Archieves | |
---|---|
As an expert on
Northern Cyprus and Eastern Mediterranean, I have edits in all of the following Wikipedia pages since 2010:
Northern Cyprus,
Talk:Northern Cyprus,
Turkey
Politics:
Foreign relations of Northern Cyprus,
Cyprus dispute,
Cypriot intercommunal violence,
United Nations Security Council Resolution 541,
2014 Cyprus Joint Declaration,
Human rights in Northern Cyprus,
Exclusive economic zone,
Mediterranean Oil Dispute,
Military of Northern Cyprus,
List of Republics
Demography:
Population transfer,
Population exchange between Greek and Turkish Cypriots,
Cypriot refugees,
Template:PopulationChartUnder1m,
List of countries by population,
List of sovereign states and dependent territories by population density,
Locations:
Mediterranean Sea,
Template:Municipalities of Northern Cyprus,
Kyrenia,
Güzelyurt District,
Morphou,
Famagusta,
Trikomo, Cyprus,
Ayios Andronikos, Cyprus,
Ayios Seryios, Cyprus,
Lefka,
Karpass Peninsula,
Bellapais
Transportation:
Ercan International Airport,
Nicosia International Airport
Education:
Education in Northern Cyprus,
Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus,
Cyprus International University,
University of Kyrenia
Sports:
Sport in Northern Cyprus,
World Pool-Billiard Association,
European Pocket Billiard Federation,
European Cyclists' Federation,
Paragliding,
Professional Football Leagues
Geography:
List of countries by easternmost point,
Pentadaktylos,
List of countries by highest point,
List of islands of Northern Cyprus,
List of islands#Europe
Culture:
List of top international rankings by country,
Bayrak (TV Channel of Northern Cyprus)
Religion:
Religions by country,
Religion in Europe,
Religion in Northern Cyprus
Tourism:
Tourism in Northern Cyprus
Others:
North Cyprus Red Crescent Society,
Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 November 26 (Is Northern Cyprus a Eurasian country?),
Cittaslow
Files: Long Beach Trikomo.jpg
United States Federal Court: "..Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots....Although the United States does not recognize it as a state, the TRNC purportedly operates as a democratic republic with a president, prime minister, legislature and judiciary...TRNC is not vulnerable to a lawsuit in Washington". Source. Alexyflemming ( talk) 14:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.
|
---|
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
|
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Diannaa (
talk) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Your long-term disruptive approach to editing on the topic of Cyprus is the reason for your block. Wikipedia is not the place to push a particular point of view on a subject. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive. Recent examples of edit warring: History of Northern Cyprus, Modern history of Cyprus, Northern Cyprus. -- Diannaa ( talk) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Alexyflemming ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
A. Diannaa, yes,
it is "Cyprus", not "Cypress"...
B. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas:
I defended that neutral point in various places and offered the usage of "neutral phrasing used by United Nations to describe the things in Cyprus dispute":
C. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive:
So, let you block every Wiki user that tries to explain things as much as clear? Lengthness of posts cannot be a blocking reason alone.
D. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive:
I am not the 3RR violator. See the timeline of edits last time carefully to solve who violated 3RR for example:
15.10.2014:07.43:
I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)
15.10.2014:07.48:
Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.
........
15.10.2014:07.47:
Dr.Κ. also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "
edit-war against consensus. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ".
But,
Dr.Κ. distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!
14.10.2014; 20.16: (my first edit) after
my first edit
14.10.2014:20.30: an
unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".
14.10.2014:21.42:
Wikipedian Alexikoua reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism. (edit summary of
Alexikoua: "rv essential part removal").
Alexikoua is a Hellen, but neutral like me.
15.10.2014:00.38: Wikipedian
MelbourneStar
reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.
15.10.2014:05.23: Arbitration Committee rejected
Dr.K.:
Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.
|
---|
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
|
15.10.2014:07.45:
I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users (Alexikoua,MelbourneStar).
15.10.2014:07.47:
Dr.K. reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"
E. There is a very clear Distortion of History of one of the related parties:
a.
