![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Pythagoras-2a.gif, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
|
"removing gallery of mostly sub-standard pictures"? well, I admit your photo is superb, and deserves all compliments, but why deleting all others? Such drastic action done by the only "survivor" may indicate some COI. With all due respect I would let an objective editor to decide about that. Perhaps you are right, after all. Perhaps not. Etan J. Tal 16:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etan J. Tal ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
valued picture status Your image,
File:Wasp August 2007-23.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Elekhh (
talk)
05:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
|
If that picture is kept on the article for one month, do you think it would stand a chance of getting promoted? -- Tyw7 ( ☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 09:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
valued picture status Your image,
File:Mosquito 2007-2.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
02:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
|
Hey, just to let you know that I listed File:WInd Rose Aguiar.png for delisting here to be replaced with this SVG version. I hope this is OK. Mahahahaneapneap ( talk) 15:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
I'll just mention that there are some new reply options for this question, which also serves as an example of how the poll should progress when none of the available options suit the contributors. The question on dealing with unclear consensus has apparently been the most controversial so far. I remain hopeful that we will succeed in representing people's opinions by the time the poll ends. Feel free to change your vote or add a new reply option if the three new ones still don't quite work for you. (But obviously, try to create something general enough that it's likely to gather a following.) Thank you. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 09:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Missing square edit.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 6, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-05-06. Yes, this is very late. I had put it in as a possibility for April Fool's Day, but it didn't get picked, and then I forgot about it again until now. howcheng { chat} 23:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Papaver April 2010-8a.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
|
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Papaver April 2010-13_crop.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
|
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Papaver April 2010-9.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Maedin\ talk 21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
[1] Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 17:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Torre Belém April 2009-4a.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 31, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-05-31. howcheng { chat} 17:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Porto Covo pano April 2009-4.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 16, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-06-16. howcheng { chat} 17:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Hoverfly January 2008-6.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 27, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-06-27. howcheng { chat} 16:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Cat-five suggested extending the voting period for undervisited, unanimously supported noms. I can't think of a way this system could be gamed, but thought I'd pass it by you as you seemed at previous discussions to have some expertise in game theory. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 23:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety talk 06:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
I posted a few questions I had at Talk:Porto Covo, but no one seems to have acted on them. Since you seem to have edited the article heavily, perhaps you can take a look? Thanks. howcheng { chat} 18:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
That part of the text was there since the begining and I didn't understand its meaning either. It is simplified now. -- Alvesgaspar ( talk) 22:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() | You are being contacted because you have in the past participated in the Valued Picture project. The VPC project is suffering from a chronic lack of participation to the point that the project is at an impasse. A discussion is currently taking place about the future of this project and how to revitalize the project and participation. If you're interested in this project or have an idea of how to improve it please stop by and participate in the discussion. |
— raeky T 00:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Full moon detail1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Full moon detail2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Could you improve the translation of the article Transportes Aéreos da Índia Portuguesa? It has been translated from the Portugese Wikipedia to English, but needs some help from a native speaker. Thanks. -- 92.8.153.90 ( talk) 16:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
..............................................
Hi Alvesgaspar, The editor's page said I had to give you a notice that I had made a comment, so, here is your notice: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. on your comments on "edit warring".
I am new to Wikipedia, and I have not been part of any scientific edit warring, and I only want to use the drawings of why sunsets and sunrises are red and orange and peach colors. Wanbli-g53 ( talk) 02:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Wanbli-g53
Could it be helpful to inform also the people who recently partecipated to editing/discussion, that is
Grafen (
talk|
contribs),
Falcon8765 (
talk|
contribs),
Spiel496 (
talk|
contribs),
Kbrose (
talk|
contribs),
about the
thread ? --
GianniG46 (
talk)
13:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've emailed you. Tony (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Makeemlighter (
talk)
05:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Why do you keep removing the updated lifeguard photo? -- 71.200.70.155 ( talk) 21:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Umm, VP got shut down. (I know this is sort of a late response to your edit.) / ƒETCH COMMS / 22:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Cat November 2010-1a.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
23:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
|
