Hello, I'm 64andtim. I noticed that in this edit to Slavery in Asia, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 64andtim ( talk to me) 03:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Bruh. Who tf are you? Bot? Aayush Banerjee ( talk) 08:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mughal Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 18:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nauru—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Sati (practice), you may be blocked from editing. — Spaceman Spiff 06:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

that wasn't a personal analysis or synthesis. Now a detailed research and the source of that research has been added by me. Please give it a read. Sorry for editing out of context text. The mistake has been rectified Aayush Banerjee ( talk) 07:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Talikota. — Spaceman Spiff 06:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Spaceman Spiff 05:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to D. N. Jha. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please also review MOS:LEAD. Thank you, Beccaynr ( talk) 13:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Spaceman Spiff 07:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply