(→October 2018: this finishes basic articles for all the C&C boats, except two that we don't have refs for)
Which two? Ken Heaton ( talk) 20:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ahunt ( talk) 20:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Ken Heaton ( talk) 22:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I did not know about the consensus until now. There was a separate article of Andreas Lubitz in the Simple English version, so I thought I would be okay to make one in the regular English version. I should have known earlier, and I apologize. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 15:51, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
You hate me (or you at least hate my editing but don't hate me altogether), don't you. Be honest. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 17:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
For the second time, the articles’s title was changed to Dominicana flight 603. I did it stating the improperly sounding title (I forgot to state how the info box was reading Dominicana flight 603) however, William was unhappy about it even though I showed him the time table you found (I think the flight number became 603 AFTER the accident, but the airline may have kept it), so I had to move it back, and I changed the info box title as well. We need more information on that flight number. Until then, the article title stays the same. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 13:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for catching my error on the CFB Chatham page. Great eye. Mech1949 ( talk) 17:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
The image of the aircraft involved (in its livery at the time it was bombed) isn’t displaying properly in the mobile app. The other one did though. I’m not the master at image editing, so how do I fix it? Or should I just revert to the older image? Tigerdude9 ( talk) 14:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
I apologize in advance for anything in my recent edits that looks unnecessary. Look in the edit history, where I explain more. Again I apologize in advance if I messed up (which I probably did), I really do. UPDATE: I undid the edits myself. I decided not to take the risk. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 17:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
I was going to fix this for you, but since you undid my edit instead of fixing it properly I'm not allowed to. Please be more careful when undoing legit edits!!!!!!!!
Like this, with a pipe character: (cn|reason=whatever the reason is) Ninjalectual ( talk) 22:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to be more open about my political views (who I like and hate), but at the same time, I'm nervous how others will react, and I even fear vandalism. I will tell you more information: I'm a democrat. But what would be the best thing to do? Tigerdude9 ( talk) 13:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Just FYI, this edit makes everything line up on chrome, IE and edge. (At least on my screen.) Sario528 ( talk) 14:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Good morning. I think that you should change the name of: Ixquick by StartPage. Since the name of: Ixquick is out of date. The updated name is: StartPage. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notewiki2000 ( talk • contribs) 05:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I pulled up the two articles that you link to to encourage people to have references on wikipedia and one of them 404ed, so I found you a new link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100425165517/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/judges-rap-wiki-evidence-in-immigration-cases/article1542565/ 🙅🙅🙅 ShAsHi SuShIlA mUrRaY😣😣😣 02:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ICON Aircraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page COO ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt! Can you please sign the petition to TASS and RIAN requesting them to release certain historic photos (many of them from WWII) for Wikimedia by adding your signature to the signature section? Also, please do spread the word to other Wikipedians. Thanks, - Samf4u ( talk) 14:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
HERO | |
Thank you for cleaning up the Skymax Wikipedia page. And yes, it *is* less spammy. I appreciate what you've done and your efforts. -V IBiteBack ( talk) 01:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hello again Ahunt, I'd like to ask you about the summary of Aeroflot Flight 821. The edits I usually make on summarized accidents are the initial cause such as software malfunction and leading up causes such as loss of control or spatial disorientation. Anyways the pilot (captain) of Aeroflot Flight 821 had a high blood alcohol level (intoxicated) when flying the aircraft and I was asking if you could mention about the pilot being intoxicated when flying the aircraft in the summary? OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 15:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ahunt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ahunt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions this week over at C&C yachts. I think that together we improved the article both significantly and substantially. It was a pleasure to work with you. Magnoffiq ( talk) 18:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've been looking for some free in-flight photos of the Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone for the article. The only one I've found so far is on Flickr, and it looks like it could be cropped without losing quality. It's labeled as "free to use", but I have no idea how to license it for Commons. Any thoughts? Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 19:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The summary box of the article is confusing; while the description says that the KAL 747 that sparked the false alarm has a tail number of HL7490, the details say that the number is HL7404 instead (check the summary box at the top of the article and you will know what I mean). I did not make any changes to the summary box because I cannot verify which tail number is actually correct. If you can verify which tail number is correct, please fix this confusion. Thanks. TransportFan2014 ( talk) 01:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
You removed my userbox, is it because the copyright? If so I can use another image Erfson ( talk) 00:47, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Pubgfile3.jpg Erfson ( talk) 01:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Someone came on the IRC help channel and said that they had paid you to work on the QAM article (which you edited about an hour ago).