(09.02.2014) "hiding the name of the principal initiator of that war";
Dr.Κ.: "The term "1974 Cyprus War" is misleading because it hides the name of the principal initiator of that war, which is Turkey"
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below:
Britannica: In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? Are
|
b.
(03.03.2014) island nation of Cyprus;
Dr.Κ.: "Historically, the island and the island nation of Cyprus have been considered to be the same."
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts even beginners know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian. As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know):
|
c.
(03.11.2014) "forcible eviction".
Dr.Κ.: ""Northern Cyprus" ....is the result of forcible population evictions".
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
|
F. Since this "Distortion of History" is revealed very clearly, that related party used every insulting word towards me:
Dr.K. said
"Silly" to me.
Neo ^ said
"Paid Supporter" to me.
Despite all these insulting words, I protected my common sense, and did not respond them in the way they are accustomed towards me.
Alexyflemming (
talk) 20:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
None of the volunteer administators are likely to try to follow this huge pile of links and comments. Feel free to make another unblock request, preferably adhering to our guide to appealing blocks. 21:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpgordon ( talk • contribs)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Alexy flemmings Carl B. 7 days ago United Nations Reports the other way around! There are proofs of the fact that Greek Cypriots are applying brutal ethnic cleansing towards Turkish Cypriots!.and on Cyprus: Cyprus agrees to buy Israeli vessels costing €100m Alexy flemmings a year ago Miserable Kiproulla (Kiproulla-->little Cyprus) became superpower now :) It seems he tries to import his blog propaganda on Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 23:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Blog piece on Turkish invasion of Cyprus
|
---|
All knows that Turkey's intervention on Cyprus is COMPLETELY legal: 1. Article IV(2) Treaty of Guarantee: In the event of a breach of the provisions of the present treaty, Greece, Turkey and the United Kingdom undertake to consult together with respect to the representations or measures necessary to ensure observance of those provisions. IN SO FAR AS COMMON OR CONCERTED ACTION MAY NOT PROVE POSSIBLE, EACH OF THE THREE GUARANTEEING POWERS RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE ACTION. 2. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE): On 29 July 1974, PACE affirmed (via Resolution 573) that "the Turkish military INTERVENTION was the EXERCISE OF A RIGHT EMANATING FROM AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY and the fulfilment of a legal and moral obligation." 3. On 21 March 1979, GREECE's ATHENS COURT OF APPEALS decided that "The Turkish military INTERVENTION in Cyprus, which was carried out IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZURICH AND LONDON ACCORDS, WAS LEGAL. Turkey, as one of the Guarantor Powers, HAD THE RIGHT lo fulfill her obligations. The real culprits . . . are the Greek officers who engineered and staged a coup and prepared the conditions for this intervention" 4. There is no United Nations that calls Turkey's action on Cyprus as INVASION. All UN resolutions till now mentions it as INTERVENTION. 5. Though UN Security Council declared "TRNC's Declaration of Independence was illegal"; However, in 2010, Permanent Court of Justice of UN (that is supeior to UN SC) decided that "In international law, there is NOTHING for prohibiting Declarations of Independences", and decided in favor of Kosovo. Now, Kosovo is recognized by 106 UN countries. |
The proof of info in Disqus
|
---|
info: "United Nations Reports the other way around! There are proofs of the fact that Greek Cypriots are applying brutal ethnic cleansing towards Turkish Cypriots!" |
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below:
Britannica: In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? Are
|
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts even beginners know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian. As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know):
|
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
|
there is indeed a history of edit-warring, like over this little diff here
It was a deliberate attempt to mislead other editors, particularly the next admin to review...
...your repeated "unblock requests"
*@ Alexyflemmin: You, talking about being respectful to other users? Remember your message on my talkpage?:
Armenians said billions of times "genocide" since 1915 just as Greek Cypriots say billions of times "invasion" since 1974andI said One can bury his head in the sand like an ostrich till the hunter (truth) faces him.. Please, transmit my this message to GC fanatics (perhaps you may know some of them) along with USA Federal Court decision so that they can take their heads out of sands.And this is just one of your many personal attacks.
