This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, APK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Ye Olde Luke (
talk)
07:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello AgnosticPreachersKid. When you edited Jumeirah Beach Hotel, I decided it was time that the article got a makeover. {{ Unreferenced}} and {{ Advert}} had been there too long. I knew that if I did not improve it at that time, then I would never do it. When I was done, I thought that maybe I had included some POV. But, you did not mention it, so I guess I did a good job.
You said "we have the same interest in Dubai." So I thought you may be interested in WikiProject Dubai. I am currently setting up the project with another user. As of now, it is on a temporary page. If you are interested, go to User:Raime/WikiProject Dubai to add your name. Thank you. Leitmanp ( talk | contributions) 19:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
In my opinion, all political parties are bad. Though America was intended to be a democracy, the government is run by the parties, not the people. The people running the parties are only a small minority, yet they control the entire country. In fact, the Democratic and Republican parties would rather have one of the other get elected than have an Independent in the government. George Washington, who was one of the wisest men of his time, said that "They [political parties] serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community." What makes your party better than the Democrats or Republicans if someone were to be elected from your party? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4like234 ( talk • contribs) 16:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
i didn't know that the days weren't supposed to be included (the delta flight to cancun)...thanks for the heads up...i'm new to editing, so mistakes are inevitable. p.s. i'm sure you've been asked before, but how do you get the user boxes, etc. on your profile? gracias.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 22:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Your edit removed this reference to a British newspaper [1], which discusses Jena and "stealth racism". Catchpole ( talk) 08:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I just thought I'd let you know that I cracked up when I saw your username. That's for brightening up my day! :) — Mears man ( talk) 19:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Did you want to leave the population table the way it is or update it with the 2006 population found right beside it. If you think it should stay the same since it has the census from every 10 years (1985, 1995, 2005), then that's totally cool.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 03:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
i want to help merge some of the articles mentioned on the project page, but i've never merged an article before. i've tried to search for the instructions on the wiki help pages, but i think it's the move button at top? i don't want to mess with it in case i'm doing it wrong. anyway, sorry to bug you about it, but if you can tell me how to merge articles i'd appreciate it.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 00:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
#REDIRECT [[NEW MERGED ARTICLE NAME HERE]] {{R from merge}}
. Use
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jumeirah_Al_Khor_Residence&action=edit as an example. Then, go to their talk pages and replace the information with #REDIRECT [[Talk:NEW MERGED ARTICLE NAME HERE]]
. But, this should only be done if the only thing on the talk page are project banners. If there are other things, such as a discussion or an AFD tag, use
Talk:Churchill Residency and
Talk:Emirates Park Tower 1 as examples. After that, go back to
where you started to cross out the articles that were merged. You should inlcude an edit summary for each edit you make. Follow the same format as the summaries
User:Raime and I have been using.
FYI, user Earle Martin has unilaterally removed the trivia tag you added at Abu Dhabi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.136.224.10 ( talk) 23:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding Bwkodiak ( talk · contribs) and Riley Skinner, it's helpful to explain the issue to the user rather than leaving a vandalism template and reverting his question on your talk page. The reason this content is inappropriate is because of WP:BLP. Everyone adding it is doing so in good faith - the content is obviously 100% completely inappropriate for Wikipedia until such time as the news media picks up on it, but it's still helpful to engage users with information about the biographies of living persons policy rather than to call the additions vandalism. -- B ( talk) 01:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't get what you are doing with Kinston. There are quite enough notable people who were actually born there without including everyone who has ever resided there. Everyone who has ever played for Kinston's baseball teams, for example, has resided there. Then, oddly enough, despite broadening the category, you feel the need to eliminate people who were genuinely born there. If you don't feel they are notable and they are self-promotional as you claimed in your edit note, put their articles up for afd. Two of the four you eliminated are gospel performers and one of the others is a conservative activist which makes one wonder what your true intentions in eliminating those specific people are. It is my position that as long as they have valid Wikipedia articles that haven't been deleted through consensus over time, they are, by definition, notable by Wikipedia's standards. Kinston eagle ( talk) 02:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I'll be sure to keep a close eye on it. » AIAN ANDREJI BINLAYO ( T/ C) 01:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
{{ help}} How do I revert an article to the version before an edit war? 76.220.202.205, a sock puppet of Leaveout, is making ALOT of POV edits to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Theo van Gogh (film director) articles. Both of these articles are of controversial people and a few of us have tried to tell the User to stop making the edits without building a consensus on the talk page. He/She will not stop editing. I've reported the article to be protected, but no help has come. Can someone PLEASE tell me how to revert an article back to an earlier version. I only know how to revert the last edit done to an article.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 13:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, the 3RR violation didn't take long.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 13:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
So here it its, your first barnstar, and hopefully not your last. :)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Given to you for your efforts to improve wikipedia's articles and while staying neutral. keep up the good work. Kerotan Leave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 15:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
& didn't see ur question till just now. I guess that was prolly two hours ago. I see there was someone here to help with that though. Cheers... E_dog95' Hi ' 14:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thanks for protecting the Ayaan Hirsi Ali article, but the POV vandalism made by the User is now the current version. Is it possible to revert it back to the version before the editing of Leaveout and his/her sockpuppet 76.220.202.205 because now the article is stuck just the way he/she wanted it. Thanks.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 13:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
You mean you're the child of an agnostic preacher??? :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it's true all sinners will burn in hell. Fortunately, given Global Warming, it won't be too much of a change. That reminds me... Falwell had wanted to be cremated, but the Fire Marshall nixed it due to an ordinance restricting the size of fires. That's too bad, as he could have made a significant dent in his school's energy bill for a month or so. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 14:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Consider joining the gayass cabal WikiProject?