"ahunt work for us ... we paid him to make the page ..."
Do you have any idea what he's talking about? DS ( talk) 18:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Ahunt, any idea what the round red thing on the tailboom is? I assume it's not the modern incarnation of Pinball! Just curious. - BilCat ( talk) 15:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
I should have picked thoseup, shouldn't i?-- Petebutt ( talk) 08:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt. Thanks for your work on such pages as C&C Yachts. I'm disappointed to remark that my submission of a page on Paul James Phelan has been contested and is now a candidate for speedy deletion. As a Canadian and a sailor, I wonder if you might help to preserve the Paul James Phelan page. Thanks for your consideration. Magnoffiq ( talk)
Thanks,
CrazyMinecart88 (
talk |
contribs)
23:53, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello Ahunt, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello Ahunt, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Thanks,
CrazyMinecart88 (
talk |
contribs)
22:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I’m obviously new to Wikipedia. I own the only example of this aircraft that’s still flying in the United States. I’ve attempted to update the wiki to improve accuracy. Please let me know what references I need to cite for the edits to be valid? I attempted to replace the RV-3 with the DR -107 since the RV-3 is not a comaparable aircraft. I also uploaded the photo that was removed. Please let me know what need to be done to post it. I also posted the photo that you reverted back to.
Thanks,
Marshall Owner Acro-1 N25BE Acroone ( talk) 20:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!) — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 16:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SwiftJet Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Ahunt, do you know of any photos of the Beartrap (hauldown device) that could be added to that article? Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 21:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I need your help. Jetstreamer is having a go at me for having cause undetermined in the summary when you on the other acident added that factor, please tell him about it.
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 16:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Ahunt, I appreciate the support. Jetsteamer states my summary edits are not good. For example, if it states a plane had an autopilot failure, id say Autopilot failure leading to a loss of control as did THIS accident.
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for the feedback regarding the removal of external links. I believe the external links I added to the Pearson Yacht sites were appropriate per the guidelines. The site that I linked provides much more comprehensive research information (directly from company documentation) about Pearson Yachts - and it seems to fit into this Wikipedia Guideline: "Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sailod ( talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
This is not about promotion, this is about documenting encyclopedia type information that has been gathered over many years that is not practical to put it all in the Wiki pages - it fits exactly into the Wikipedia guidelines as stated above. The references that you claim to be promotional are to a non-profit website that is the result of user input over several years with a very similar "model" to Wikipedia but it is not a wiki. As far as "every possible article" it is because a few of the specific Pearson models documented by Wikipedia also fit into the category of having encyclopedia type of information to reference. There are probably about 50 more models that could have pages associated with them so this is only the start of a long term effort. I would like to at least update the references for the Pearson Yachts page to share the information. Sailod ( talk) 14:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Agreed, thanks for the feedback Sailod ( talk) 16:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear Ahunt,
you have undone my revisions to the article "Siemens Fly-Eco Hybrid eFusion" twice even though I cited valid references for my corrections.
I see the following problems with the version as is:
- There is no "Siemens-FlyEco Magnus eFusion". The plane is called "Magnus eFusion". - Not clear whether this article is talking about the 'hybrid eFusion' or the 'eFusion'. Both use the same airframe (Magnus Fusion), but different propulsion systems. The article conflates both. - The hybrid never crashed. - The article attributes design of the plane to Siemens and FlyEco. This is wrong as the design is by Magnus. - Siemens designed the propulsion systems in both cases, there is no input from FlyEco for this beyond the provision of the combustion engine. - The picture shown is the fully electric eFusion, not the hybrid - The Manufacturer of the plane is not "Siemens and FlyEco" but "Magnus" - The fully electric shown had its first flight in April 2016 - "The prototype crashed" insinuates that there was only one eFusion. At the time of the accident, there were 4 eFusions, one of which was the hybrid. Correct would be "A prohttps://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ahunt&action=edit§ion=39totype" or "The pictured prototype" - "No cause of the accident has been determined" is incorrect. Pilot error has been established as the cause of the accident of the eFusion.