United States Federal Court Decision
Armenians said billions of times "genocide" since 1915 just as Greek Cypriots say billions of times "invasion" since 1974.
European Court of Human Rights (2013): "1915 events cannot be qualified as genocide".
On 13 October 2014, United States Federal Court ruled that "..Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots....Although the United States does not recognize it as a state, the TRNC purportedly operates as a democratic republic with a president, prime minister, legislature and judiciary... TRNC is not vulnerable to a lawsuit in Washington". courthousenews (Source:Courthouse News Service)I said One can bury his head in the sand like an ostrich till the hunter (truth) faces him.. Please, transmit my this message to GC fanatics (perhaps you may know some of them) along with USA Federal Court decision so that they can take their heads out of sands.
A majority of Greek Cypriots fled from the advancing Turkish army during the 2nd invasion.
Those who stayed behind in villages were put in camps and mistreated
some Greek Cypriots were expelled in retaliation for the mistreatment of Turkish Cypriots in the south
After the signing of the Population Exchange Agreement, they were formally allowed to leave so that they'd be reunited with their families on the other side
By 1981, only 1,000 Greek Cypriots remained in the north.
the agreement came long after the landscape had been shaped
the displacement of Greek Cypriots was a direct consequence of this agreement, which is nothing short of a historical rubbish
"... all over NC-related articles a text saying that GCs left the north voluntarily after the exchange agreement...":
the agreement came first, then the movement of people:"
"...agreement on "First,...". That is a first!":
Alexyflemming ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Unless you agree to stop your incessant arguing about Cyprus, I see not reason to unblock. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In Wikipedia, you, Dr.K., do not have any right to delete the replies of other Wikipedians to each other! If you continue to delete my replies to other Wiki users, I will report the case to the Arbitration Committee.to which I replied in my edit summary:
(Reverted 1 edit by Alexyflemming (talk): Don't be silly. I restored it soon after: Special:Diff/596946493.meaning that I had already restored his comment, which he did not bother to verify before coming to my talkpage with that attacking edit-summary. He grossly overreacted by leaving that attacking edit-summary and message on my talk and under the circumstances, I consider my remark to him to have been mild and justified. These misrepresentations are the trademark of this account. Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 21:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 14:49, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
I have removed your latest posts on this page and revoked your access to editing it. No page on Wikipedia is to be used for abuse. If you wish to request unblock, please go to the page WP:UTRS and follow instructions there. Bishonen | talk 20:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC).
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 01:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Denizli, Cyprus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Skamecrazy123 (
talk) 00:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 20:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Archieves | |
---|---|
As an expert on
Northern Cyprus and Eastern Mediterranean, I have edits in all of the following Wikipedia pages since 2010:
Northern Cyprus,
Talk:Northern Cyprus,
Turkey
Politics:
Foreign relations of Northern Cyprus,
Cyprus dispute,
Cypriot intercommunal violence,
United Nations Security Council Resolution 541,
2014 Cyprus Joint Declaration,
Human rights in Northern Cyprus,
Exclusive economic zone,
Mediterranean Oil Dispute,
Military of Northern Cyprus,
List of Republics
Demography:
Population transfer,
Population exchange between Greek and Turkish Cypriots,
Cypriot refugees,
Template:PopulationChartUnder1m,
List of countries by population,
List of sovereign states and dependent territories by population density,
Locations:
Mediterranean Sea,
Template:Municipalities of Northern Cyprus,
Kyrenia,
Güzelyurt District,
Morphou,
Famagusta,
Trikomo, Cyprus,
Ayios Andronikos, Cyprus,
Ayios Seryios, Cyprus,
Lefka,
Karpass Peninsula,
Bellapais
Transportation:
Ercan International Airport,
Nicosia International Airport
Education:
Education in Northern Cyprus,
Middle East Technical University Northern Cyprus Campus,
Cyprus International University,
University of Kyrenia
Sports:
Sport in Northern Cyprus,
World Pool-Billiard Association,
European Pocket Billiard Federation,
European Cyclists' Federation,
Paragliding,
Professional Football Leagues
Geography:
List of countries by easternmost point,
Pentadaktylos,
List of countries by highest point,
List of islands of Northern Cyprus,
List of islands#Europe
Culture:
List of top international rankings by country,
Bayrak (TV Channel of Northern Cyprus)
Religion:
Religions by country,
Religion in Europe,
Religion in Northern Cyprus
Tourism:
Tourism in Northern Cyprus
Others:
North Cyprus Red Crescent Society,
Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 November 26 (Is Northern Cyprus a Eurasian country?),
Cittaslow
Files: Long Beach Trikomo.jpg
United States Federal Court: "..Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots....Although the United States does not recognize it as a state, the TRNC purportedly operates as a democratic republic with a president, prime minister, legislature and judiciary...TRNC is not vulnerable to a lawsuit in Washington". Source. Alexyflemming ( talk) 14:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.
