A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trevor James Constable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor James Constable until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie ( talk) 16:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Taxa with documented paleopathologies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ( talk) 20:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Taxa with documented soft tissue fossils, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ( talk) 14:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Subfields and areas of study related to evolutionary biology has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
The article Tilgate Formation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
The ages in Dinosauria are very general, and a lot of more detailed start work has been done on major formations since the 2nd edition was published. In general though, things like Aptian-Albian are usually used to mean somewhere around the boundary or straddling the boundary, not ranging from early Aptian to late Albian. It can also mean the youngest sediments are Albian and oldest are Aptian, though you wouldn't be able to tell from this when in each stage they are, nor should just Aptian be taken to mean it spanned the entire stage. Listing stage alone is good to get general bearings but is next to useless for comparing formations. Dinoguy2 ( talk) 16:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
You've been going great guns on creating Mesozoic-formation stubs (I came here from Khilok Formation), but I have a request. Please put in some information about where each formation is located: a region, a state, a country, anything! It will help de-orphanize some of the articles, and it would help greatly in categorizing. Thanks! - Gorthian ( talk) 04:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Also, if you could tag the talk page with the WP:GEOLOGY banner, that would help out, too. - Gorthian ( talk) 04:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, me again. You recently created Luohangdong Formation; but I think it's a misspelling of Luohandong Formation, which you created back in 2009. If I'm right, maybe you could just ask for a speedy delete of the mistaken one. If they really are separate formations, maybe a hatnote or two to disambiguate them? Cheers! - Gorthian ( talk) 05:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Well, now I found Qiqu Formation and Qigu Formation, and I have the same questions. I don't have the background, or the references, to tease these out. - Gorthian ( talk) 05:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in West Virginia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Indiana may have broken the
syntax by modifying 12 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in North Carolina may have broken the
syntax by modifying 12 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Virginia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 34 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Delaware may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in South Carolina may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in New York may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Indiana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richmond and Waynesville ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Did you know there is more than one place in the world called Georgia? Well, now you do. The next time you decide to create 30 or more articles containing identical text blocks, you might want to check first to make sure that the links in them are going to the correct article. Thanks! R'n'B ( call me Russ) 21:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Try not using broken brackets and fix them when bracketbot tells you about them. You currently have 32 broken brackets in your article. I really don't want to waste my time fixing your problems. Bgwhite ( talk) 21:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Abyssal! I see you have been creating lots of article stubs using {{
pagename}}
, which puts your articles in the maintenance
Category:Pages which use a template in place of a magic word. Could you replace each instance of {{pagename}}
with {{subst:PAGENAME}}
, so that the wiki will automatically convert the template to the actual page name? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
16:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
{{subst:pagename}}
(lowercase), I got the mess, whereas {{subst:PAGENAME}}
(uppercase) should be fine. Could you please confirm which you used? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
22:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Abyssal. There is an existing article on Platteville Limestone. You may wish to add the content of one article to the other, and convert the one to a redirect. I think that "Platteville Formation" is the more common name, but could be mistaken. Regards, Kablammo ( talk) 20:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Could you check List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Pennsylvania. I think the script went haywire and there are alot of broken brackets. Bgwhite ( talk) 22:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in El Salvador is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in El Salvador until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickGibson3900 ( Talk - Cont.) 11:33, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
You have created a lot of articles with nothing in them. Are they going to be fixed or should they all be deleted? NickGibson3900 ( Talk - Cont.) 11:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello. A redirect you created, Campeto Formation, is listed at Special:DoubleRedirects because it is a redirect to itself. I'm sure this was not your intention, and normally I would try to resolve redirect loops myself. However, in this case I have been unable to identify the correct target for the redirect. Please would you take a look? Thanks. – Wdchk ( talk) 02:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I was about to Prod the article until I saw your name. You need some text.. big map with nothing else tell me nothing. But the big problem, screen readers (aka blind) have a hard problem "seeing" anything via the map. Might want to change it to a list. Bgwhite ( talk) 05:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland Group. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
