![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
You have previously warned this person, telling them one more time and they'd be blocked. I'm not sure if what they've done today is considered vandalism by Wikipedia, but you might want to check them out. -- 74.129.14.90 02:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
... vandalized. Te ke 03:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm awaiting a response from you on the talk page. Thanks. Zos 03:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey man. I reverted some vandalism on your user page- which means you must be doing something right :) Keep up the good work!
iso 639 language codes. this is wrong. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
I didn't create this article, but I was a little bit alarmed at how fast you jumped on deleting it. Maybe wait a minute...I was just starting to put up a hangon when you took it down. It was created as an attack, but I had removed the attacking part and made it a stub about a reputable (I think) company.
Oh yeah, congrats on getting admin. -- Alphachimp talk 04:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thankyou for reverting vandalism edits to my userpage. It is apreciated. - Mike Beckham 05:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
You sent me a message for removing content. I was just in the process of sorting votes on an Article Deletion page. Take a look again at the Protest Warrior deletion page. Any additional sorting would be appreciated, as the article is a mess, and there are some double votes as well. 71.246.245.50 06:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
I am writing up a report on the recent massive vandalism attack we just had and that you were a massive help to. If you have anything to add I'll be working on it at User:mboverload/vandalattack -- mboverload @ 06:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted vandalism on Uwe Boll using VandalProof recently. Of course I commend vandal fighting, but I noticed that you reverted to a version before my edit. Was this intentional? I dont think it was, and I understand how easy it is to make mistakes in the heat of vandal fighting. I'm going to change it back to my version. If you object let me know here, I'll watch your page. Nscheffey( T/ C) 06:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
72.197.168.91 was blocked for user page vandalism. Keep up your excellent anti-vandal efforts. They are appreciated. -- Samir धर्म 07:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, AOL vandalism is a pain in the butt to put it mildly. I removed the last batch of AOL IPs since they hadn't been used for the last half hour... most likely the vandal had moved on to other IPs. Please keep reporting them though. While there may not always be an admin watching at the right time we might be able to stop a few in the act. If you'd like I can also semiprotect your user page or any articles the vandal seems to favor. - Loren 07:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Obviously an anon IP can't sort AfD votes, but do you think the community would trust me to do it? I have 1500 edits and other than moving comments to talk, I haven't commented or voted on that particular AfD. Still, I wanted a second opinion first.-- Kchase02 T 07:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. I did my best to defuse. Unfortunately, I wasn't supposed to even be sorting votes on AfD pages, and I've since been reverted. Oh well, at least the comments are cleaned-up (even that's a faux pas, but in this circumstance, I think it's better).-- Kchase02 T 21:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I kinda know what Im doing, but I wanted to put a picture there, just figuring put how to upload it now —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.184.153 ( talk • contribs)
( Not cure If I´m doing that right, but I don´t know how to contact you else ) Digimon: Furimon When first translating the name of Frymon, it was assumed that his name was Furimon, since that would be the direct translation of the Kanji. However, when the official profile was added, it turned out that his name was Frymon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.211.166 ( talk • contribs)
Here is the japanese Profile:
http://www10.channel.or.jp/digimon/accel/evo/pic.php3?type=j&id=1_495
フリモン = Furimon. フ = Fu リ=ri モ= mo ン=n
Therefore Frymon ( or to be correct: Frimon ) and Furimon are the same Digimon.
Hey. New user to Wikipedia here. I come in peace. I made a place holder article (stub?) for Academic Detailing that was a copy from a scientific journal article (JAMA is the journal.) It was flagged to be deleted because it was copywritten. Based on my very limited understanding of copyright law, I decided to err on the side of caution and take it down, replacing it with (mostly) original text. I don't think that this is vandalism.
The Avorn Boys 17:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC) avornboys (nate)
Perhaps there's a clever way to respond to your response in a threaded manner. I'll look into that.