|
---|
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
|
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Diannaa (
talk) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Your long-term disruptive approach to editing on the topic of Cyprus is the reason for your block. Wikipedia is not the place to push a particular point of view on a subject. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive. Recent examples of edit warring: History of Northern Cyprus, Modern history of Cyprus, Northern Cyprus. -- Diannaa ( talk) 19:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Alexyflemming ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
A. Diannaa, yes,
it is "Cyprus", not "Cypress"...
B. We need to present a balanced neutral view, especially in volatile topic areas:
I defended that neutral point in various places and offered the usage of "neutral phrasing used by United Nations to describe the things in Cyprus dispute":
C. Your incredibly long talk page posts do not help generate collegial discussion, but rather are disruptive and counterproductive:
So, let you block every Wiki user that tries to explain things as much as clear? Lengthness of posts cannot be a blocking reason alone.
D. Edit warring your preferred version of articles is also disruptive:
I am not the 3RR violator. See the timeline of edits last time carefully to solve who violated 3RR for example:
15.10.2014:07.43:
I added Arbitration Committee's decision "The Arbitration Committee, in their infinite wisdom, determined that Cyprus does not fall under WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanction" to Talk page of Northern Cyprus (to let Wiki users edit via keeping this in mind)
15.10.2014:07.48:
Dr.K. immediately removed resulting decision of Arbitration Committee from Talk page of Northern Cyprus.
........
15.10.2014:07.47:
Dr.Κ. also reverted my edit on Northern Cyprus in the pretext that "
edit-war against consensus. (The reality is just the opposite. See below:) ".
But,
Dr.Κ. distorted again: He presented as if there is a consensus on removing the relevant material!
14.10.2014; 20.16: (my first edit) after
my first edit
14.10.2014:20.30: an
unkown IP31 reverted my edit vandalistically on the pretext that "This is about a case a US court did not, actually hear.".
14.10.2014:21.42:
Wikipedian Alexikoua reacted the unknown IP31's vandalism. (edit summary of
Alexikoua: "rv essential part removal").
Alexikoua is a Hellen, but neutral like me.
15.10.2014:00.38: Wikipedian
MelbourneStar
reacted to the unknown IP85's vandalism and protected the edit.
15.10.2014:05.23: Arbitration Committee rejected
Dr.K.:
Not actionable because this topic area is not covered by discretionary sanctions.
|
---|
This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
|
15.10.2014:07.45:
I replace the edit whose protection is the consensus of the known Wiki users (Alexikoua,MelbourneStar).
15.10.2014:07.47:
Dr.K. reverted with edit summary "edit-war against consensus"
E. There is a very clear Distortion of History of one of the related parties:
a.
(09.02.2014) "hiding the name of the principal initiator of that war";
Dr.Κ.: "The term "1974 Cyprus War" is misleading because it hides the name of the principal initiator of that war, which is Turkey"
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below:
Britannica: In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? Are
|
b.
(03.03.2014) island nation of Cyprus;
Dr.Κ.: "Historically, the island and the island nation of Cyprus have been considered to be the same."
