Please stop doing things like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Extreme_Survival&diff=prev&oldid=1050140633
You may think it's harmless, but every editor who watches the article will be notified of a change, and it wastes our time making sure it is not vandalism. SaltySaltyTears ( talk) 01:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
ㅤ
The file File:Manitoban Flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Redundant to c:File:Flag of Manitoba.svg which is a scalable SVG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Whpq (
talk)
14:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to
naming conventions or
consensus, as you did at
Abortion-rights movements, you may be
blocked from editing.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
01:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Schuylkill, Philadelphia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as
Talk:Yahweh are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are
not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
14:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
U, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
U, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Talk:Yahweh for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the
talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, as you did at
Talk:Yahweh, you may be
blocked from editing.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for
inappropriate discussions, as you did at
Talk:Yahweh.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
--jpgordon
𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇
15:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
19:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for
soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
Talk:Yahweh, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
20:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
22:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ...
discospinster
talk
22:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)is open. @ Discospinster: Unblock? Restore TPA? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 13:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
is open. Leaning unblock. @ Discospinster: Unblock? Restore TPA? Decline? WP:AN? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepfriedokra ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Following UTRS appeal #79429, and having consulted the blocking administrator, I have unblocked your account. I have also renamed your account from "Thewikipedian7534" to "A westman", as you requested at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/112172/view. You should be able to log in with the new username, and the same password as before. JBW ( talk) 20:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 67.226.220.28 (at school, anyway). May [whoever sees this] “soften” my autoblock to only affect anonymous editors on their network so that I may continue contributing? A westman ( talk) 16:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed proxy belonging to Amazon. You'll need to disable your proxy. If you have an exceptional need to edit via a proxy, WP:IPBE may be an option for you, but I'll warn you, it's unlikely to be granted. Yamla ( talk) 16:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a Template:User active edits as well as a Template:User all edits that produce the following user boxes:
12,345 | This user has made 12,345 edits to the English language Wikipedia. |
23,456 | This user has made 23,456 edits to all Wikimedia projects. |
You can of course adapt the source code to make your own userboxes. You should create a user page for your userbox template. Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 17:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Casa de Sante has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
JBW (
talk)
21:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
I see that at Wikipedia:Teahouse you said that you had tried to upload a file using another account. What other accounts apart from this one have you used? JBW ( talk) 21:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Alsu Kurmasheva, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 00:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
I have been looking at your editing since I unblocked your account to give you another chance. I am glad to see that there has been no more of the totally unacceptable kinds of editing that occurred before the block. Thank you for that. However, I think I should warn you that there is a danger that you may be blocked again. I strongly recommend avoiding doing things such as creating joky userboxes and putting a large proportion of you editing into userspace pages, at least until you are much better established as an editor, because it risks giving the impression that you are here more to play around than to work for the encyclopaedia. Also some of your editing really doesn't make much sense; for example your proposal to merge sections from numerous articles on very different topics, just because they all refer to some kinds of needles. It is difficult to imagine how you might imagine that would be helpful. Where would you merge them to? Which article would you choose to contain all that information on so many different topics? And why would that be better than each needle being described in the article where it is relevant? I won't claim to know what your intention was, but it is likely to be seen as another example of playing around: "Ooh! I see that there's something called a merge proposal. I must have a go at one of those." Also if you do have good reasons for proposing a merge then you need to say what those reasons are: just posting a template into the articles and then going away and leaving it without giving any explanation is not helpful. Those are just a couple of examples, but the overall message is that you should try to make sure that all of your editing looks as though its purpose is to improve the encyclopaedia. JBW ( talk) 13:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Also your signature is really unhelpful. A signature on a message should make it easy for other editors to see who wrote the message, which yours doesn't. It should make it easy for anyone with a little experience of editing to see where to click to get to the editor's user talk page, and preferably also to their user page; again, your signature doesn't. Please change your signature. (Also, doing things such as making a joky signature may combine with other things such as making flippant edit boxes and "essays" to increase the impression that you are here more to play than anything else.)