Hi. I noticed you removed two labeled pictures from the page, on account of it being "low quality". I reversed your edit. The purpose of those pictures wasn't "quality" but the identification labels of the individuals on the monument. Until someone comes up with a better picture and does the labels, I believe it is useful to retain these. Walrasiad ( talk) 21:18, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Eu não sei o que posse dizer: monitorizar a página, editar excessivo imagens e registar as suas opiniões com a comunidade. Eventualmente o "blotting" vai ser viste por pessoas com mais experiença e ele não pode escapar. Tive problemas com o numero de páginas nesta página no passado, mas as adicicões recente foram excessivo. Fiz alguns editos hoje para diminuir, mas acho o minimo uma imagen por cada tema seria suficiente para comunicar as ideias (ou numa imagen também). Como ele tem uma historia de edição e colaboração no EN Wikipedia estou suprendido que o Caliphat123 não começe um diologo. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) ( talk) 09:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
I have unstruck the vote from the new user. Yeah, anonymous votes are typically ignored, which is bad enough to start with, but you feel we should extend this to the votes of new users? How should a new user offer an opinion, if not creating an account and then posting? If you have evidence that there's something up here, by all means, present it, but striking the vote of a new user (especially when the new user is supporting something you happen to oppose) just because they're new is more than a little bitey. J Milburn ( talk) 21:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 10, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-06-10. howcheng { chat} 22:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Coreopsis July 2011-2.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
21:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Hi, Why did you change the infobox picture? How do you consider it more appropriate? -- Muhammad (talk) 02:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Alvesgapar. I am Portuguese and I know what I say about this topic. I will easily find a ton of references about anti-nuclear in Portugal and restore all the statements done before. I will remember you the Ferrel affair, near Peniche, in 1976, when the anti-nuclear movement, with the overwhelming support of the civil local population, defeated a project for the first nuclear power plant to be built in the country. Mr. Joca ( talk) 15:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Moscow July 2011-7a.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
00:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
|
When reporting editors to an Administrators' Noticeboard, you are required to post a notice to their talk page. You failed to do so in your complaint against User: Mr. Joca. I will place a notice for him; however, it is your responsibility to directly notify all involved parties when you report incidents to noticeboards. Van Isaac WS contribs 06:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Pythagoras-2a.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 9, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-10-09. howcheng { chat} 16:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
For your wonderful picture of the day, File:Pythagoras-2a.gif, which proves everyone's favourite mathematical theorem in a simple and clear manner. The Cavalry ( Message me) 23:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
I agree. -- Raghith 04:43, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Actually, this incident is exhibit A in why I would have blocked you. The fact that you so egregiously violated WP:Don't bite the newbies that Mr. Joca has not returned in a month is exactly why we have such policies and why your actions and attitude are so disruptive. You have driven a prospective editor away from this project, and those editors are a valuable resource that we cannot afford to waste. So congratulations, you've won. As your prize, you have your own little plot of scorched earth. Enjoy! Van Isaac WS contribs 12:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I reverted your edit to Vasco da Gama, as the material you restored was excessive coverage of a film that, at best, rates a very brief mention as a bit of trivia. -- Donald Albury 19:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
In reply to this message left by you in on my talk page: "Please stop forcing your photos into the sunset article. A discussion has taken place here on what pictures to put in the article and images much better than yours were left out. Please understand that your status of professional photographer is not important here and that Wikipedia's articles are not showcases for our images". Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
My reply to you is this: I only continued to post the photo: Large Blue Joshua-B.jpg because I beleive a quality photo that enhances a page for which there is a perfectly good space open for it under the 1st photo, should not be deleted by another editor without the courtesy of at least a brief explanation. I finally squeezed one out of you yesterday. For that I am greatful. My feelings are not hurt over your comment about other images much better than mine were left out, because beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I don't think you're beholding too much. I can understand that everyone thinks they are a photographer; and everyone has a favorite Sunset photo they've taken. So I will respect your wishes and not re-post the photo, not because I don't think it adds to the beauty of the page; but that this section must be a Royal Pain in the Butt to keep under control; so I won't add to the confusion. Thank you for finally stepping forward and letting me know who has been deleting this photo. I truly believe that all removal of another's work deserves an explanation by the remover. By the way, in my short time here and only about 100 edits, I have NEVER removed another's photo or text, but only corrected grammer if I found an error; or added text to the already existing text; or a photo in a spot where I really thought it would enhance the page for the reader. Perhaps you can learn something from a New Guy. Pocketthis ( talk) 17:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Let me leave you with these thoughts to ponder about the Sunset section. First of all you've made it a RED page. There is every single color in the spectum at sunset during a variety of Atmospheric conditions. That is the main VOID on that page. Also, when a reader finds himself on the Sunset page, it is with the anticipation of seeing the most stunning photos of Sunsets that Wiki has in it's valt. There too is a BIG Void. My suggestion would be a Gallery section at the bottom of the page where an editor would be allowed to choose only 1 Sunset photo from his favorites to display if he is so inclined. This will solve all the issues you guys seem to be having with this section, and also leave it up to the READER to decide what is beautiful and what is boring. Because in my opinion......that page is a giant Bore. Thanks for your reply, Pocketthis ( talk) 19:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Sunset 2007-1.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
22:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
|
You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 ( talk) 13:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Pythagoras-2a.gif, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
|