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts even beginners know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian. As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know):
|
c.
(03.11.2014) "forcible eviction".
Dr.Κ.: ""Northern Cyprus" ....is the result of forcible population evictions".
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
|
F. Since this "Distortion of History" is revealed very clearly, that related party used every insulting word towards me:
Dr.K. said
"Silly" to me.
Neo ^ said
"Paid Supporter" to me.
Despite all these insulting words, I protected my common sense, and did not respond them in the way they are accustomed towards me.
Alexyflemming (
talk) 20:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
None of the volunteer administators are likely to try to follow this huge pile of links and comments. Feel free to make another unblock request, preferably adhering to our guide to appealing blocks. 21:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpgordon ( talk • contribs)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Alexy flemmings Carl B. 7 days ago United Nations Reports the other way around! There are proofs of the fact that Greek Cypriots are applying brutal ethnic cleansing towards Turkish Cypriots!.and on Cyprus: Cyprus agrees to buy Israeli vessels costing €100m Alexy flemmings a year ago Miserable Kiproulla (Kiproulla-->little Cyprus) became superpower now :) It seems he tries to import his blog propaganda on Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 23:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Blog piece on Turkish invasion of Cyprus
|
---|
All knows that Turkey's intervention on Cyprus is COMPLETELY legal: 1. Article IV(2) Treaty of Guarantee: In the event of a breach of the provisions of the present treaty, Greece, Turkey and the United Kingdom undertake to consult together with respect to the representations or measures necessary to ensure observance of those provisions. IN SO FAR AS COMMON OR CONCERTED ACTION MAY NOT PROVE POSSIBLE, EACH OF THE THREE GUARANTEEING POWERS RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE ACTION. 2. The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE): On 29 July 1974, PACE affirmed (via Resolution 573) that "the Turkish military INTERVENTION was the EXERCISE OF A RIGHT EMANATING FROM AN INTERNATIONAL TREATY and the fulfilment of a legal and moral obligation." 3. On 21 March 1979, GREECE's ATHENS COURT OF APPEALS decided that "The Turkish military INTERVENTION in Cyprus, which was carried out IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZURICH AND LONDON ACCORDS, WAS LEGAL. Turkey, as one of the Guarantor Powers, HAD THE RIGHT lo fulfill her obligations. The real culprits . . . are the Greek officers who engineered and staged a coup and prepared the conditions for this intervention" 4. There is no United Nations that calls Turkey's action on Cyprus as INVASION. All UN resolutions till now mentions it as INTERVENTION. 5. Though UN Security Council declared "TRNC's Declaration of Independence was illegal"; However, in 2010, Permanent Court of Justice of UN (that is supeior to UN SC) decided that "In international law, there is NOTHING for prohibiting Declarations of Independences", and decided in favor of Kosovo. Now, Kosovo is recognized by 106 UN countries. |
The proof of info in Disqus
|
---|
info: "United Nations Reports the other way around! There are proofs of the fact that Greek Cypriots are applying brutal ethnic cleansing towards Turkish Cypriots!" |
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
Look at what you wrote a couple of lines below:
Britannica: In July 1974 the Greek Cypriot National Guard, whose officers were mainland Greeks, atempted a coup, planned by the ruling military junta in Athens, to achieve enosis.. Hence, you disprove yourself your "hiding principal initiator" arguement. Notice that, almost whatever is handled in Cyprus dispute, there is some degree of bias just as your new "principal initiator" arguement. It should be Wikipedia's neutrality aim to be free from this conflict of interests. Also, 15.07.1974, Coup and declaration of "Hellenic Republic of Cyprus", 19.07.1974, Makarios' speech at UN SG: "Cyprus invaded by Greece", 20.07.1974, Turkey's meddling. Are 15.07.1974 and 19.07.1974 not preceding 20.07.1974? Are
|
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
When one mentions a certain people as a nation, there appears at least one dominant character (religion, ethnicity, language, culture, etc.) in that people. What is the religion, ethnicity, language, culture of this "the" island "nation" pre-1571 and post 1571? Forget experts even beginners know that there is no "the" "nation" in Cyprus island. Pre-1571 it was "CatholicChristian/OrthodoxChristian", "Frankish&Italian/GreekCypriot", "Latin/Greek", "Latin/Helen"; post-1571 it was "Islam/OrthodoxChristian", "Turk/Greek", "Turkish/Greek", "Turk/Helen". There occurred lots of conflicts, struggles and wars for the last millennium within the people of Cyprus island since the people of Cyprus island is not a "nation". This "the" island "nation" injection of bias/pre-conditioning is rather a merit of a politician, not a fair Wikipedian. As an expert, I want to redirect you to Makarios (1st President of Rep. of Cyprus, you know):
|
Alexyflemming: The disproofs:
|
---|
|
there is indeed a history of edit-warring, like over this little diff here
It was a deliberate attempt to mislead other editors, particularly the next admin to review...