JBW (
talk)
13:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Actually, I have looked at the current version of you signature, and it does make it clear how to get to your talk page, but the rest is still true. JBW ( talk) 14:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
I think you should know that a couple of people have questioned by decsion to change your name, because you are still blocked on Wiktionary, and I shouldn't have accepted your rename request unless you were unblocked everywhere. It is therefore possible that your account may be reverted to its previous username. JBW ( talk) 13:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
18:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Remoive the "retired" and "clean start" part of my user page since apparently I couldn't and can't get a WP:CLEANSTART A westman talk e-mail 20:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
According to the blocking administrator I was blocked because I am "not here to build and encyclopaedia". This sounds ridiculous considering that my edits had not been considered unencyclopaedic (or at least not worthy of blocking) before and the blocking administrator also said that it was "to remove any doubt that they are not eligible for a WP:Cleanstart". Until I know how exactly I am "not here to build an encyclopaedia" I cannot give a better reason to be unblocked.
Decline reason:
In your case, looking over your record, it seems like while you might have made an effort to get over your mistakes and learn from them, it has not been enough and our patience has been exhausted. This has to do with your overall conduct, not any particular edit or set of edits. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I wanted an answer to the last bit of my appeal from my blocking admin. Also the BA said it was in response to [ edit.] A westman talk e-mail
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do, in fact, want to build an encyclopaedia, which is why I want to be unblocked. You may see the edits I have made on the Simple English Wikipaedia and Wiktionary. I will say that some, maybe many of them were unconstructive (especially the Casa de Sante article and the needle merger proposal) and that I edited my userpage far too much (see
this section for more) and I wasted too much time on userboxes, but I knew these were mistakes when I was blocked and I still think they are mistakes. Moreover, I actively tried to lessen the proportion of userspace edits I had. I also followed and talked back to the warning JBW gave me in that section. If I am unblocked, I wish to keep listening that warning. If you want examples of what edits I wish to make, I wish to say so. The next time I want to create an article I wish to write a draft of it first and put it through the approval process.
I now know of my mistake in the wording of my cleanstart notice, which said "I wanted to escape this account's disruptive history" or rather about that (You can see it on my userpage). What happened was after reading what had been said about me at JBW's talk page in archive 83, I wanted to cleanstart, and I put a notice on this account's userpage that said I would cleanstart with an undisclosed account, which led to my current block. That account is
Mayn't. I admit I worded the notice poorly, and it sounded/sounds as if I wish to split my editing history and evade scrutiny. In a nutshell, all I wanted to do was cleanstart. I do not wish to evade scrutiny and if I try to clean start again I will word it better or disclose the account I wish to cleanstart with to make my editing history more visible and allow scrutiny. I likely won't try to cleanstart again for
this section seems to say that they wanted to watch my editing history following the warning, which might be why I was blocked after trying to cleanstart. I don't think the attempted cleanstart is sockpuppetry as I tried to retire this account as I had indicated with {{retired}}. If it is, I did not mean to sockpuppet and wish to review the sockpuppetry rules. If there is another problem with the retired notice please say so: it is on my userpage.
A westman
talk
19:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I see someone who will do whatever they can to edit, regardless of policies. This isn't a contrite stance. I see no reason you shouldn't wait six months from when your block began, and ask for the standard offer. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
If you don't unblock me, I want to sock instead and the block is a phoney unexplained one anyways
You all probably simp for Bbb23 for some reason anyway, all I wanted to do was cleanstart you nazis
Decline reason:
And with that, your talk page access is revoked. Ponyo bons mots 21:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've no idea what is going on. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 17:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I think your problem is more a
lack of competence than
nothere after reading this thread--
#Some advice . It is troubling that you are now on your second indefinite block. It is rare to be unblocked after the second indefinite block. You also created the Mayn't account (
Special:CentralAuth/Mayn't) after your reblock. No it was 2 minutes before. it would help if the timestamps were consistent So again, you are not eligible for unblocking until April 23, 2024. If you achieve unblock and wish to
cleanstart, notify the ArbCom of the connection to the old account. UTRS will read no further appeals until after April 23, 2024. Best
-- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 09:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, A westman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Casa de Sante, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, A westman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Casa de Sante".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop doing things like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Extreme_Survival&diff=prev&oldid=1050140633
You may think it's harmless, but every editor who watches the article will be notified of a change, and it wastes our time making sure it is not vandalism. SaltySaltyTears ( talk) 01:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
ㅤ
The file File:Manitoban Flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Redundant to c:File:Flag of Manitoba.svg which is a scalable SVG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Whpq (
talk)
14:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to
naming conventions or
consensus, as you did at
Abortion-rights movements, you may be
blocked from editing.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
01:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Schuylkill, Philadelphia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as
Talk:Yahweh are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are
not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
14:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
U, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
U, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Talk:Yahweh for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the
talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, as you did at
Talk:Yahweh, you may be
blocked from editing.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for
inappropriate discussions, as you did at
Talk:Yahweh.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
15:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
--jpgordon
𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇
15:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
19:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for
soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
Talk:Yahweh, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
20:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
22:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ...
