Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
soft block using
Template:Anonblock.
![]() |
![]() | This
IP address has been repeatedly
blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to
abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
![]() | This account is a suspected
sockpuppet of
Kompress0 (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs) and has been
blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
![]() |
|
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Flint River Academy. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Jacona (
talk)
19:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You are missing the point here. Per WP:BRD, you made a:
Anyone can just continually hit "undo", becuase they think they're right. That is why we have talk pages, and policies against such behaviour, otherwise it becomes disrupritive. As for the RSA syndrome page, the entry you keep removing is supported by sourcing and consensus. Your edit has neither. It has also been discussed before, but feel free to bring it up again. But first, you really should self-revert. Thanks - wolf 20:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 20:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Flint River Academy, you may be
blocked from editing. —
Moops ⋠
T⋡
20:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You are now involved in edit wars on two differenrt articles. Is there some reason why you refuse to simply go to the talk pages and discuss, as is required by our policies? Simply hitting 'undo' repeatedly is not the way to go about making any changes you seek. (courtesy ping: Jacona) - wolf 20:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. -
wolf
20:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This has fast become net-negative. C.Fred, along with the extended comments here, (with yet more personal attacks), this user has bombarded the RAS tp thread with more comments, such as:
"I'll 'let it go' when right finally prevails instead of a bunch of petulant children who just want their way because "B-but that's just the way it's always been".
",
And then, before I had a chance to reply, or had even returned to WP:
"Ok well if you're just going to ignore my points, I'm going to go back to editing the page based on the fact that I'm correct.
".
Whether this is an angry, evading sock user just looking to push disputes, or someone new to WP with a WP:CIR issue, and is just generally hostile with a "must have my way" type attitude, their worthwhile contributions at this point are nil, they've made no effort to collaborate or learn any policies & guidelines to help contribute or avoid disruption, and meanwhile, they seem to think bludgeoning, insulting and edit-warring to have their way is only way to build and improve content. - wolf 17:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
C.Fred (
talk)
20:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)97.112.217.211 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I should be unblocked because I was correct, or the other two users should also be blocked for also engaging in edit warring.
Decline reason:
Being correct does not allow you to engage in edit warring. Everyone involved in edit warring believes they are correct. What's happened to other users is not relevant to your request. Yamla ( talk) 21:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You can add all the incorrect sources in the world, they're still incorrectIt
Is
Not
A
Redundancy
"
Still does not justify you removing that entry, (x3, within minutes of your edit warring block expiring and an admin warning you not to do it). I strongly suggest you self-revert. - wolf 02:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
RAS Syndrome. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cnilep ( talk) 02:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Cnilep (
talk)
02:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Also, please don't post personal attacks, such as this edit summary, focus on edits, not editors. Thank you - wolf 20:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
"Did you ever consider there's a reason they wanted away from them in the first place?
" - I'm also curious; by "they" do you mean "white people", and by "them" do you mean "black people"? If not, feel free to clarify. Thanks -
wolf
17:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
03:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)97.112.217.211 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The issue was resolved 97.112.217.211 ( talk) 03:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That doesn't undo the edit warring. 331dot ( talk) 05:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Which "issue" was resolved? Clearly not the content dispute, as the edits at RAS syndrome show. Clearly not your behaviour, as your edits to the same article show. For anybody to consider unblocking you, you will need to demonstrate that you understand the guidelines on edit warring and agree to follow them. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
soft block using
Template:Anonblock.
![]() |
![]() | This
IP address has been repeatedly
blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to
abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
![]() | This account is a suspected
sockpuppet of
Kompress0 (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs) and has been
blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
![]() |
|
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Flint River Academy. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Jacona (
talk)
19:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You are missing the point here. Per WP:BRD, you made a:
Anyone can just continually hit "undo", becuase they think they're right. That is why we have talk pages, and policies against such behaviour, otherwise it becomes disrupritive. As for the RSA syndrome page, the entry you keep removing is supported by sourcing and consensus. Your edit has neither. It has also been discussed before, but feel free to bring it up again. But first, you really should self-revert. Thanks - wolf 20:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 20:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Flint River Academy, you may be
blocked from editing. —
Moops ⋠
T⋡
20:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
You are now involved in edit wars on two differenrt articles. Is there some reason why you refuse to simply go to the talk pages and discuss, as is required by our policies? Simply hitting 'undo' repeatedly is not the way to go about making any changes you seek. (courtesy ping: Jacona) - wolf 20:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. -
wolf
20:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This has fast become net-negative. C.Fred, along with the extended comments here, (with yet more personal attacks), this user has bombarded the RAS tp thread with more comments, such as:
"I'll 'let it go' when right finally prevails instead of a bunch of petulant children who just want their way because "B-but that's just the way it's always been".
",
And then, before I had a chance to reply, or had even returned to WP:
"Ok well if you're just going to ignore my points, I'm going to go back to editing the page based on the fact that I'm correct.
".
Whether this is an angry, evading sock user just looking to push disputes, or someone new to WP with a WP:CIR issue, and is just generally hostile with a "must have my way" type attitude, their worthwhile contributions at this point are nil, they've made no effort to collaborate or learn any policies & guidelines to help contribute or avoid disruption, and meanwhile, they seem to think bludgeoning, insulting and edit-warring to have their way is only way to build and improve content. - wolf 17:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
C.Fred (
talk)
20:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)97.112.217.211 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I should be unblocked because I was correct, or the other two users should also be blocked for also engaging in edit warring.
Decline reason:
Being correct does not allow you to engage in edit warring. Everyone involved in edit warring believes they are correct. What's happened to other users is not relevant to your request. Yamla ( talk) 21:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You can add all the incorrect sources in the world, they're still incorrectIt
Is
Not
A
Redundancy
"
Still does not justify you removing that entry, (x3, within minutes of your edit warring block expiring and an admin warning you not to do it). I strongly suggest you self-revert. - wolf 02:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
RAS Syndrome. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cnilep ( talk) 02:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Cnilep (
talk)
02:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Also, please don't post personal attacks, such as this edit summary, focus on edits, not editors. Thank you - wolf 20:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
"Did you ever consider there's a reason they wanted away from them in the first place?
" - I'm also curious; by "they" do you mean "white people", and by "them" do you mean "black people"? If not, feel free to clarify. Thanks -
wolf
17:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
03:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)97.112.217.211 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The issue was resolved 97.112.217.211 ( talk) 03:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That doesn't undo the edit warring. 331dot ( talk) 05:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Which "issue" was resolved? Clearly not the content dispute, as the edits at RAS syndrome show. Clearly not your behaviour, as your edits to the same article show. For anybody to consider unblocking you, you will need to demonstrate that you understand the guidelines on edit warring and agree to follow them. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |