![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
... here? Thanks. – Mike. lifeguard | @en.wb 01:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Boozhoo Voice of All, I request for a Bot-assisted changes across all Wikipedia projects:
Reason: http://www.first-ojibwe.net is now defunct, but its user Weshki-ayaad now has her own page. Miigwech for the assistance. CJLippert 18:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Could you tell me what I need to do to my monobook.js to reverse the changes you've made to yours today? Specifically, the UTC Clock, the links in the navbox and toolbox, popups, and the quick warning menu all seem to have disappeared. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 00:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
== That wasn't SPAM, that was REMOVING SPAM! ==
As well as the 1st bot that also posts workarounds! 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 03:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=ATLAS_experiment&diff=176568530&oldid=176568182
If that's a bad edit, I'm a monkey's uncle. MartinBot leaves it alone if you do a direct revert of its changes, but this one isn't noticing. I don't know what youtube link spam looks like, but could the fact that it's wrapped in ref tags and the cite video template be a hint? 71.41.210.146 ( talk) 14:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. :) Please check this- Best regards, — αἰτίας • discussion• 20:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
i used to have the options to revertGF, Revert, and RevertVandal on Firefox, i have been informed this is due to a script you created and have since changed, can you tell me if you have those options in another script for me to use or not as i found them very useful. Skitzo ( talk) 17:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC) it was the Admin-like RC Patrol tools. Skitzo ( talk) 01:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I'm requesting a change to my user name due to my real-life name change. Can you give this a once over and make sure I've got it right? Thanks in advance. [2] (And thanks for your link to "Why People Are Irrational about Politics" -- interesting reading!) - Mdbrownmsw ( talk) 14:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
While
cleaning your
Addtabs you removed addnavbox_link()
which is still used in
adminnolupin. This also might be related to the post above and
Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#VOA Script ∴
AlexSm
18:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you take a look at User:Nishkid64/monobook.js and this? For some reason, the only thing working for me now is popups. :( Nishkid64 ( talk) 02:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Looks like you've been doing a bit of fixing? Anyway, I you a note over here. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: help! 05:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Please note that your bot reverted my edits in error, as I was trying to fix the vandalism, but your bot added it back in... go figure... 80.203.147.174 ( talk) 11:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to
Church of Scientology (
diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits,
vandalism, or
link spam to the page or having an inappropriate
edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the
sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! //
VoABot II (
talk)
11:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm using your admin script (no popups) on Wikibooks; the master rollback functions don't work. When I installed, I copied code over, and removed some parts (if it was WP-specific I took it out). I don't know whether my modifications are responsible or not, but if you'd take a look, I'd be greatly obliged. My original note was here. As well, if you ever plan on doing upgrades, it'd be a great idea to make everything non-project-specific so other wikis can just link to the version here.
Thanks! – Mike. lifeguard | @en.wb 23:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
THIS was neither testing, vandalism, linkspam or "an inappropriate edit summary". For some bizzare reason, removing one link and adding a load of commented out text counts as vandalism, but removing an entire raft of links(pam) isn't. 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 17:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I sincerely thought I was improving the Optimum "L" filter article. The diff makes it look like I deleted nearly the whole article, substituting my own text -- and I understand why you would program a robot to revert that sort of thing. But I only added to the article -- I don't know why "diff" doesn't recognize that the original text is still in the newer version I submitted. Should I try to re-add my additions manually, hoping that this time your robot will see that my edits are good? Or should I simply revert what your robot did, potentially triggering an Wikipedia:Edit war? -- 75.19.73.101 ( talk) 09:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
The identification of ( diff) as vandalism is vague and imprecise. If there's something wrong with the edit then at least tell me what exactly the problem is rather than handing me a laundry list of possible problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.8.12.133 ( talk) 21:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Voice of All.
Can you please coach me to become an administrator? I have listed myself at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching#Current requests just not long ago. I would be appreciated if you want to coach me. Thanks in advance, Greg Jones II 22:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Voice of All.
