Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Health. Your edits appeared to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Gwernol
00:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to
Health. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
Gwernol
01:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
VABot II hasn't reverted any of your edits to the Health article. Stop posting that inappropriate message to User:VoABot II/Mistakes. All the reverts were by editors, not bots. Gwernol 01:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Syrthiss (
talk)
19:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Syrthiss ( talk) 19:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. I do not know where to insert {{
hangon}}
. I put it in the closest place I could find, but I am afraid it might be wrong. I would appreciate your support with this.
By the way, I posted the following in the article's Discussion
"This is an article that describes the largest academic department in Canada (and perhaps North America), that studies health policy, management and evaluation. I modeled this article on similar pages that exist for other university departments in other schools on Wikipedia, such as Harvard's School of Public Health [1].
I was asked to create this article because of increasing demand from colleagues, who are not associated with the University, who wondered why such an important organization did not have an entry.
Please note that, although I have an affiliation with the University of Toronto's Faculty of Medicine, this is not my primary place of appointment, so I do not feel that the conflict violates Wikipedia's policies, but I am glad to declare it. I used language similar to that of articles of other entities within the University of Toronto, such as the Joint Centre for Bioethics, with which I am not directly affiliated either. I would be glad to modify any of the contents that may not conform to expected standards at Wikipedia, but do request that the article be kept."
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Health. Your edits appeared to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Gwernol
00:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to
Health. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
Gwernol
01:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
VABot II hasn't reverted any of your edits to the Health article. Stop posting that inappropriate message to User:VoABot II/Mistakes. All the reverts were by editors, not bots. Gwernol 01:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Syrthiss (
talk)
19:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Syrthiss ( talk) 19:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. I do not know where to insert {{
hangon}}
. I put it in the closest place I could find, but I am afraid it might be wrong. I would appreciate your support with this.
By the way, I posted the following in the article's Discussion
"This is an article that describes the largest academic department in Canada (and perhaps North America), that studies health policy, management and evaluation. I modeled this article on similar pages that exist for other university departments in other schools on Wikipedia, such as Harvard's School of Public Health [1].
I was asked to create this article because of increasing demand from colleagues, who are not associated with the University, who wondered why such an important organization did not have an entry.
Please note that, although I have an affiliation with the University of Toronto's Faculty of Medicine, this is not my primary place of appointment, so I do not feel that the conflict violates Wikipedia's policies, but I am glad to declare it. I used language similar to that of articles of other entities within the University of Toronto, such as the Joint Centre for Bioethics, with which I am not directly affiliated either. I would be glad to modify any of the contents that may not conform to expected standards at Wikipedia, but do request that the article be kept."