|
Please stop adding prod tags the way you are. You are not respecting our processes (such as the one where you added it to a foreign language article already listed at Pages needed translation. Also, the way you are inserting them in the middle of articles is improper. Since you're brand new here, take some time to get a feel for the place before you start trying to delete stuff, otherwise someone might think you're trying to vandalize. Thanks. 23:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Nice username :) -- Alynna 03:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
AfD debate about the issue for which you dePRODed that article. DMacks 05:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome message. I have however been editing Wikipedia since November 2004; you're a bit late. - Ashley Pomeroy 19:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Nishkid64 ( talk) 01:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
hegfdgvg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.129.138 ( talk) 01:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mexican standoff. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors.
Carlosguitar
16:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to
Aquatic ape hypothesis, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
Agüeybaná
00:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Please stop adding prod tags the way you are. You are not respecting our processes (such as the one where you added it to a foreign language article already listed at Pages needed translation. Also, the way you are inserting them in the middle of articles is improper. Since you're brand new here, take some time to get a feel for the place before you start trying to delete stuff, otherwise someone might think you're trying to vandalize. Thanks. 23:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Nice username :) -- Alynna 03:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
AfD debate about the issue for which you dePRODed that article. DMacks 05:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome message. I have however been editing Wikipedia since November 2004; you're a bit late. - Ashley Pomeroy 19:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Nishkid64 ( talk) 01:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
hegfdgvg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.129.138 ( talk) 01:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Mexican standoff. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors.
Carlosguitar
16:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to
Aquatic ape hypothesis, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
Agüeybaná
00:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)