Would you kindly support that all this incorrect information about the Magnus eFusion gets removed from Wikipedia?
Thank you and best regards! 80.146.228.67 ( talk) 17:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. I think that may be the first time I've forgotten to sign in the past year or so. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 06:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flexjet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Field ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for liking my contribution on the F-35 article. My first like on wikipedia. It's encouraging and I hope to do more here on Wiki! BigRedDot ( talk) 23:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
A barnstar for you! BigRedDot ( talk) 23:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC) |
Appreciate you thanked for my contributions on page Diamond HK36 Super Dimona! Regards -- Olga Ernst ( talk) 21:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that you undid a revision I added and would like to understand more of why it was rejected. The edit seemed straightforward enough:
Thanks for uploading File:Elroy Air Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for [1]. Why is it starting to be annoying? Surely the commons links are only useful if they work? Thanks. Mike Peel ( talk) 20:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Air France Flight 4590#A few proposals for a possible FA push. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C&C 34/36, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transom ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Ahunt, I need to publish the Palmares of my Company, please can you give instructions how to do it properly? Sorry but it's must have for IAME, if you need, I can link every single result to the correspondant page of the Karting Championships.
Have a nice day, Gabriele — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.238.197.247 ( talk) 16:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Ahunt, I need to publish the Palmares of my Company, please can you give instructions how to do it properly? Sorry but it's must have for IAME, if you need, I can link every single result to the correspondant page of the Karting Championships.
Have a nice day, Gabriele — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.giudici ( talk • contribs) 17:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, I'm an external consultant of IAME and I think that the Palmares must be there (I've also added the reference like you suggested, at the page of the Karting Championship because it's part of the IAME's history like Ferrari, I don't think that they must link each year of victory). Also I want to let you know that everything about IAME is under copyright and under social responsability to divulgate right informations using the maximum respect regarding all the drivers that we made our history. We don't undestand which is the real problem because we don't say lies and we hope for the welness of Wikipedia to promote knowledge using responsibility. Let me understand, if I want to tell the History, truth facts, technical informations about IAME Engines, what I have to do avoiding the continuous blocking by you? Do you need that I follow my personal contacts so I can exchange with you the informations and you'll publish it respecting the rules that you're talking about? Let me give you an example, you're violating our trademark blocking the correct publishing of the actual registered trademark (eg. Logo), yesterday at 19:06, 28 January 2019 you Undid revision 880658705 polluting the truth. Today IAME Lawer Office, told me that exist a problem because via Wikipedia a consumer can be confused about the informations gived by Wikipedia (eg. Logo, website address). How can I proceed to allow the publishing of this informations? I've to contact the Wikimedia Lawers and ask them how to proceed for report as snapshop of the reality? Bye - G.giudici ( talk) 11:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC+1)
Uh oh. – The Grid ( talk) 16:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Is this not a reputable source?
No strong feeling either way. Seen a number of these added. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 02:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Time between overhauls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continental Motors ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I didn't make that edit you just reverted but I did see it there and as there was no reference I emailed Randy Borges the president of Waterline Systems to ask him about it. Can an email be used as a reference? The following was his reply:
Randy Borges <rhb@waterlinesystems.com> 19:58 (1 hour ago) to me
Ken, no idea who posted that? the following is correct. There was no purchase from USW. We have a licensing agreement for the name. We do have the C&C 30 tooling but our main objective is support of the brand and not building anything right now.