...your repeated "unblock requests"
*@ Alexyflemmin: You, talking about being respectful to other users? Remember your message on my talkpage?:
Armenians said billions of times "genocide" since 1915 just as Greek Cypriots say billions of times "invasion" since 1974andI said One can bury his head in the sand like an ostrich till the hunter (truth) faces him.. Please, transmit my this message to GC fanatics (perhaps you may know some of them) along with USA Federal Court decision so that they can take their heads out of sands.And this is just one of your many personal attacks.
United States Federal Court Decision
Armenians said billions of times "genocide" since 1915 just as Greek Cypriots say billions of times "invasion" since 1974.
European Court of Human Rights (2013): "1915 events cannot be qualified as genocide".
On 13 October 2014, United States Federal Court ruled that "..Greek Cypriots cannot claim that the government in control of Northern Cyprus gave their homes to Turkish Cypriots....Although the United States does not recognize it as a state, the TRNC purportedly operates as a democratic republic with a president, prime minister, legislature and judiciary... TRNC is not vulnerable to a lawsuit in Washington". courthousenews (Source:Courthouse News Service)I said One can bury his head in the sand like an ostrich till the hunter (truth) faces him.. Please, transmit my this message to GC fanatics (perhaps you may know some of them) along with USA Federal Court decision so that they can take their heads out of sands.
A majority of Greek Cypriots fled from the advancing Turkish army during the 2nd invasion.
Those who stayed behind in villages were put in camps and mistreated
some Greek Cypriots were expelled in retaliation for the mistreatment of Turkish Cypriots in the south
After the signing of the Population Exchange Agreement, they were formally allowed to leave so that they'd be reunited with their families on the other side
By 1981, only 1,000 Greek Cypriots remained in the north.
the agreement came long after the landscape had been shaped
the displacement of Greek Cypriots was a direct consequence of this agreement, which is nothing short of a historical rubbish
"... all over NC-related articles a text saying that GCs left the north voluntarily after the exchange agreement...":
the agreement came first, then the movement of people:"
"...agreement on "First,...". That is a first!":
Alexyflemming ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Unless you agree to stop your incessant arguing about Cyprus, I see not reason to unblock. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In Wikipedia, you, Dr.K., do not have any right to delete the replies of other Wikipedians to each other! If you continue to delete my replies to other Wiki users, I will report the case to the Arbitration Committee.to which I replied in my edit summary:
(Reverted 1 edit by Alexyflemming (talk): Don't be silly. I restored it soon after: Special:Diff/596946493.meaning that I had already restored his comment, which he did not bother to verify before coming to my talkpage with that attacking edit-summary. He grossly overreacted by leaving that attacking edit-summary and message on my talk and under the circumstances, I consider my remark to him to have been mild and justified. These misrepresentations are the trademark of this account. Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 21:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 14:49, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
I have removed your latest posts on this page and revoked your access to editing it. No page on Wikipedia is to be used for abuse. If you wish to request unblock, please go to the page WP:UTRS and follow instructions there. Bishonen | talk 20:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC).
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 01:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Denizli, Cyprus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Skamecrazy123 (
talk) 00:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 20:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.