"removing gallery of mostly sub-standard pictures"? well, I admit your photo is superb, and deserves all compliments, but why deleting all others? Such drastic action done by the only "survivor" may indicate some COI. With all due respect I would let an objective editor to decide about that. Perhaps you are right, after all. Perhaps not. Etan J. Tal 16:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etan J. Tal ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
valued picture status Your image,
File:Wasp August 2007-23.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Elekhh (
talk)
05:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
|
If that picture is kept on the article for one month, do you think it would stand a chance of getting promoted? -- Tyw7 ( ☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 09:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
valued picture status Your image,
File:Mosquito 2007-2.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
02:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
|
Hey, just to let you know that I listed File:WInd Rose Aguiar.png for delisting here to be replaced with this SVG version. I hope this is OK. Mahahahaneapneap ( talk) 15:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
I'll just mention that there are some new reply options for this question, which also serves as an example of how the poll should progress when none of the available options suit the contributors. The question on dealing with unclear consensus has apparently been the most controversial so far. I remain hopeful that we will succeed in representing people's opinions by the time the poll ends. Feel free to change your vote or add a new reply option if the three new ones still don't quite work for you. (But obviously, try to create something general enough that it's likely to gather a following.) Thank you. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 09:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Missing square edit.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 6, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-05-06. Yes, this is very late. I had put it in as a possibility for April Fool's Day, but it didn't get picked, and then I forgot about it again until now. howcheng { chat} 23:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Papaver April 2010-8a.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
|
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Papaver April 2010-13_crop.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
|
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Papaver April 2010-9.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Maedin\
talk
21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Maedin\ talk 21:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
[1] Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 17:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Torre Belém April 2009-4a.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 31, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-05-31. howcheng { chat} 17:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Porto Covo pano April 2009-4.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 16, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-06-16. howcheng { chat} 17:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Hoverfly January 2008-6.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 27, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-06-27. howcheng { chat} 16:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Cat-five suggested extending the voting period for undervisited, unanimously supported noms. I can't think of a way this system could be gamed, but thought I'd pass it by you as you seemed at previous discussions to have some expertise in game theory. Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 23:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety talk 06:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
I posted a few questions I had at Talk:Porto Covo, but no one seems to have acted on them. Since you seem to have edited the article heavily, perhaps you can take a look? Thanks. howcheng { chat} 18:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
That part of the text was there since the begining and I didn't understand its meaning either. It is simplified now. -- Alvesgaspar ( talk) 22:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() | You are being contacted because you have in the past participated in the Valued Picture project. The VPC project is suffering from a chronic lack of participation to the point that the project is at an impasse. A discussion is currently taking place about the future of this project and how to revitalize the project and participation. If you're interested in this project or have an idea of how to improve it please stop by and participate in the discussion. |
— raeky T 00:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Full moon detail1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Full moon detail2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Could you improve the translation of the article Transportes Aéreos da Índia Portuguesa? It has been translated from the Portugese Wikipedia to English, but needs some help from a native speaker. Thanks. -- 92.8.153.90 ( talk) 16:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
..............................................
Hi Alvesgaspar, The editor's page said I had to give you a notice that I had made a comment, so, here is your notice: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. on your comments on "edit warring".
I am new to Wikipedia, and I have not been part of any scientific edit warring, and I only want to use the drawings of why sunsets and sunrises are red and orange and peach colors. Wanbli-g53 ( talk) 02:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Wanbli-g53
Could it be helpful to inform also the people who recently partecipated to editing/discussion, that is
Grafen (
talk|
contribs),
Falcon8765 (
talk|
contribs),
Spiel496 (
talk|
contribs),
Kbrose (
talk|
contribs),
about the
thread ? --
GianniG46 (
talk)
13:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've emailed you. Tony (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Makeemlighter (
talk)
05:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Why do you keep removing the updated lifeguard photo? -- 71.200.70.155 ( talk) 21:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Umm, VP got shut down. (I know this is sort of a late response to your edit.) / ƒETCH COMMS / 22:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Cat November 2010-1a.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
23:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
|
Hi. I noticed you removed two labeled pictures from the page, on account of it being "low quality". I reversed your edit. The purpose of those pictures wasn't "quality" but the identification labels of the individuals on the monument. Until someone comes up with a better picture and does the labels, I believe it is useful to retain these. Walrasiad ( talk) 21:18, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Eu não sei o que posse dizer: monitorizar a página, editar excessivo imagens e registar as suas opiniões com a comunidade. Eventualmente o "blotting" vai ser viste por pessoas com mais experiença e ele não pode escapar. Tive problemas com o numero de páginas nesta página no passado, mas as adicicões recente foram excessivo. Fiz alguns editos hoje para diminuir, mas acho o minimo uma imagen por cada tema seria suficiente para comunicar as ideias (ou numa imagen também). Como ele tem uma historia de edição e colaboração no EN Wikipedia estou suprendido que o Caliphat123 não começe um diologo. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) ( talk) 09:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