With regards to not removing a speedy deletion notice, noted. With regards to your points, noted. Learning by doing here, as I read through the tutorial and guidelines. Thanks for your input. All the best. The Avorn Boys 17:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
...for reverting the vandalism on my user page, and for telling me about it! Waggers 19:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Five pillars "Wikipedia uses the neutral point-of-view, which means we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view; presenting each point of view accurately; providing context for any given point of view, so that readers understand whose view the point represents; and presenting no one point of view as "the truth" or "the best view." It means citing verifiable, authoritative sources whenever possible, especially on controversial topics."
There are two different opinions on the root cause of the infamous article in the National Post newspaper about "2006 Iranian sumptuary law controversy". Only an official National Post explanation is presented currently on Wikipedia.
Wouldn't it be beneficial for wikipedia readers to know that "Asper was above anything else an unabashed Zionist and a proud Jew" (according to CBC http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_zolf/20031007.html)? This information might help to better understand the probable origin of this error. Is such reference to a government owned Canadian media corporation acceptable at Wikipedia?
I am asking these questions because my original modification was removed by Alphachimp: "17:45, 18 June 2006 Alphachimp m (Reverted edits by 216.99.56.17 (talk) to version 56571174 by Trooperscoop using VandalProof) "
Jhnppv 23:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Alphachimp, is this a politically correct version?
The following Larry Zolf quote might be helpful in understanding the root cause of the infamous "Iranian sumptuary law" publication by the National Post: "Asper was above anything else an unabashed Zionist and a proud Jew. ... Today Izzy's National Post is the most strident pro-Israel newspaper in the country [Canada] ..." http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_zolf/20031007.html
Jhnppv 03:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for voting! Hello Alphachimp/Archive 3, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 25 | 19 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, edits like this one are a waste of your time and WP resources. Use AWB for valuable repetitive tasks. examples include, common spelling mistakes, stub sorting, substing templates, adding stub tags to pages in Special:Shortpages, etc. - CrazyRussian talk/ email 14:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Alphachimp, and thanks for voting in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of (68/19/3). I appreciated your comments, which I hope to take on board in order to gain your respect in my work as an administrator. Best of luck in your continued editing of the encyclopedia! Sam Vimes 19:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there.
Advertising and spam is not a speedy deletion category. (I tried to make it so once, but it hasn't gotten enough support.) Please use prod if something you want deleted doesn't fall under one of the established WP:CSD categories. Thanks. Grand master ka 03:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Back before I went on a wikihiatus nobody ever paid attention to the freemasonry pages, it's great to see that some people really do care about the encyclopedia :P Seraphim 05:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I like the welcome you posted to User:Kjb19841984. Where can I get the template for this message? Please reply on my talk. - Mgm| (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thanks for conspiring with real software to commit consumer fraud with its product realbasic. Using Wiki to shill a commercial with knowingly false information is fraud! Letting Real software employees edit their own article is fraud as this is not an indepent source of information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.0.72.236 ( talk • contribs)
Removing wrong warning message. Thanks for experimenting with my talk page. 82.182.82.20 02:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:82.182.82.20 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. RmB 03:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
You have put a prod tag on this article (i.e. for deletion). Please note it was nominated for AFD on May 27, 2006. See discussion. In the light of this, you might like to discuss your objections on the article talk page before proceeding further. Thanks, Crum375 19:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Alphachimp, please do me a favor and stay in this Talk page to make this discussion easier to follow (I'll have you on my Watch list). Please read the WP:PROD policy. I think you may be confusing it with WP:AFD. There are some important distinctions between them. For prod, anyone (anon IP or not) may remove the notice, and it is highly recommended to explain why in the Edit note. If the original prod inserter still believes the deletion is justified, it is his/her prerogative to follow up with an AFD nomination, but never by re-inserting the prod notice. OTOH, with AFD, only Admins may remove it, after some due process, the shortest of which is 'Speedy Keep'. Please note that these are important distinctions, and I have no ax to grind at all with you - you seem to be interested in doing the right thing, which is very much appreciated. If you still think I am wrong after having read the relevant policies, please feel free to follow up. Thanks, Crum375 20:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Why are you removing wikilinks and wikidates? If this is part of some new policy initiative why doesn't your edit summary point to the policy? -- Geo Swan 20:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Here. I believe it would always be a mistake to unlike wikidates, because the wikipedia counts on dates being in the wikidate format in order to allow readers to choose their preferred format for date presentation.