discospinster
talk
22:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)is open. @ Discospinster: Unblock? Restore TPA? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 13:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
is open. Leaning unblock. @ Discospinster: Unblock? Restore TPA? Decline? WP:AN? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepfriedokra ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Following UTRS appeal #79429, and having consulted the blocking administrator, I have unblocked your account. I have also renamed your account from "Thewikipedian7534" to "A westman", as you requested at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/112172/view. You should be able to log in with the new username, and the same password as before. JBW ( talk) 20:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 67.226.220.28 (at school, anyway). May [whoever sees this] “soften” my autoblock to only affect anonymous editors on their network so that I may continue contributing? A westman ( talk) 16:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed proxy belonging to Amazon. You'll need to disable your proxy. If you have an exceptional need to edit via a proxy, WP:IPBE may be an option for you, but I'll warn you, it's unlikely to be granted. Yamla ( talk) 16:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a Template:User active edits as well as a Template:User all edits that produce the following user boxes:
12,345 | This user has made 12,345 edits to the English language Wikipedia. |
23,456 | This user has made 23,456 edits to all Wikimedia projects. |
You can of course adapt the source code to make your own userboxes. You should create a user page for your userbox template. Yours aye, Buaidh talk e-mail 17:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Casa de Sante has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
JBW (
talk)
21:19, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
I see that at Wikipedia:Teahouse you said that you had tried to upload a file using another account. What other accounts apart from this one have you used? JBW ( talk) 21:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Alsu Kurmasheva, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 00:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
I have been looking at your editing since I unblocked your account to give you another chance. I am glad to see that there has been no more of the totally unacceptable kinds of editing that occurred before the block. Thank you for that. However, I think I should warn you that there is a danger that you may be blocked again. I strongly recommend avoiding doing things such as creating joky userboxes and putting a large proportion of you editing into userspace pages, at least until you are much better established as an editor, because it risks giving the impression that you are here more to play around than to work for the encyclopaedia. Also some of your editing really doesn't make much sense; for example your proposal to merge sections from numerous articles on very different topics, just because they all refer to some kinds of needles. It is difficult to imagine how you might imagine that would be helpful. Where would you merge them to? Which article would you choose to contain all that information on so many different topics? And why would that be better than each needle being described in the article where it is relevant? I won't claim to know what your intention was, but it is likely to be seen as another example of playing around: "Ooh! I see that there's something called a merge proposal. I must have a go at one of those." Also if you do have good reasons for proposing a merge then you need to say what those reasons are: just posting a template into the articles and then going away and leaving it without giving any explanation is not helpful. Those are just a couple of examples, but the overall message is that you should try to make sure that all of your editing looks as though its purpose is to improve the encyclopaedia. JBW ( talk) 13:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Also your signature is really unhelpful. A signature on a message should make it easy for other editors to see who wrote the message, which yours doesn't. It should make it easy for anyone with a little experience of editing to see where to click to get to the editor's user talk page, and preferably also to their user page; again, your signature doesn't. Please change your signature. (Also, doing things such as making a joky signature may combine with other things such as making flippant edit boxes and "essays" to increase the impression that you are here more to play than anything else.)