Fast Forward 2019 the C&C Yachts brand still lives on. “Squirrel Works” dba “Waterline Systems” the predecessor of USWatercraft obtained exclusive rights to the C&C Yachts name and existing tooling. Waterline Systems founder Randy Borges who grew up in Youngstown, NY right across the river from the C&C Yachts Niagara on the Lake facility has had a lifelong affinity with this great brand. Waterline Systems renowned for world class service and aftermarket support will do everything it can to support the many loyal C&C owners throughout the world. info@waterlinesystems.com 401-247-300
Best Regards,
Randy Borges
Waterline Systems
342 Compass Circle
North Kingstown, RI. 02852
PH: 401-247-3000
“Great Finishes Start at the Waterline”
From: Ken Heaton Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 6:43 PM To: rhb@waterlinesystems.com Subject: C&C 30 design and tooling is now supported by Waterline Systems
Hello Randy,
An anonymous editor added the following to the Wikipedia article about the C&C 30:
"The C&C 30 design and tooling is now supported by Waterline Systems, who purchased them from USWatercraft. Waterline Systems will be supporting the boats and owners going forward."
There is no reference provided to verify that this is true, so that information will likely be deleted from the article by other editors soon unless one of us can find a reference to show that this is in fact true.
Is this an accurate description of the situation, and is there a source online or otherwise we can add to the article to support this information?
Respectfully yours,
Ken Heaton Ken Heaton ( talk) 01:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Seair Seaplanes Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
are the references supposed to be about the films themselves, or about the planes in the films. If the latter is it fine to have info about the aircraft in the film but without a reference.
Also you need to check through a ;lot of the references on the page as they are currently going to dead links / websites. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by SJS114 ( talk • contribs) 22:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FireSeason01.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt. I am not affiliated in any way with ULPower or Sonex. That Sonex use ULPower as a standard engine is something no one anticipated since Sonex have their own engines, as well as the now defunct Jabiru engines. It's one of the oddest things, yet extremely welcome thing that has happened in the experimental/LSA industry for ages. Also, that tons of info is available, how is that non-important for an encyclopedia? SvingenB ( talk) 16:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
In the United States and in many other jurisdictions, if your aircraft squawks a transponder code such as 7500 or 7700 without a bona fide emergency it is considered a Class 'A' felony offense, although I would personally NEVER do it I was at a local airport when a pilot was taken into custody by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and charged on various felony counts. The pilot was convicted and sentenced to a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in a federal correctional facility and yes he did have his airmen's certificate (pilot's liceense) permanently revoke. YborCityJohn ( talk) 01:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I am surprised that is an actual rule here. It seems not very well enforced, though, since there are tons of military infoboxes with the flags of the various service branches showing on their equivalent pages; I came across more than enough to see it is quite commonly done. Well whatever. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ PartColumbia ( talk) 01:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Per
FlightGlobal, "MD Helicopters is developing a winged-variant of its rotorless, twin-engined MD902 Explorer for the US Army’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) programme."
Someone needs a better proofreader! Maybe I should apply. -
BilCat (
talk)
01:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Also "jet fan trust"
. They've been making minor mistakes for years, but this article is the worst one I can remember. -
BilCat (
talk)
01:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
The article was a bit hard to read, but does it sound like MDH is beefing up the Swift's NOTAR fan to provide a little forward thrust, assumingly out a rear-facing duct? Obviously the main rotor still has to provide most of the thrust, but the wing helps to offload the rotor some. This source seems to imply that too, as it mentions "new fans and thrusters". - BilCat ( talk) 03:23, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Couple of questions. Do you think 'aviastar' (eg http://www.aviastar.org/air/germany/horten_ho-7.php) can be classified as reliable? Also, I think the new Caudron C.360 would be better merged with existing Caudron C.362 - see Talk. What do you think? Cheers, TSRL ( talk) 16:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, see Special:Contributions/Mark_Jean. I've reported the user to ANI for COI and legal threats. I'm heading to bed, but hopefully the admins will have taken care of this by the time I return. Since you were "involved" with this user's initial edits, I'm letting you know what steps I've taken in case the issue isn't resolved by the time you resume editing and see what's happened. Thanks again. - BilCat ( talk) 08:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
(→October 2018: this finishes basic articles for all the C&C boats, except two that we don't have refs for)
Which two? Ken Heaton ( talk) 20:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ahunt ( talk) 20:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Ken Heaton ( talk) 22:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I did not know about the consensus until now. There was a separate article of Andreas Lubitz in the Simple English version, so I thought I would be okay to make one in the regular English version. I should have known earlier, and I apologize. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 15:51, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