Further explanation to follow. -- Geo Swan 20:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Alpachimp,
Have you any friends? Best Wishes, Hernan Crespo
I don't think so Hernan. Cheers, Lionel Messi
Well played the other day. Yeah, that Alphachimp definitely has no friends. Regards, Juan Pablo Sorin
He does have a few friends, but no friends on the Argentine World Cup squad 2006. Many Thanks, Javier Saviola
We were all quite friendly with him in the 2002 World Cup squad, but we slightly blamed him for going out at the first round. Yours, Gabriel Batistuta —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.162.140 ( talk • contribs)
why on earth did that anonymous editer do such a thing like that? i am really glad you reverted it back. thanks very much! Touth 23:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me, May I ask you something? Because I have some questions on Wikipedia. Today, I've noticed that there is the sentence at the top of the pages. Like this. Early registration for Wikimania 2006 is open until July 9. Scholarships are available;applications are due by June 28. Could you explain to me what the top means? I'm just curious. So, answer in my talk-page. Please. *~Daniel~* 04:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your warnings on User talk:59.184.176.197 - is there any automatic way to get the diff showing the reverted version? Does it something have to do with vandalproof? Please reply on my talkpage. Thanks in advance, -- Gurubrahma 16:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that a clean-up tag had been inserted into the article I entered on John Rowan(psychologist). I'm new to Wikipedia. Can you tell me what that clean-up tag means. I don't understand what about the article isn't adequate. I notice that the tag has a "June" date - is there a time-sensitive nature to the tag? Thanks, SteveWolfer 22:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC) p.s. - shouldn't there be a 'root' page for "John Rowan" where you could chose between a page for John Rowan(congressman) and John Rowan(psychologist)?
Thse two are the same Digimon. I already proved that, so why was it not changed ? ((unsigned|80.137.249.232}}
Hello! I'm new to Wikipedia and wanted to help on an article you recently tagged as needing cleanup. It's this article: Jayne Cobb What things jumped out at you as needing work? I can then try and tackle those, thanks! - plange 00:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
User:RevolverOcelotX is just trying to bully me around because he wants to put a copyrighted image on the Bruce Lee article. Stop reverting back to his edits.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.114.26) ( talk • contribs)
Im sure you don't know User:RevolverOcelotX but he does this all the time. He bullies people around by putting 3rr tags, NPOV tags, and Vandalism tags. RevolverOcelotX is a troll.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.114.26) ( talk • contribs)
He keeps putting on those tags because YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO REMOVE THEM FROM YOUR TALK PAGE ONCE YOU HAVE RECIVED WARNINGS °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 00:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
You are an idiot °≈§→Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈°. My statement clearly implies that none of the tags are valid in the first place. Thereby making him a troll.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.114.26) ( talk • contribs)
And plus, If im an idiot, then Why would I know the rules that you cant remove your warnings, and you didnt? °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 00:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Just take a look at your grammar. Hahahahaha.
That still Doesnt make me an idiot. I did that on purpose because Im too lazy to type apostriphies on the internet °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 01:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I already have an account. However, I never use it on the Bruce Lee article because I don't want my talk page filling up with RevolverOcelotX's crap.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RevolverOcelotX
Let me clue you in on what User:RevolverOcelotX does. Whenever he is angry with an edit someone makes he starts reverting that users edits in other articles. All my warnings against RevolverOcelotX are valid unlike his warnings. So how can you say I am attacking him? I am the victim. Not only does he do this to me, he does this to everyone else. Now that I am more familiar with Wikipedia, I will avenge all the users he has harassed in the past. To this day RevolverOcelotX continues to bother other users. Now it's time to return the favor.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 ( talk • contribs) .