Could you please fix this so that VoABot reports it to WP:AIV? Thanks, — DerHexer (Talk) 13:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC) P. S.: And your bot shouldn't warn when the vandal is blocked. ;)
I just undid an entry at Eaton Rapids, Michigan by user Therealmykeshaw. You just undid some of that user's 'contributions' elsewhere. Thought you could bring this to the attention of those who should know. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 13:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Stan
This user has requested an unblock. You indefinitely-blocked him just under a month ago with the reason "SEGA". Could you please advise what this means? If he is to remain blocked, please consider unblocking and reblocking with a meaningful reason. Thanks Stifle ( talk) 12:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Please have your bot stop making superfluous reversions. Comments in the text provide explicit reasons the given link should be allowed to be included. Additionally, though I am an IP making this edit, but I am a registered user simply unable to log in while at this location. BQZip01 23:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Why do you think it's vandalism or something: [3]?-- Kidsunited ( talk) 08:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Take care with your bot. The could easily get validated. It was correct.-- Peter Eisenburger ( talk) 08:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Can I ask if your anti vandal bot uses IRC? Thanks. Tbo 157 (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Why did u post the i <333 thing as vandalism? ~(_8(I) HOMER SIMPSON! 05:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudafiery ( talk • contribs)
Just to let you know, your bot reverted an edit of mine incorrectly [4]. Probably because I'm a newly registered user, and my edit reworded the article significantly, removing a lot of data. The edit summary did link to the Talk page entry where I provided rationale for my change. Maybe, if it's not too difficult, you could modify it to make it check if the edit summary links to the talk page. Just a suggestion. Briefplan ( talk) 13:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Why was this flagged as vandalism? It seems this has created some drama. — Random832 20:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
So, uh, is the non-admin js supposed to be working now? I mean, it's not for me, but if it's just me, I can work on that. If not, though, then I'll have to go around trying to find all the parts of that script or live without. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: help! 09:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey... I see you left a message for JFlav that you'd like to see an article on Steven Novella created... I've now used JFlav's subpage as a foundation and gone and created Steven Novella. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look! Mikker (...) 01:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
My article on Kazumi Tanaka has been put up for deletion! Will you help me save it from deletion, please? Kitty53 ( talk) 02:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
seems to be reverting/warning for legitimate edits. I don't want to mess with the settings. Cheers. Dloh cierekim 04:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Piping in about a legit edit that was reverted as possible vandalism. I was given a warning for a perfectly acceptable, good faith edit. -- 69.215.175.202 ( talk) 04:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Have a look at this vandal edit and this VoABot II reversion. For some reason, the bot has, as well as removing the vandalism, removed the "]]" from the end of an earlier link? Any ideas? -- Stormie ( talk) 22:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Same thing happened here [5]. --- RockMFR 06:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Seems this problem is reoccurring. Also here on the One Piece article. – Gunslinger47 06:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
OK, I've changed how saving is done, lets see if that works. Voice-of-All 07:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I edited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaCo . I guess it was thought that I had commited vandalism because the word I wrote in was a swear, but this is actually what should be there ("Golfo" is indeed Spanish for "Manwhore"). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.160.30.184 ( talk) 02:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
[6] Notice under the requests for unprotection is an unanswered request for China that the bot removed. SchmuckyTheCat ( talk)
That wasn't SPAM, that was REMOVING SPAM! 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 22:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
... here? Thanks. – Mike. lifeguard | @en.wb 01:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Boozhoo Voice of All, I request for a Bot-assisted changes across all Wikipedia projects:
Reason: http://www.first-ojibwe.net is now defunct, but its user Weshki-ayaad now has her own page. Miigwech for the assistance. CJLippert 18:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Could you tell me what I need to do to my monobook.js to reverse the changes you've made to yours today? Specifically, the UTC Clock, the links in the navbox and toolbox, popups, and the quick warning menu all seem to have disappeared. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 00:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
== That wasn't SPAM, that was REMOVING SPAM! ==
As well as the 1st bot that also posts workarounds! 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 03:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=ATLAS_experiment&diff=176568530&oldid=176568182
If that's a bad edit, I'm a monkey's uncle. MartinBot leaves it alone if you do a direct revert of its changes, but this one isn't noticing. I don't know what youtube link spam looks like, but could the fact that it's wrapped in ref tags and the cite video template be a hint? 71.41.210.146 ( talk) 14:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello. :) Please check this- Best regards, — αἰτίας • discussion• 20:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
i used to have the options to revertGF, Revert, and RevertVandal on Firefox, i have been informed this is due to a script you created and have since changed, can you tell me if you have those options in another script for me to use or not as i found them very useful. Skitzo ( talk) 17:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC) it was the Admin-like RC Patrol tools. Skitzo ( talk) 01:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I'm requesting a change to my user name due to my real-life name change. Can you give this a once over and make sure I've got it right? Thanks in advance. [2] (And thanks for your link to "Why People Are Irrational about Politics" -- interesting reading!) - Mdbrownmsw ( talk) 14:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
While
cleaning your
Addtabs you removed addnavbox_link()
which is still used in
adminnolupin. This also might be related to the post above and
Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#VOA Script ∴
AlexSm
18:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you take a look at User:Nishkid64/monobook.js and this? For some reason, the only thing working for me now is popups. :( Nishkid64 ( talk) 02:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Looks like you've been doing a bit of fixing? Anyway, I you a note over here. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: help! 05:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Please note that your bot reverted my edits in error, as I was trying to fix the vandalism, but your bot added it back in... go figure... 80.203.147.174 ( talk) 11:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to
Church of Scientology (
diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits,
vandalism, or
link spam to the page or having an inappropriate
edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the
sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! //
VoABot II (
talk)
11:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm using your admin script (no popups) on Wikibooks; the master rollback functions don't work. When I installed, I copied code over, and removed some parts (if it was WP-specific I took it out). I don't know whether my modifications are responsible or not, but if you'd take a look, I'd be greatly obliged. My original note was here. As well, if you ever plan on doing upgrades, it'd be a great idea to make everything non-project-specific so other wikis can just link to the version here.