Sign up here. --
SatyrTN (
talk /
contribs)
03:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, APK, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
-- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 03:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey APK, I thought I'd let you know that for the flag of Georgia, you have the flag of Georgia (country), rather than that of Georgia (U.S. state). :) Aleta (Sing) 04:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey man, glad you picked up on the error! I've been through the SC town and didn't realize there was also a Greenville, NC....hence I leaped to a mistaken conclusion. Also, didn't realize you were working on GA status, or I wouldn't have messed with the article at all. Good luck with that! :o) Textorus ( talk) 02:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you would do well to start using a cite format every time you add a reference. This will help others see the quality of the citation as well as date when this information was on the page in question. In this way we can use an online archive to access the content even if his website were to disappear. Click edit to see formatting appearance in articles.
Please note - access date format 2007-06-16. Benji boi 08:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)
Feel free to use this one. :P - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I hope you don't think I'm being a dick. That's just one of my pet peeves...labelling gay people that don't want to be known as "the gay" person. People that prefer to be labelled or known for being gay is cool with me, just not people that don't like it. But yeah, I think the rewrite Leibovits suggested is ok as well...if that info has to be included.
..he says as if I don't already know. lol You'll get a lot of things if you screw on the balcony of OZ, not just beads. :P - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I need some feedback on the article I worked on this morning, Navy Yard/Near Southeast I changed it alot and would appreciate the feedback. Gracias mi amigos/amigas.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 19:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
You can consider it whatever you want to consider it ,If it do not have a reliable source I will take it out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.104.238.191 ( talk) 07:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in participating in the discussion at User talk:Hyacinth/User categories#Proposal. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 01:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Based on the userboxes you have at the moment, you might like to consider adding one of these to your collection:
{{User:Photouploaded/gayass-queer}}
Gay |
This user's flame burns phenomenally bright, as this user is decidedly queer and is an official Gayass Wikipedian! |
Ass |
or
{{User:Allstarecho/gayass}}
Gay |
This user's flame burns phenomenally bright, as this user is an avowed homosexual and official Gayass Wikipedian! |
Ass |
We aren't allowed to have a
category:Gayass Wikipedians, but we've still got the userbox! :)
Also, I noticed that you have said you were in gay porn, and I was wondering whether you might consider identifying your porn identity. I understand if you don't want to - I'm just curious. Best,
Jay*Jay (
talk)
11:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
LOL - well then, I definitely haven't seen any of your work! Debbie doing Dallas doesn't do anything for me. BTW, thanks - you made me smile, which is definitely a step up on the rest of today. :) Jay*Jay ( talk) 11:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I just checked the release date - 1978 - so I can't quite say the same, unfortunately. I really must be getting way old. :( Jay*Jay ( talk) 12:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I am sorry that you feel like it is vandalism, but if it is wrong or have no source I will take it out. PS I will also be watching you like a Hawk also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.104.238.191 ( talk) 00:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
In response to your request for me to add citations to the addition I made to the Washington D.C. paragraph about the 2002 Snipers earlier this month, I feel sure that I don't need to enter any, as the additions that I added to it are a matter of common knowledge, and the info I added is easily confirmed via the archives of many news sites. In addition, good citations are given on the Wikipedia page Beltway sniper attacks, which I linked to. Though the majority of those serial shootings did not actually take place within D.C., they were centred on that city, and they are strongly associated with it, to the extent that the Muhammad and Malvo are very often referred to as the Washington snipers. For the article to be complete, the info I added, incuding a link to the aforementioned serial killings must be included in the History portion of the article as they are, unfortunately, a major part of the U.S. capital's recent history. If you still think I need to add any citations, please tell me exactly what I need to prove. I only started editing Wikipedia last month (January 2008). Werdnawerdna ( talk) 19:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Brannan. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 20:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, APK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Ye Olde Luke (
talk)
07:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello AgnosticPreachersKid. When you edited Jumeirah Beach Hotel, I decided it was time that the article got a makeover. {{ Unreferenced}} and {{ Advert}} had been there too long. I knew that if I did not improve it at that time, then I would never do it. When I was done, I thought that maybe I had included some POV. But, you did not mention it, so I guess I did a good job.