You're Nuts http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&target=71.124.114.26
You are welcome to verify ALL my warnings.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 ( talk • contribs) .
RevolverOcelotX has also cut and paste all my valid warnings on my userpage. Those must be verified as well.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 ( talk • contribs) .
My Opinion
Good comments, and I do agree with Alphachimp, You two need to stay away from each other. °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 07:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Alphachimp, you asked for my thoughts. My comment is that the anonymous user is not acting productively but this must always be considered in the context of RevolverOcelotX's equally provocative and uncivil behavior. He uses any opportunity he has to instigate and exacerbate wars, many of which he initiates, over the most trivial of things. The very latest case in point was his removal of the anon's comments from his talk page on the basis that my comments (which were truncated, but attributed) were posted by the anon, which is a common practice on Wikipedia. So not only does he delete the quote of mine, he deletes the quote of the anon. This is uncivil behavior that only serves to escalate the situation. There is an unfortunate tendency of some users to judge a user much more lenient if they are using a registered name at the moment rather than editing anonymously, but observers and those who must intervene should carefully consider the facts of the dispute rather than simply the visibility of the parties involved. YINever 07:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
User:RevolverOcelotX is deleting my warnings on his talk page! 71.124.114.26 17:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Even if they are invalid you cannot remove them. I merely reverted the warnings User:RevolverOcelotX removed and added warnings for removing those warnings. 71.124.114.26 17:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Removing warnings off a userpage are considered vandalism. Therefore the 3RR does not apply. 71.124.114.26 17:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Again, the final warning does not apply because you are not allowed to delete warnings in the first place. 71.124.114.26 18:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, it took me about an hour to make it and get the HTML Tags correct °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 00:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Bullshit, this is an obvious insult to the intelligence of any spined creature. The guys that gave this report were obviously serving the army all their lives being cannon folder and if they were good little cretins they would have the privilage to have their heads serve as wall breaker. A report from the guys that found German con camps unhuman but on the other hand having even worse for POWs, by that we see how this all is kind of retarded, it's a custom in all other healthy societies to respect the people of the views (our view cannot be the best yet, but we now see the omissions of that era) to respect a soldier, the same way that Germans did (Nazi), they at least were human in this, but the United States of the Wolf-Fucker needs to be equal in unhumanity to the Soviet Union, the Soviets lost 20 millions of their boys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.152.224.154 ( talk • contribs)
Honestly I forgot ;-). All done now. Prodego talk 01:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, there is a user, Bonafide.hustla ( talk · contribs), who is repeatedly deleting 3RR warnings from his talk page and is close to breaking the 3RR on List of Chinese Americans. Can you take a look at this? Thanks -- RevolverOcelotX 00:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I did not break the 3RR. I made one revert on the article when RevolverOcelotX placed the warning on my talkpage. Then made 2 more edits, when RevolverOcelotx placed POV info on the article. Thanks for your time.-- Bonafide.hustla 00:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Dude, I know what vandalism is. I really think you're making too big of a deal about it, and you shouldn't have sent me that message. I hate Paul Edinger with a passion, and I think what he does is annoying, is all.
