:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)