You said "we have the same interest in Dubai." So I thought you may be interested in WikiProject Dubai. I am currently setting up the project with another user. As of now, it is on a temporary page. If you are interested, go to User:Raime/WikiProject Dubai to add your name. Thank you. Leitmanp ( talk | contributions) 19:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
In my opinion, all political parties are bad. Though America was intended to be a democracy, the government is run by the parties, not the people. The people running the parties are only a small minority, yet they control the entire country. In fact, the Democratic and Republican parties would rather have one of the other get elected than have an Independent in the government. George Washington, who was one of the wisest men of his time, said that "They [political parties] serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community." What makes your party better than the Democrats or Republicans if someone were to be elected from your party? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4like234 ( talk • contribs) 16:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
i didn't know that the days weren't supposed to be included (the delta flight to cancun)...thanks for the heads up...i'm new to editing, so mistakes are inevitable. p.s. i'm sure you've been asked before, but how do you get the user boxes, etc. on your profile? gracias.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 22:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Your edit removed this reference to a British newspaper [1], which discusses Jena and "stealth racism". Catchpole ( talk) 08:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I just thought I'd let you know that I cracked up when I saw your username. That's for brightening up my day! :) — Mears man ( talk) 19:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Did you want to leave the population table the way it is or update it with the 2006 population found right beside it. If you think it should stay the same since it has the census from every 10 years (1985, 1995, 2005), then that's totally cool.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 03:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
i want to help merge some of the articles mentioned on the project page, but i've never merged an article before. i've tried to search for the instructions on the wiki help pages, but i think it's the move button at top? i don't want to mess with it in case i'm doing it wrong. anyway, sorry to bug you about it, but if you can tell me how to merge articles i'd appreciate it.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 00:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
#REDIRECT [[NEW MERGED ARTICLE NAME HERE]] {{R from merge}}
. Use
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jumeirah_Al_Khor_Residence&action=edit as an example. Then, go to their talk pages and replace the information with #REDIRECT [[Talk:NEW MERGED ARTICLE NAME HERE]]
. But, this should only be done if the only thing on the talk page are project banners. If there are other things, such as a discussion or an AFD tag, use
Talk:Churchill Residency and
Talk:Emirates Park Tower 1 as examples. After that, go back to
where you started to cross out the articles that were merged. You should inlcude an edit summary for each edit you make. Follow the same format as the summaries
User:Raime and I have been using.
FYI, user Earle Martin has unilaterally removed the trivia tag you added at Abu Dhabi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.136.224.10 ( talk) 23:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding Bwkodiak ( talk · contribs) and Riley Skinner, it's helpful to explain the issue to the user rather than leaving a vandalism template and reverting his question on your talk page. The reason this content is inappropriate is because of WP:BLP. Everyone adding it is doing so in good faith - the content is obviously 100% completely inappropriate for Wikipedia until such time as the news media picks up on it, but it's still helpful to engage users with information about the biographies of living persons policy rather than to call the additions vandalism. -- B ( talk) 01:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't get what you are doing with Kinston. There are quite enough notable people who were actually born there without including everyone who has ever resided there. Everyone who has ever played for Kinston's baseball teams, for example, has resided there. Then, oddly enough, despite broadening the category, you feel the need to eliminate people who were genuinely born there. If you don't feel they are notable and they are self-promotional as you claimed in your edit note, put their articles up for afd. Two of the four you eliminated are gospel performers and one of the others is a conservative activist which makes one wonder what your true intentions in eliminating those specific people are. It is my position that as long as they have valid Wikipedia articles that haven't been deleted through consensus over time, they are, by definition, notable by Wikipedia's standards. Kinston eagle ( talk) 02:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. I'll be sure to keep a close eye on it. » AIAN ANDREJI BINLAYO ( T/ C) 01:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
{{ help}} How do I revert an article to the version before an edit war? 76.220.202.205, a sock puppet of Leaveout, is making ALOT of POV edits to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Theo van Gogh (film director) articles. Both of these articles are of controversial people and a few of us have tried to tell the User to stop making the edits without building a consensus on the talk page. He/She will not stop editing. I've reported the article to be protected, but no help has come. Can someone PLEASE tell me how to revert an article back to an earlier version. I only know how to revert the last edit done to an article.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 13:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, the 3RR violation didn't take long.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 13:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
So here it its, your first barnstar, and hopefully not your last. :)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Given to you for your efforts to improve wikipedia's articles and while staying neutral. keep up the good work. Kerotan Leave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 15:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
& didn't see ur question till just now. I guess that was prolly two hours ago. I see there was someone here to help with that though. Cheers... E_dog95' Hi ' 14:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thanks for protecting the Ayaan Hirsi Ali article, but the POV vandalism made by the User is now the current version. Is it possible to revert it back to the version before the editing of Leaveout and his/her sockpuppet 76.220.202.205 because now the article is stuck just the way he/she wanted it. Thanks.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 13:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
You mean you're the child of an agnostic preacher??? :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 13:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it's true all sinners will burn in hell. Fortunately, given Global Warming, it won't be too much of a change. That reminds me... Falwell had wanted to be cremated, but the Fire Marshall nixed it due to an ordinance restricting the size of fires. That's too bad, as he could have made a significant dent in his school's energy bill for a month or so. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 14:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Consider joining the gayass cabal WikiProject?