The warning is not justified on the ground that I only made one edits in the last 24 hrs in that particular article when RevolverOcelotx placed it on my talkpage. RevolverOcelotX is the one who's doing POV pushing. Thanks for your time and sorry to take up so much space on your talkpage. :P-- Bonafide.hustla 01:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I only made 1 edit when you placed the 3RR tag on my talkpage. Therefore, it's not justified. Plese stop vandalizing my talkpage.-- Bonafide.hustla 01:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 26 | 26 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
You have previously warned this person, telling them one more time and they'd be blocked. I'm not sure if what they've done today is considered vandalism by Wikipedia, but you might want to check them out. -- 74.129.14.90 02:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
... vandalized. Te ke 03:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm awaiting a response from you on the talk page. Thanks. Zos 03:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey man. I reverted some vandalism on your user page- which means you must be doing something right :) Keep up the good work!
iso 639 language codes. this is wrong. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
I didn't create this article, but I was a little bit alarmed at how fast you jumped on deleting it. Maybe wait a minute...I was just starting to put up a hangon when you took it down. It was created as an attack, but I had removed the attacking part and made it a stub about a reputable (I think) company.
Oh yeah, congrats on getting admin. -- Alphachimp talk 04:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thankyou for reverting vandalism edits to my userpage. It is apreciated. - Mike Beckham 05:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
You sent me a message for removing content. I was just in the process of sorting votes on an Article Deletion page. Take a look again at the Protest Warrior deletion page. Any additional sorting would be appreciated, as the article is a mess, and there are some double votes as well. 71.246.245.50 06:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
I am writing up a report on the recent massive vandalism attack we just had and that you were a massive help to. If you have anything to add I'll be working on it at User:mboverload/vandalattack -- mboverload @ 06:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted vandalism on Uwe Boll using VandalProof recently. Of course I commend vandal fighting, but I noticed that you reverted to a version before my edit. Was this intentional? I dont think it was, and I understand how easy it is to make mistakes in the heat of vandal fighting. I'm going to change it back to my version. If you object let me know here, I'll watch your page. Nscheffey( T/ C) 06:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
72.197.168.91 was blocked for user page vandalism. Keep up your excellent anti-vandal efforts. They are appreciated. -- Samir धर्म 07:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, AOL vandalism is a pain in the butt to put it mildly. I removed the last batch of AOL IPs since they hadn't been used for the last half hour... most likely the vandal had moved on to other IPs. Please keep reporting them though. While there may not always be an admin watching at the right time we might be able to stop a few in the act. If you'd like I can also semiprotect your user page or any articles the vandal seems to favor. - Loren 07:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Obviously an anon IP can't sort AfD votes, but do you think the community would trust me to do it? I have 1500 edits and other than moving comments to talk, I haven't commented or voted on that particular AfD. Still, I wanted a second opinion first.-- Kchase02 T 07:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. I did my best to defuse. Unfortunately, I wasn't supposed to even be sorting votes on AfD pages, and I've since been reverted. Oh well, at least the comments are cleaned-up (even that's a faux pas, but in this circumstance, I think it's better).-- Kchase02 T 21:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I kinda know what Im doing, but I wanted to put a picture there, just figuring put how to upload it now —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.184.153 ( talk • contribs)
( Not cure If I´m doing that right, but I don´t know how to contact you else ) Digimon: Furimon When first translating the name of Frymon, it was assumed that his name was Furimon, since that would be the direct translation of the Kanji. However, when the official profile was added, it turned out that his name was Frymon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.211.166 ( talk • contribs)
Here is the japanese Profile:
http://www10.channel.or.jp/digimon/accel/evo/pic.php3?type=j&id=1_495
フリモン = Furimon. フ = Fu リ=ri モ= mo ン=n
Therefore Frymon ( or to be correct: Frimon ) and Furimon are the same Digimon.
Hey. New user to Wikipedia here. I come in peace. I made a place holder article (stub?) for Academic Detailing that was a copy from a scientific journal article (JAMA is the journal.) It was flagged to be deleted because it was copywritten. Based on my very limited understanding of copyright law, I decided to err on the side of caution and take it down, replacing it with (mostly) original text. I don't think that this is vandalism.
The Avorn Boys 17:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC) avornboys (nate)
Perhaps there's a clever way to respond to your response in a threaded manner. I'll look into that.