You hate me (or you at least hate my editing but don't hate me altogether), don't you. Be honest. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 17:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
For the second time, the articles’s title was changed to Dominicana flight 603. I did it stating the improperly sounding title (I forgot to state how the info box was reading Dominicana flight 603) however, William was unhappy about it even though I showed him the time table you found (I think the flight number became 603 AFTER the accident, but the airline may have kept it), so I had to move it back, and I changed the info box title as well. We need more information on that flight number. Until then, the article title stays the same. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 13:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for catching my error on the CFB Chatham page. Great eye. Mech1949 ( talk) 17:53, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
The image of the aircraft involved (in its livery at the time it was bombed) isn’t displaying properly in the mobile app. The other one did though. I’m not the master at image editing, so how do I fix it? Or should I just revert to the older image? Tigerdude9 ( talk) 14:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
I apologize in advance for anything in my recent edits that looks unnecessary. Look in the edit history, where I explain more. Again I apologize in advance if I messed up (which I probably did), I really do. UPDATE: I undid the edits myself. I decided not to take the risk. Tigerdude9 ( talk) 17:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
I was going to fix this for you, but since you undid my edit instead of fixing it properly I'm not allowed to. Please be more careful when undoing legit edits!!!!!!!!
Like this, with a pipe character: (cn|reason=whatever the reason is) Ninjalectual ( talk) 22:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
I want to be more open about my political views (who I like and hate), but at the same time, I'm nervous how others will react, and I even fear vandalism. I will tell you more information: I'm a democrat. But what would be the best thing to do? Tigerdude9 ( talk) 13:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Just FYI, this edit makes everything line up on chrome, IE and edge. (At least on my screen.) Sario528 ( talk) 14:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Good morning. I think that you should change the name of: Ixquick by StartPage. Since the name of: Ixquick is out of date. The updated name is: StartPage. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notewiki2000 ( talk • contribs) 05:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I pulled up the two articles that you link to to encourage people to have references on wikipedia and one of them 404ed, so I found you a new link: https://web.archive.org/web/20100425165517/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/judges-rap-wiki-evidence-in-immigration-cases/article1542565/ 🙅🙅🙅 ShAsHi SuShIlA mUrRaY😣😣😣 02:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ICON Aircraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page COO ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt! Can you please sign the petition to TASS and RIAN requesting them to release certain historic photos (many of them from WWII) for Wikimedia by adding your signature to the signature section? Also, please do spread the word to other Wikipedians. Thanks, - Samf4u ( talk) 14:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
HERO | |
Thank you for cleaning up the Skymax Wikipedia page. And yes, it *is* less spammy. I appreciate what you've done and your efforts. -V IBiteBack ( talk) 01:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hello again Ahunt, I'd like to ask you about the summary of Aeroflot Flight 821. The edits I usually make on summarized accidents are the initial cause such as software malfunction and leading up causes such as loss of control or spatial disorientation. Anyways the pilot (captain) of Aeroflot Flight 821 had a high blood alcohol level (intoxicated) when flying the aircraft and I was asking if you could mention about the pilot being intoxicated when flying the aircraft in the summary? OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 15:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ahunt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ahunt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions this week over at C&C yachts. I think that together we improved the article both significantly and substantially. It was a pleasure to work with you. Magnoffiq ( talk) 18:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've been looking for some free in-flight photos of the Sikorsky CH-148 Cyclone for the article. The only one I've found so far is on Flickr, and it looks like it could be cropped without losing quality. It's labeled as "free to use", but I have no idea how to license it for Commons. Any thoughts? Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 19:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
The summary box of the article is confusing; while the description says that the KAL 747 that sparked the false alarm has a tail number of HL7490, the details say that the number is HL7404 instead (check the summary box at the top of the article and you will know what I mean). I did not make any changes to the summary box because I cannot verify which tail number is actually correct. If you can verify which tail number is correct, please fix this confusion. Thanks. TransportFan2014 ( talk) 01:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
You removed my userbox, is it because the copyright? If so I can use another image Erfson ( talk) 00:47, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Pubgfile3.jpg Erfson ( talk) 01:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Someone came on the IRC help channel and said that they had paid you to work on the QAM article (which you edited about an hour ago).