JBW (
talk)
13:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Actually, I have looked at the current version of you signature, and it does make it clear how to get to your talk page, but the rest is still true. JBW ( talk) 14:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
I think you should know that a couple of people have questioned by decsion to change your name, because you are still blocked on Wiktionary, and I shouldn't have accepted your rename request unless you were unblocked everywhere. It is therefore possible that your account may be reverted to its previous username. JBW ( talk) 13:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
18:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Remoive the "retired" and "clean start" part of my user page since apparently I couldn't and can't get a WP:CLEANSTART A westman talk e-mail 20:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
According to the blocking administrator I was blocked because I am "not here to build and encyclopaedia". This sounds ridiculous considering that my edits had not been considered unencyclopaedic (or at least not worthy of blocking) before and the blocking administrator also said that it was "to remove any doubt that they are not eligible for a WP:Cleanstart". Until I know how exactly I am "not here to build an encyclopaedia" I cannot give a better reason to be unblocked.
Decline reason:
In your case, looking over your record, it seems like while you might have made an effort to get over your mistakes and learn from them, it has not been enough and our patience has been exhausted. This has to do with your overall conduct, not any particular edit or set of edits. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I wanted an answer to the last bit of my appeal from my blocking admin. Also the BA said it was in response to [ edit.] A westman talk e-mail
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do, in fact, want to build an encyclopaedia, which is why I want to be unblocked. You may see the edits I have made on the Simple English Wikipaedia and Wiktionary. I will say that some, maybe many of them were unconstructive (especially the Casa de Sante article and the needle merger proposal) and that I edited my userpage far too much (see
this section for more) and I wasted too much time on userboxes, but I knew these were mistakes when I was blocked and I still think they are mistakes. Moreover, I actively tried to lessen the proportion of userspace edits I had. I also followed and talked back to the warning JBW gave me in that section. If I am unblocked, I wish to keep listening that warning. If you want examples of what edits I wish to make, I wish to say so. The next time I want to create an article I wish to write a draft of it first and put it through the approval process.
I now know of my mistake in the wording of my cleanstart notice, which said "I wanted to escape this account's disruptive history" or rather about that (You can see it on my userpage). What happened was after reading what had been said about me at JBW's talk page in archive 83, I wanted to cleanstart, and I put a notice on this account's userpage that said I would cleanstart with an undisclosed account, which led to my current block. That account is
Mayn't. I admit I worded the notice poorly, and it sounded/sounds as if I wish to split my editing history and evade scrutiny. In a nutshell, all I wanted to do was cleanstart. I do not wish to evade scrutiny and if I try to clean start again I will word it better or disclose the account I wish to cleanstart with to make my editing history more visible and allow scrutiny. I likely won't try to cleanstart again for
this section seems to say that they wanted to watch my editing history following the warning, which might be why I was blocked after trying to cleanstart. I don't think the attempted cleanstart is sockpuppetry as I tried to retire this account as I had indicated with {{retired}}. If it is, I did not mean to sockpuppet and wish to review the sockpuppetry rules. If there is another problem with the retired notice please say so: it is on my userpage.
A westman
talk
19:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I see someone who will do whatever they can to edit, regardless of policies. This isn't a contrite stance. I see no reason you shouldn't wait six months from when your block began, and ask for the standard offer. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A westman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
If you don't unblock me, I want to sock instead and the block is a phoney unexplained one anyways
You all probably simp for Bbb23 for some reason anyway, all I wanted to do was cleanstart you nazis
Decline reason:
And with that, your talk page access is revoked. Ponyo bons mots 21:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I've no idea what is going on. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 17:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I think your problem is more a
lack of competence than
nothere after reading this thread--
#Some advice . It is troubling that you are now on your second indefinite block. It is rare to be unblocked after the second indefinite block. You also created the Mayn't account (
Special:CentralAuth/Mayn't) after your reblock. No it was 2 minutes before. it would help if the timestamps were consistent So again, you are not eligible for unblocking until April 23, 2024. If you achieve unblock and wish to
cleanstart, notify the ArbCom of the connection to the old account. UTRS will read no further appeals until after April 23, 2024. Best
-- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 09:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, A westman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Casa de Sante, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, A westman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Casa de Sante".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)