With regards to not removing a speedy deletion notice, noted. With regards to your points, noted. Learning by doing here, as I read through the tutorial and guidelines. Thanks for your input. All the best. The Avorn Boys 17:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
...for reverting the vandalism on my user page, and for telling me about it! Waggers 19:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Five pillars "Wikipedia uses the neutral point-of-view, which means we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view; presenting each point of view accurately; providing context for any given point of view, so that readers understand whose view the point represents; and presenting no one point of view as "the truth" or "the best view." It means citing verifiable, authoritative sources whenever possible, especially on controversial topics."
There are two different opinions on the root cause of the infamous article in the National Post newspaper about "2006 Iranian sumptuary law controversy". Only an official National Post explanation is presented currently on Wikipedia.
Wouldn't it be beneficial for wikipedia readers to know that "Asper was above anything else an unabashed Zionist and a proud Jew" (according to CBC http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_zolf/20031007.html)? This information might help to better understand the probable origin of this error. Is such reference to a government owned Canadian media corporation acceptable at Wikipedia?
I am asking these questions because my original modification was removed by Alphachimp: "17:45, 18 June 2006 Alphachimp m (Reverted edits by 216.99.56.17 (talk) to version 56571174 by Trooperscoop using VandalProof) "
Jhnppv 23:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Alphachimp, is this a politically correct version?
The following Larry Zolf quote might be helpful in understanding the root cause of the infamous "Iranian sumptuary law" publication by the National Post: "Asper was above anything else an unabashed Zionist and a proud Jew. ... Today Izzy's National Post is the most strident pro-Israel newspaper in the country [Canada] ..." http://www.cbc.ca/news/viewpoint/vp_zolf/20031007.html
Jhnppv 03:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for voting! Hello Alphachimp/Archive 3, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:46, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 25 | 19 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, edits like this one are a waste of your time and WP resources. Use AWB for valuable repetitive tasks. examples include, common spelling mistakes, stub sorting, substing templates, adding stub tags to pages in Special:Shortpages, etc. - CrazyRussian talk/ email 14:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Alphachimp, and thanks for voting in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of (68/19/3). I appreciated your comments, which I hope to take on board in order to gain your respect in my work as an administrator. Best of luck in your continued editing of the encyclopedia! Sam Vimes 19:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there.
Advertising and spam is not a speedy deletion category. (I tried to make it so once, but it hasn't gotten enough support.) Please use prod if something you want deleted doesn't fall under one of the established WP:CSD categories. Thanks. Grand master ka 03:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Back before I went on a wikihiatus nobody ever paid attention to the freemasonry pages, it's great to see that some people really do care about the encyclopedia :P Seraphim 05:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I like the welcome you posted to User:Kjb19841984. Where can I get the template for this message? Please reply on my talk. - Mgm| (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thanks for conspiring with real software to commit consumer fraud with its product realbasic. Using Wiki to shill a commercial with knowingly false information is fraud! Letting Real software employees edit their own article is fraud as this is not an indepent source of information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.0.72.236 ( talk • contribs)
Removing wrong warning message. Thanks for experimenting with my talk page. 82.182.82.20 02:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:82.182.82.20 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. RmB 03:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
You have put a prod tag on this article (i.e. for deletion). Please note it was nominated for AFD on May 27, 2006. See discussion. In the light of this, you might like to discuss your objections on the article talk page before proceeding further. Thanks, Crum375 19:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Alphachimp, please do me a favor and stay in this Talk page to make this discussion easier to follow (I'll have you on my Watch list). Please read the WP:PROD policy. I think you may be confusing it with WP:AFD. There are some important distinctions between them. For prod, anyone (anon IP or not) may remove the notice, and it is highly recommended to explain why in the Edit note. If the original prod inserter still believes the deletion is justified, it is his/her prerogative to follow up with an AFD nomination, but never by re-inserting the prod notice. OTOH, with AFD, only Admins may remove it, after some due process, the shortest of which is 'Speedy Keep'. Please note that these are important distinctions, and I have no ax to grind at all with you - you seem to be interested in doing the right thing, which is very much appreciated. If you still think I am wrong after having read the relevant policies, please feel free to follow up. Thanks, Crum375 20:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Why are you removing wikilinks and wikidates? If this is part of some new policy initiative why doesn't your edit summary point to the policy? -- Geo Swan 20:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Here. I believe it would always be a mistake to unlike wikidates, because the wikipedia counts on dates being in the wikidate format in order to allow readers to choose their preferred format for date presentation.