"ahunt work for us ... we paid him to make the page ..."
Do you have any idea what he's talking about? DS ( talk) 18:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Ahunt, any idea what the round red thing on the tailboom is? I assume it's not the modern incarnation of Pinball! Just curious. - BilCat ( talk) 15:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
I should have picked thoseup, shouldn't i?-- Petebutt ( talk) 08:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt. Thanks for your work on such pages as C&C Yachts. I'm disappointed to remark that my submission of a page on Paul James Phelan has been contested and is now a candidate for speedy deletion. As a Canadian and a sailor, I wonder if you might help to preserve the Paul James Phelan page. Thanks for your consideration. Magnoffiq ( talk)
Thanks,
CrazyMinecart88 (
talk |
contribs)
23:53, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello Ahunt, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello Ahunt, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Thanks,
CrazyMinecart88 (
talk |
contribs)
22:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I’m obviously new to Wikipedia. I own the only example of this aircraft that’s still flying in the United States. I’ve attempted to update the wiki to improve accuracy. Please let me know what references I need to cite for the edits to be valid? I attempted to replace the RV-3 with the DR -107 since the RV-3 is not a comaparable aircraft. I also uploaded the photo that was removed. Please let me know what need to be done to post it. I also posted the photo that you reverted back to.
Thanks,
Marshall Owner Acro-1 N25BE Acroone ( talk) 20:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!) — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 16:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SwiftJet Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Ahunt, do you know of any photos of the Beartrap (hauldown device) that could be added to that article? Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 21:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I need your help. Jetstreamer is having a go at me for having cause undetermined in the summary when you on the other acident added that factor, please tell him about it.
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 16:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Ahunt, I appreciate the support. Jetsteamer states my summary edits are not good. For example, if it states a plane had an autopilot failure, id say Autopilot failure leading to a loss of control as did THIS accident.
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for the feedback regarding the removal of external links. I believe the external links I added to the Pearson Yacht sites were appropriate per the guidelines. The site that I linked provides much more comprehensive research information (directly from company documentation) about Pearson Yachts - and it seems to fit into this Wikipedia Guideline: "Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sailod ( talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
This is not about promotion, this is about documenting encyclopedia type information that has been gathered over many years that is not practical to put it all in the Wiki pages - it fits exactly into the Wikipedia guidelines as stated above. The references that you claim to be promotional are to a non-profit website that is the result of user input over several years with a very similar "model" to Wikipedia but it is not a wiki. As far as "every possible article" it is because a few of the specific Pearson models documented by Wikipedia also fit into the category of having encyclopedia type of information to reference. There are probably about 50 more models that could have pages associated with them so this is only the start of a long term effort. I would like to at least update the references for the Pearson Yachts page to share the information. Sailod ( talk) 14:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Agreed, thanks for the feedback Sailod ( talk) 16:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear Ahunt,
you have undone my revisions to the article "Siemens Fly-Eco Hybrid eFusion" twice even though I cited valid references for my corrections.
I see the following problems with the version as is:
- There is no "Siemens-FlyEco Magnus eFusion". The plane is called "Magnus eFusion". - Not clear whether this article is talking about the 'hybrid eFusion' or the 'eFusion'. Both use the same airframe (Magnus Fusion), but different propulsion systems. The article conflates both. - The hybrid never crashed. - The article attributes design of the plane to Siemens and FlyEco. This is wrong as the design is by Magnus. - Siemens designed the propulsion systems in both cases, there is no input from FlyEco for this beyond the provision of the combustion engine. - The picture shown is the fully electric eFusion, not the hybrid - The Manufacturer of the plane is not "Siemens and FlyEco" but "Magnus" - The fully electric shown had its first flight in April 2016 - "The prototype crashed" insinuates that there was only one eFusion. At the time of the accident, there were 4 eFusions, one of which was the hybrid. Correct would be "A prohttps://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ahunt&action=edit§ion=39totype" or "The pictured prototype" - "No cause of the accident has been determined" is incorrect. Pilot error has been established as the cause of the accident of the eFusion.