Sign up here. --
SatyrTN (
talk /
contribs)
03:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, APK, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
-- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 03:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey APK, I thought I'd let you know that for the flag of Georgia, you have the flag of Georgia (country), rather than that of Georgia (U.S. state). :) Aleta (Sing) 04:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey man, glad you picked up on the error! I've been through the SC town and didn't realize there was also a Greenville, NC....hence I leaped to a mistaken conclusion. Also, didn't realize you were working on GA status, or I wouldn't have messed with the article at all. Good luck with that! :o) Textorus ( talk) 02:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you would do well to start using a cite format every time you add a reference. This will help others see the quality of the citation as well as date when this information was on the page in question. In this way we can use an online archive to access the content even if his website were to disappear. Click edit to see formatting appearance in articles.
Please note - access date format 2007-06-16. Benji boi 08:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help)
Feel free to use this one. :P - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I hope you don't think I'm being a dick. That's just one of my pet peeves...labelling gay people that don't want to be known as "the gay" person. People that prefer to be labelled or known for being gay is cool with me, just not people that don't like it. But yeah, I think the rewrite Leibovits suggested is ok as well...if that info has to be included.
..he says as if I don't already know. lol You'll get a lot of things if you screw on the balcony of OZ, not just beads. :P - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 09:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I need some feedback on the article I worked on this morning, Navy Yard/Near Southeast I changed it alot and would appreciate the feedback. Gracias mi amigos/amigas.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 19:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
You can consider it whatever you want to consider it ,If it do not have a reliable source I will take it out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.104.238.191 ( talk) 07:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in participating in the discussion at User talk:Hyacinth/User categories#Proposal. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 01:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Based on the userboxes you have at the moment, you might like to consider adding one of these to your collection:
{{User:Photouploaded/gayass-queer}}
Gay |
This user's flame burns phenomenally bright, as this user is decidedly queer and is an official Gayass Wikipedian! |
Ass |
or
{{User:Allstarecho/gayass}}
Gay |
This user's flame burns phenomenally bright, as this user is an avowed homosexual and official Gayass Wikipedian! |
Ass |
We aren't allowed to have a
category:Gayass Wikipedians, but we've still got the userbox! :)
Also, I noticed that you have said you were in gay porn, and I was wondering whether you might consider identifying your porn identity. I understand if you don't want to - I'm just curious. Best,
Jay*Jay (
talk)
11:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
LOL - well then, I definitely haven't seen any of your work! Debbie doing Dallas doesn't do anything for me. BTW, thanks - you made me smile, which is definitely a step up on the rest of today. :) Jay*Jay ( talk) 11:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I just checked the release date - 1978 - so I can't quite say the same, unfortunately. I really must be getting way old. :( Jay*Jay ( talk) 12:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I am sorry that you feel like it is vandalism, but if it is wrong or have no source I will take it out. PS I will also be watching you like a Hawk also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.104.238.191 ( talk) 00:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
In response to your request for me to add citations to the addition I made to the Washington D.C. paragraph about the 2002 Snipers earlier this month, I feel sure that I don't need to enter any, as the additions that I added to it are a matter of common knowledge, and the info I added is easily confirmed via the archives of many news sites. In addition, good citations are given on the Wikipedia page Beltway sniper attacks, which I linked to. Though the majority of those serial shootings did not actually take place within D.C., they were centred on that city, and they are strongly associated with it, to the extent that the Muhammad and Malvo are very often referred to as the Washington snipers. For the article to be complete, the info I added, incuding a link to the aforementioned serial killings must be included in the History portion of the article as they are, unfortunately, a major part of the U.S. capital's recent history. If you still think I need to add any citations, please tell me exactly what I need to prove. I only started editing Wikipedia last month (January 2008). Werdnawerdna ( talk) 19:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Brannan. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 20:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)