Further explanation to follow. -- Geo Swan 20:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Alpachimp,
Have you any friends? Best Wishes, Hernan Crespo
I don't think so Hernan. Cheers, Lionel Messi
Well played the other day. Yeah, that Alphachimp definitely has no friends. Regards, Juan Pablo Sorin
He does have a few friends, but no friends on the Argentine World Cup squad 2006. Many Thanks, Javier Saviola
We were all quite friendly with him in the 2002 World Cup squad, but we slightly blamed him for going out at the first round. Yours, Gabriel Batistuta —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.162.140 ( talk • contribs)
why on earth did that anonymous editer do such a thing like that? i am really glad you reverted it back. thanks very much! Touth 23:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me, May I ask you something? Because I have some questions on Wikipedia. Today, I've noticed that there is the sentence at the top of the pages. Like this. Early registration for Wikimania 2006 is open until July 9. Scholarships are available;applications are due by June 28. Could you explain to me what the top means? I'm just curious. So, answer in my talk-page. Please. *~Daniel~* 04:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your warnings on User talk:59.184.176.197 - is there any automatic way to get the diff showing the reverted version? Does it something have to do with vandalproof? Please reply on my talkpage. Thanks in advance, -- Gurubrahma 16:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that a clean-up tag had been inserted into the article I entered on John Rowan(psychologist). I'm new to Wikipedia. Can you tell me what that clean-up tag means. I don't understand what about the article isn't adequate. I notice that the tag has a "June" date - is there a time-sensitive nature to the tag? Thanks, SteveWolfer 22:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC) p.s. - shouldn't there be a 'root' page for "John Rowan" where you could chose between a page for John Rowan(congressman) and John Rowan(psychologist)?
Thse two are the same Digimon. I already proved that, so why was it not changed ? ((unsigned|80.137.249.232}}
Hello! I'm new to Wikipedia and wanted to help on an article you recently tagged as needing cleanup. It's this article: Jayne Cobb What things jumped out at you as needing work? I can then try and tackle those, thanks! - plange 00:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
User:RevolverOcelotX is just trying to bully me around because he wants to put a copyrighted image on the Bruce Lee article. Stop reverting back to his edits.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.114.26) ( talk • contribs)
Im sure you don't know User:RevolverOcelotX but he does this all the time. He bullies people around by putting 3rr tags, NPOV tags, and Vandalism tags. RevolverOcelotX is a troll.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.114.26) ( talk • contribs)
He keeps putting on those tags because YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO REMOVE THEM FROM YOUR TALK PAGE ONCE YOU HAVE RECIVED WARNINGS °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 00:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
You are an idiot °≈§→Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈°. My statement clearly implies that none of the tags are valid in the first place. Thereby making him a troll.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.114.26) ( talk • contribs)
And plus, If im an idiot, then Why would I know the rules that you cant remove your warnings, and you didnt? °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 00:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Just take a look at your grammar. Hahahahaha.
That still Doesnt make me an idiot. I did that on purpose because Im too lazy to type apostriphies on the internet °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 01:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I already have an account. However, I never use it on the Bruce Lee article because I don't want my talk page filling up with RevolverOcelotX's crap.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RevolverOcelotX
Let me clue you in on what User:RevolverOcelotX does. Whenever he is angry with an edit someone makes he starts reverting that users edits in other articles. All my warnings against RevolverOcelotX are valid unlike his warnings. So how can you say I am attacking him? I am the victim. Not only does he do this to me, he does this to everyone else. Now that I am more familiar with Wikipedia, I will avenge all the users he has harassed in the past. To this day RevolverOcelotX continues to bother other users. Now it's time to return the favor.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 ( talk • contribs) .