Would you kindly support that all this incorrect information about the Magnus eFusion gets removed from Wikipedia?
Thank you and best regards! 80.146.228.67 ( talk) 17:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that. I think that may be the first time I've forgotten to sign in the past year or so. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 06:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flexjet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Field ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for liking my contribution on the F-35 article. My first like on wikipedia. It's encouraging and I hope to do more here on Wiki! BigRedDot ( talk) 23:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
A barnstar for you! BigRedDot ( talk) 23:18, 18 January 2019 (UTC) |
Appreciate you thanked for my contributions on page Diamond HK36 Super Dimona! Regards -- Olga Ernst ( talk) 21:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that you undid a revision I added and would like to understand more of why it was rejected. The edit seemed straightforward enough:
Thanks for uploading File:Elroy Air Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for [1]. Why is it starting to be annoying? Surely the commons links are only useful if they work? Thanks. Mike Peel ( talk) 20:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Air France Flight 4590#A few proposals for a possible FA push. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 20:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited C&C 34/36, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transom ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Ahunt, I need to publish the Palmares of my Company, please can you give instructions how to do it properly? Sorry but it's must have for IAME, if you need, I can link every single result to the correspondant page of the Karting Championships.
Have a nice day, Gabriele — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.238.197.247 ( talk) 16:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Ahunt, I need to publish the Palmares of my Company, please can you give instructions how to do it properly? Sorry but it's must have for IAME, if you need, I can link every single result to the correspondant page of the Karting Championships.
Have a nice day, Gabriele — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.giudici ( talk • contribs) 17:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, I'm an external consultant of IAME and I think that the Palmares must be there (I've also added the reference like you suggested, at the page of the Karting Championship because it's part of the IAME's history like Ferrari, I don't think that they must link each year of victory). Also I want to let you know that everything about IAME is under copyright and under social responsability to divulgate right informations using the maximum respect regarding all the drivers that we made our history. We don't undestand which is the real problem because we don't say lies and we hope for the welness of Wikipedia to promote knowledge using responsibility. Let me understand, if I want to tell the History, truth facts, technical informations about IAME Engines, what I have to do avoiding the continuous blocking by you? Do you need that I follow my personal contacts so I can exchange with you the informations and you'll publish it respecting the rules that you're talking about? Let me give you an example, you're violating our trademark blocking the correct publishing of the actual registered trademark (eg. Logo), yesterday at 19:06, 28 January 2019 you Undid revision 880658705 polluting the truth. Today IAME Lawer Office, told me that exist a problem because via Wikipedia a consumer can be confused about the informations gived by Wikipedia (eg. Logo, website address). How can I proceed to allow the publishing of this informations? I've to contact the Wikimedia Lawers and ask them how to proceed for report as snapshop of the reality? Bye - G.giudici ( talk) 11:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC+1)
Uh oh. – The Grid ( talk) 16:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Is this not a reputable source?
No strong feeling either way. Seen a number of these added. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 02:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Time between overhauls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continental Motors ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I didn't make that edit you just reverted but I did see it there and as there was no reference I emailed Randy Borges the president of Waterline Systems to ask him about it. Can an email be used as a reference? The following was his reply:
Randy Borges <rhb@waterlinesystems.com> 19:58 (1 hour ago) to me
Ken, no idea who posted that? the following is correct. There was no purchase from USW. We have a licensing agreement for the name. We do have the C&C 30 tooling but our main objective is support of the brand and not building anything right now.
