Hello, Abdulquadir14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jalpaiguri have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. - Arjayay ( talk) 11:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jalpaiguri. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Hastiness (
talk)
17:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Jalpaiguri, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Jalpaiguri. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jalpaiguri. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Allahabad, you may be
blocked from editing. Warning for making a cut-and-paste move of
Allahabad to
Prayagraj. - Tom |
Thomas.W
talk
16:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --
ferret (
talk)
18:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)I noticed some of your edits, particularly to the Fakiragram page. I think you are having problems in adjusting to addition of reliable references. If you want to continue in Wikipedia you will have to add reliable sources for verification by other editors. Everything added to Wikipedia must be verifiable. Another point I want to add is: Why don't you add photographs. Fakiragram is a beautiful place. You seem to be living in that area. Can I expect one/two photographs from you? Cheers. - Chandan Guha ( talk) 15:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Siliguri, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
Dl2000 (
talk)
19:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Siliguri, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Dl2000 (
talk)
19:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Jalpaiguri, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Dl2000 (
talk)
20:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Jalpaiguri, you may be
blocked from editing.
Dl2000 (
talk)
20:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
22:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
15:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Kolkata, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Tamravidhir (
talk)
09:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors as you did here. See Wikipedia:Civility for guidance. DrKay ( talk) 16:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Kolkata. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Tamravidhir (
talk)
09:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- A discussion involving you has been started at Talk:Kolkata#Edits_by_User:Abdulquadir14. You are welcomed to engage in the discussion. -- Tamravidhir ( talk) 09:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Abdulquadir. Although I noticed that you have received various warnings, those are short standard templates, so I will try to explain why your edits were reverted. The encyclopedia's text should be summaries of reliable sources ( WP:RS) and cannot contain our own original research or synthesis ( WP:OR, WP:SYNTH). You were also warned for making personal attacks; discussions on Wikipedia should indeed be about the content and sources rather than about the editors ( WP:TPO and WP:REVTALK for more information). Exceptions are at personal user pages (like this one) and at administrator noticeboards when it is necessary to report a user account for disruptive editing ( WP:ANI). Editing is a privilege, not a right and it is important to work towards WP:CONSENSUS and avoid "edit warring" ( WP:3RR). I suggest to participate at the discussion at the bottom of the Talk:Kolkata talk page, that another editor opened for you. I hope this helps a bit. Please be patient (there is no deadline for article improvements), and happy editing, — Paleo Neonate – 17:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Abdulquadir14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jalpaiguri have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. - Arjayay ( talk) 11:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jalpaiguri. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Hastiness (
talk)
17:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Jalpaiguri, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Jalpaiguri. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jalpaiguri. -
Arjayay (
talk)
11:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Allahabad, you may be
blocked from editing. Warning for making a cut-and-paste move of
Allahabad to
Prayagraj. - Tom |
Thomas.W
talk
16:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --
ferret (
talk)
18:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)I noticed some of your edits, particularly to the Fakiragram page. I think you are having problems in adjusting to addition of reliable references. If you want to continue in Wikipedia you will have to add reliable sources for verification by other editors. Everything added to Wikipedia must be verifiable. Another point I want to add is: Why don't you add photographs. Fakiragram is a beautiful place. You seem to be living in that area. Can I expect one/two photographs from you? Cheers. - Chandan Guha ( talk) 15:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Siliguri, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
Dl2000 (
talk)
19:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Siliguri, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Dl2000 (
talk)
19:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Jalpaiguri, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Dl2000 (
talk)
20:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Jalpaiguri, you may be
blocked from editing.
Dl2000 (
talk)
20:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
22:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
15:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Kolkata, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Tamravidhir (
talk)
09:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors as you did here. See Wikipedia:Civility for guidance. DrKay ( talk) 16:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Kolkata. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Tamravidhir (
talk)
09:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- A discussion involving you has been started at Talk:Kolkata#Edits_by_User:Abdulquadir14. You are welcomed to engage in the discussion. -- Tamravidhir ( talk) 09:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Abdulquadir. Although I noticed that you have received various warnings, those are short standard templates, so I will try to explain why your edits were reverted. The encyclopedia's text should be summaries of reliable sources ( WP:RS) and cannot contain our own original research or synthesis ( WP:OR, WP:SYNTH). You were also warned for making personal attacks; discussions on Wikipedia should indeed be about the content and sources rather than about the editors ( WP:TPO and WP:REVTALK for more information). Exceptions are at personal user pages (like this one) and at administrator noticeboards when it is necessary to report a user account for disruptive editing ( WP:ANI). Editing is a privilege, not a right and it is important to work towards WP:CONSENSUS and avoid "edit warring" ( WP:3RR). I suggest to participate at the discussion at the bottom of the Talk:Kolkata talk page, that another editor opened for you. I hope this helps a bit. Please be patient (there is no deadline for article improvements), and happy editing, — Paleo Neonate – 17:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)