You're Nuts http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&target=71.124.114.26
You are welcome to verify ALL my warnings.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 ( talk • contribs) .
RevolverOcelotX has also cut and paste all my valid warnings on my userpage. Those must be verified as well.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 ( talk • contribs) .
My Opinion
Good comments, and I do agree with Alphachimp, You two need to stay away from each other. °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 07:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Alphachimp, you asked for my thoughts. My comment is that the anonymous user is not acting productively but this must always be considered in the context of RevolverOcelotX's equally provocative and uncivil behavior. He uses any opportunity he has to instigate and exacerbate wars, many of which he initiates, over the most trivial of things. The very latest case in point was his removal of the anon's comments from his talk page on the basis that my comments (which were truncated, but attributed) were posted by the anon, which is a common practice on Wikipedia. So not only does he delete the quote of mine, he deletes the quote of the anon. This is uncivil behavior that only serves to escalate the situation. There is an unfortunate tendency of some users to judge a user much more lenient if they are using a registered name at the moment rather than editing anonymously, but observers and those who must intervene should carefully consider the facts of the dispute rather than simply the visibility of the parties involved. YINever 07:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
User:RevolverOcelotX is deleting my warnings on his talk page! 71.124.114.26 17:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Even if they are invalid you cannot remove them. I merely reverted the warnings User:RevolverOcelotX removed and added warnings for removing those warnings. 71.124.114.26 17:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Removing warnings off a userpage are considered vandalism. Therefore the 3RR does not apply. 71.124.114.26 17:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Again, the final warning does not apply because you are not allowed to delete warnings in the first place. 71.124.114.26 18:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, it took me about an hour to make it and get the HTML Tags correct °≈§→ Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈° Talk 00:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Bullshit, this is an obvious insult to the intelligence of any spined creature. The guys that gave this report were obviously serving the army all their lives being cannon folder and if they were good little cretins they would have the privilage to have their heads serve as wall breaker. A report from the guys that found German con camps unhuman but on the other hand having even worse for POWs, by that we see how this all is kind of retarded, it's a custom in all other healthy societies to respect the people of the views (our view cannot be the best yet, but we now see the omissions of that era) to respect a soldier, the same way that Germans did (Nazi), they at least were human in this, but the United States of the Wolf-Fucker needs to be equal in unhumanity to the Soviet Union, the Soviets lost 20 millions of their boys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.152.224.154 ( talk • contribs)
Honestly I forgot ;-). All done now. Prodego talk 01:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, there is a user, Bonafide.hustla ( talk · contribs), who is repeatedly deleting 3RR warnings from his talk page and is close to breaking the 3RR on List of Chinese Americans. Can you take a look at this? Thanks -- RevolverOcelotX 00:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I did not break the 3RR. I made one revert on the article when RevolverOcelotX placed the warning on my talkpage. Then made 2 more edits, when RevolverOcelotx placed POV info on the article. Thanks for your time.-- Bonafide.hustla 00:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Dude, I know what vandalism is. I really think you're making too big of a deal about it, and you shouldn't have sent me that message. I hate Paul Edinger with a passion, and I think what he does is annoying, is all.
The warning is not justified on the ground that I only made one edits in the last 24 hrs in that particular article when RevolverOcelotx placed it on my talkpage. RevolverOcelotX is the one who's doing POV pushing. Thanks for your time and sorry to take up so much space on your talkpage. :P-- Bonafide.hustla 01:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I only made 1 edit when you placed the 3RR tag on my talkpage. Therefore, it's not justified. Plese stop vandalizing my talkpage.-- Bonafide.hustla 01:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 26 | 26 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)