Thanks! – Mike. lifeguard | @en.wb 23:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
THIS was neither testing, vandalism, linkspam or "an inappropriate edit summary". For some bizzare reason, removing one link and adding a load of commented out text counts as vandalism, but removing an entire raft of links(pam) isn't. 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 17:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I sincerely thought I was improving the Optimum "L" filter article. The diff makes it look like I deleted nearly the whole article, substituting my own text -- and I understand why you would program a robot to revert that sort of thing. But I only added to the article -- I don't know why "diff" doesn't recognize that the original text is still in the newer version I submitted. Should I try to re-add my additions manually, hoping that this time your robot will see that my edits are good? Or should I simply revert what your robot did, potentially triggering an Wikipedia:Edit war? -- 75.19.73.101 ( talk) 09:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
The identification of ( diff) as vandalism is vague and imprecise. If there's something wrong with the edit then at least tell me what exactly the problem is rather than handing me a laundry list of possible problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.8.12.133 ( talk) 21:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Voice of All.
Can you please coach me to become an administrator? I have listed myself at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching#Current requests just not long ago. I would be appreciated if you want to coach me. Thanks in advance, Greg Jones II 22:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Voice of All.
Could you please fix this so that VoABot reports it to WP:AIV? Thanks, — DerHexer (Talk) 13:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC) P. S.: And your bot shouldn't warn when the vandal is blocked. ;)
I just undid an entry at Eaton Rapids, Michigan by user Therealmykeshaw. You just undid some of that user's 'contributions' elsewhere. Thought you could bring this to the attention of those who should know. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 13:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Stan
This user has requested an unblock. You indefinitely-blocked him just under a month ago with the reason "SEGA". Could you please advise what this means? If he is to remain blocked, please consider unblocking and reblocking with a meaningful reason. Thanks Stifle ( talk) 12:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Please have your bot stop making superfluous reversions. Comments in the text provide explicit reasons the given link should be allowed to be included. Additionally, though I am an IP making this edit, but I am a registered user simply unable to log in while at this location. BQZip01 23:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Why do you think it's vandalism or something: [3]?-- Kidsunited ( talk) 08:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Take care with your bot. The could easily get validated. It was correct.-- Peter Eisenburger ( talk) 08:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Can I ask if your anti vandal bot uses IRC? Thanks. Tbo 157 (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Why did u post the i <333 thing as vandalism? ~(_8(I) HOMER SIMPSON! 05:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudafiery ( talk • contribs)
Just to let you know, your bot reverted an edit of mine incorrectly [4]. Probably because I'm a newly registered user, and my edit reworded the article significantly, removing a lot of data. The edit summary did link to the Talk page entry where I provided rationale for my change. Maybe, if it's not too difficult, you could modify it to make it check if the edit summary links to the talk page. Just a suggestion. Briefplan ( talk) 13:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Why was this flagged as vandalism? It seems this has created some drama. — Random832 20:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
So, uh, is the non-admin js supposed to be working now? I mean, it's not for me, but if it's just me, I can work on that. If not, though, then I'll have to go around trying to find all the parts of that script or live without. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: help! 09:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey... I see you left a message for JFlav that you'd like to see an article on Steven Novella created... I've now used JFlav's subpage as a foundation and gone and created Steven Novella. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look! Mikker (...) 01:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
My article on Kazumi Tanaka has been put up for deletion! Will you help me save it from deletion, please? Kitty53 ( talk) 02:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
seems to be reverting/warning for legitimate edits. I don't want to mess with the settings. Cheers. Dloh cierekim 04:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Piping in about a legit edit that was reverted as possible vandalism. I was given a warning for a perfectly acceptable, good faith edit. -- 69.215.175.202 ( talk) 04:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Have a look at this vandal edit and this VoABot II reversion. For some reason, the bot has, as well as removing the vandalism, removed the "]]" from the end of an earlier link? Any ideas? -- Stormie ( talk) 22:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Same thing happened here [5]. --- RockMFR 06:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Seems this problem is reoccurring. Also here on the One Piece article. – Gunslinger47 06:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
OK, I've changed how saving is done, lets see if that works. Voice-of-All 07:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
I edited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaCo . I guess it was thought that I had commited vandalism because the word I wrote in was a swear, but this is actually what should be there ("Golfo" is indeed Spanish for "Manwhore"). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.160.30.184 ( talk) 02:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
[6] Notice under the requests for unprotection is an unanswered request for China that the bot removed. SchmuckyTheCat ( talk)
That wasn't SPAM, that was REMOVING SPAM! 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 22:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)