Fast Forward 2019 the C&C Yachts brand still lives on. “Squirrel Works” dba “Waterline Systems” the predecessor of USWatercraft obtained exclusive rights to the C&C Yachts name and existing tooling. Waterline Systems founder Randy Borges who grew up in Youngstown, NY right across the river from the C&C Yachts Niagara on the Lake facility has had a lifelong affinity with this great brand. Waterline Systems renowned for world class service and aftermarket support will do everything it can to support the many loyal C&C owners throughout the world. info@waterlinesystems.com 401-247-300
Best Regards,
Randy Borges
Waterline Systems
342 Compass Circle
North Kingstown, RI. 02852
PH: 401-247-3000
“Great Finishes Start at the Waterline”
From: Ken Heaton Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 6:43 PM To: rhb@waterlinesystems.com Subject: C&C 30 design and tooling is now supported by Waterline Systems
Hello Randy,
An anonymous editor added the following to the Wikipedia article about the C&C 30:
"The C&C 30 design and tooling is now supported by Waterline Systems, who purchased them from USWatercraft. Waterline Systems will be supporting the boats and owners going forward."
There is no reference provided to verify that this is true, so that information will likely be deleted from the article by other editors soon unless one of us can find a reference to show that this is in fact true.
Is this an accurate description of the situation, and is there a source online or otherwise we can add to the article to support this information?
Respectfully yours,
Ken Heaton Ken Heaton ( talk) 01:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Seair Seaplanes Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
are the references supposed to be about the films themselves, or about the planes in the films. If the latter is it fine to have info about the aircraft in the film but without a reference.
Also you need to check through a ;lot of the references on the page as they are currently going to dead links / websites. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by SJS114 ( talk • contribs) 22:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FireSeason01.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello Ahunt. I am not affiliated in any way with ULPower or Sonex. That Sonex use ULPower as a standard engine is something no one anticipated since Sonex have their own engines, as well as the now defunct Jabiru engines. It's one of the oddest things, yet extremely welcome thing that has happened in the experimental/LSA industry for ages. Also, that tons of info is available, how is that non-important for an encyclopedia? SvingenB ( talk) 16:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
In the United States and in many other jurisdictions, if your aircraft squawks a transponder code such as 7500 or 7700 without a bona fide emergency it is considered a Class 'A' felony offense, although I would personally NEVER do it I was at a local airport when a pilot was taken into custody by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and charged on various felony counts. The pilot was convicted and sentenced to a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 20 years in a federal correctional facility and yes he did have his airmen's certificate (pilot's liceense) permanently revoke. YborCityJohn ( talk) 01:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I am surprised that is an actual rule here. It seems not very well enforced, though, since there are tons of military infoboxes with the flags of the various service branches showing on their equivalent pages; I came across more than enough to see it is quite commonly done. Well whatever. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ PartColumbia ( talk) 01:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Per
FlightGlobal, "MD Helicopters is developing a winged-variant of its rotorless, twin-engined MD902 Explorer for the US Army’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) programme."
Someone needs a better proofreader! Maybe I should apply. -
BilCat (
talk)
01:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Also "jet fan trust"
. They've been making minor mistakes for years, but this article is the worst one I can remember. -
BilCat (
talk)
01:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
The article was a bit hard to read, but does it sound like MDH is beefing up the Swift's NOTAR fan to provide a little forward thrust, assumingly out a rear-facing duct? Obviously the main rotor still has to provide most of the thrust, but the wing helps to offload the rotor some. This source seems to imply that too, as it mentions "new fans and thrusters". - BilCat ( talk) 03:23, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Couple of questions. Do you think 'aviastar' (eg http://www.aviastar.org/air/germany/horten_ho-7.php) can be classified as reliable? Also, I think the new Caudron C.360 would be better merged with existing Caudron C.362 - see Talk. What do you think? Cheers, TSRL ( talk) 16:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahunt, see Special:Contributions/Mark_Jean. I've reported the user to ANI for COI and legal threats. I'm heading to bed, but hopefully the admins will have taken care of this by the time I return. Since you were "involved" with this user's initial edits, I'm letting you know what steps I've taken in case the issue isn't resolved by the time you resume editing and see what's happened. Thanks again. - BilCat ( talk) 08:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)