In recognition of your recent and continuing work on stratigraphic units. RomanSpa ( talk) 06:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trevor James Constable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor James Constable until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie ( talk) 16:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Taxa with documented paleopathologies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ( talk) 20:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Taxa with documented soft tissue fossils, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ( talk) 14:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Subfields and areas of study related to evolutionary biology has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
The article Tilgate Formation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
The ages in Dinosauria are very general, and a lot of more detailed start work has been done on major formations since the 2nd edition was published. In general though, things like Aptian-Albian are usually used to mean somewhere around the boundary or straddling the boundary, not ranging from early Aptian to late Albian. It can also mean the youngest sediments are Albian and oldest are Aptian, though you wouldn't be able to tell from this when in each stage they are, nor should just Aptian be taken to mean it spanned the entire stage. Listing stage alone is good to get general bearings but is next to useless for comparing formations. Dinoguy2 ( talk) 16:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
You've been going great guns on creating Mesozoic-formation stubs (I came here from Khilok Formation), but I have a request. Please put in some information about where each formation is located: a region, a state, a country, anything! It will help de-orphanize some of the articles, and it would help greatly in categorizing. Thanks! - Gorthian ( talk) 04:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Also, if you could tag the talk page with the WP:GEOLOGY banner, that would help out, too. - Gorthian ( talk) 04:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, me again. You recently created Luohangdong Formation; but I think it's a misspelling of Luohandong Formation, which you created back in 2009. If I'm right, maybe you could just ask for a speedy delete of the mistaken one. If they really are separate formations, maybe a hatnote or two to disambiguate them? Cheers! - Gorthian ( talk) 05:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Well, now I found Qiqu Formation and Qigu Formation, and I have the same questions. I don't have the background, or the references, to tease these out. - Gorthian ( talk) 05:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in West Virginia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 05:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Indiana may have broken the
syntax by modifying 12 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in North Carolina may have broken the
syntax by modifying 12 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Virginia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 34 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Delaware may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in South Carolina may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in New York may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Indiana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richmond and Waynesville ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Did you know there is more than one place in the world called Georgia? Well, now you do. The next time you decide to create 30 or more articles containing identical text blocks, you might want to check first to make sure that the links in them are going to the correct article. Thanks! R'n'B ( call me Russ) 21:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Try not using broken brackets and fix them when bracketbot tells you about them. You currently have 32 broken brackets in your article. I really don't want to waste my time fixing your problems. Bgwhite ( talk) 21:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Abyssal! I see you have been creating lots of article stubs using {{
pagename}}
, which puts your articles in the maintenance
Category:Pages which use a template in place of a magic word. Could you replace each instance of {{pagename}}
with {{subst:PAGENAME}}
, so that the wiki will automatically convert the template to the actual page name? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
16:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
{{subst:pagename}}
(lowercase), I got the mess, whereas {{subst:PAGENAME}}
(uppercase) should be fine. Could you please confirm which you used? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
22:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Abyssal. There is an existing article on Platteville Limestone. You may wish to add the content of one article to the other, and convert the one to a redirect. I think that "Platteville Formation" is the more common name, but could be mistaken. Regards, Kablammo ( talk) 20:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Could you check List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Pennsylvania. I think the script went haywire and there are alot of broken brackets. Bgwhite ( talk) 22:52, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in El Salvador is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in El Salvador until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickGibson3900 ( Talk - Cont.) 11:33, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
You have created a lot of articles with nothing in them. Are they going to be fixed or should they all be deleted? NickGibson3900 ( Talk - Cont.) 11:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello. A redirect you created, Campeto Formation, is listed at Special:DoubleRedirects because it is a redirect to itself. I'm sure this was not your intention, and normally I would try to resolve redirect loops myself. However, in this case I have been unable to identify the correct target for the redirect. Please would you take a look? Thanks. – Wdchk ( talk) 02:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I was about to Prod the article until I saw your name. You need some text.. big map with nothing else tell me nothing. But the big problem, screen readers (aka blind) have a hard problem "seeing" anything via the map. Might want to change it to a list. Bgwhite ( talk) 05:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland Group. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
In recognition of your recent and continuing work on stratigraphic units. RomanSpa ( talk) 06:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC) |