I have unstruck the vote from the new user. Yeah, anonymous votes are typically ignored, which is bad enough to start with, but you feel we should extend this to the votes of new users? How should a new user offer an opinion, if not creating an account and then posting? If you have evidence that there's something up here, by all means, present it, but striking the vote of a new user (especially when the new user is supporting something you happen to oppose) just because they're new is more than a little bitey. J Milburn ( talk) 21:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Jorge Aguiar 1492 MR.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 10, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-06-10. howcheng { chat} 22:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Coreopsis July 2011-2.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
21:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Hi, Why did you change the infobox picture? How do you consider it more appropriate? -- Muhammad (talk) 02:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Alvesgapar. I am Portuguese and I know what I say about this topic. I will easily find a ton of references about anti-nuclear in Portugal and restore all the statements done before. I will remember you the Ferrel affair, near Peniche, in 1976, when the anti-nuclear movement, with the overwhelming support of the civil local population, defeated a project for the first nuclear power plant to be built in the country. Mr. Joca ( talk) 15:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Moscow July 2011-7a.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
00:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
|
When reporting editors to an Administrators' Noticeboard, you are required to post a notice to their talk page. You failed to do so in your complaint against User: Mr. Joca. I will place a notice for him; however, it is your responsibility to directly notify all involved parties when you report incidents to noticeboards. Van Isaac WS contribs 06:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Joaquim,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Pythagoras-2a.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 9, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-10-09. howcheng { chat} 16:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
For your wonderful picture of the day, File:Pythagoras-2a.gif, which proves everyone's favourite mathematical theorem in a simple and clear manner. The Cavalry ( Message me) 23:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
I agree. -- Raghith 04:43, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Actually, this incident is exhibit A in why I would have blocked you. The fact that you so egregiously violated WP:Don't bite the newbies that Mr. Joca has not returned in a month is exactly why we have such policies and why your actions and attitude are so disruptive. You have driven a prospective editor away from this project, and those editors are a valuable resource that we cannot afford to waste. So congratulations, you've won. As your prize, you have your own little plot of scorched earth. Enjoy! Van Isaac WS contribs 12:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I reverted your edit to Vasco da Gama, as the material you restored was excessive coverage of a film that, at best, rates a very brief mention as a bit of trivia. -- Donald Albury 19:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
In reply to this message left by you in on my talk page: "Please stop forcing your photos into the sunset article. A discussion has taken place here on what pictures to put in the article and images much better than yours were left out. Please understand that your status of professional photographer is not important here and that Wikipedia's articles are not showcases for our images". Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
My reply to you is this: I only continued to post the photo: Large Blue Joshua-B.jpg because I beleive a quality photo that enhances a page for which there is a perfectly good space open for it under the 1st photo, should not be deleted by another editor without the courtesy of at least a brief explanation. I finally squeezed one out of you yesterday. For that I am greatful. My feelings are not hurt over your comment about other images much better than mine were left out, because beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I don't think you're beholding too much. I can understand that everyone thinks they are a photographer; and everyone has a favorite Sunset photo they've taken. So I will respect your wishes and not re-post the photo, not because I don't think it adds to the beauty of the page; but that this section must be a Royal Pain in the Butt to keep under control; so I won't add to the confusion. Thank you for finally stepping forward and letting me know who has been deleting this photo. I truly believe that all removal of another's work deserves an explanation by the remover. By the way, in my short time here and only about 100 edits, I have NEVER removed another's photo or text, but only corrected grammer if I found an error; or added text to the already existing text; or a photo in a spot where I really thought it would enhance the page for the reader. Perhaps you can learn something from a New Guy. Pocketthis ( talk) 17:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Let me leave you with these thoughts to ponder about the Sunset section. First of all you've made it a RED page. There is every single color in the spectum at sunset during a variety of Atmospheric conditions. That is the main VOID on that page. Also, when a reader finds himself on the Sunset page, it is with the anticipation of seeing the most stunning photos of Sunsets that Wiki has in it's valt. There too is a BIG Void. My suggestion would be a Gallery section at the bottom of the page where an editor would be allowed to choose only 1 Sunset photo from his favorites to display if he is so inclined. This will solve all the issues you guys seem to be having with this section, and also leave it up to the READER to decide what is beautiful and what is boring. Because in my opinion......that page is a giant Bore. Thanks for your reply, Pocketthis ( talk) 19:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Sunset 2007-1.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Makeemlighter (
talk)
22:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
|
You are receiving this because of your current or past association with the Featured Pictures project. Following on from several cases where closers did not observe the prescribed minimum votes required for a delisting, there is now a motion to entirely dismiss the requirement for a minimum. Please participate in the discussion as wide-ranging changes may arise. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 ( talk) 13:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)