This is my Talk Page. Please post content disputes in its correspondent article's talk page. Feel free to post any other inquieries here.
![]() |
Hi 92slim! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC) |
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence
Amalek. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Only notifying other editors of a dispute who have the same point of view as your own, as you did
here and
here, is improper "vote stacking" canvassing. If you are going to notify other users of a dispute, you need to either notify people of both points of view or, better, use a
RFC to draw in editors of all persuasions.
TransporterMan (
TALK) 19:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC) PS: Since you're new here, please take the foregoing as just education, not a warning. I'm sure you didn't mean any harm by notifying those editors and in places other than Wikipedia it would have been understandable, fairly normal conduct. No real harm done this time, probably, but you can't do it any more. Regards,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
19:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice. I am only starting to understand how to navigate these shores. -- 92slim ( talk) 03:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Have you read the article ? its nothing new actually, I just cut all the sections about the controversy and pasted them in one place. There is no theories, the article only give you a summary of what happened and the nature of the conflict ! you should read before getting aggressive.
I reverted your edit because we dont need a Wikipedia:Content forking-- Attar-Aram syria ( talk) 14:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately, that is what is been done in that article. Things being deleted and replaced is a way to fork content. -- 92slim ( talk) 14:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Hallo 92slim, thanks for writing! Unfortunately I have at present no time to join the discussion , since I am moving. :-( After having read the contributions, I think that the problem there is about the reliability of the given heterogeneous sources. About that, you could try to post a question to the Reliable sources Noticeboard. Alex2006 ( talk) 08:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
What do you think about merging Malta exiles article with Effort to prosecute Ottoman war criminals? They're both practically the same info. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 07:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand what you expect regarding the article. I don't edit regularly here anymore, but as I told you, I am available if you have any questions or worries regarding that article or related topics. What do you mean by "help with the article"? In my opinion, and as I wrote on the talk page, there are no major issues with it, even though the style could be improved here or there. What would your concerns be? In any case, I don't really know who's active these days in that area, I only remember Kober as an editor knowledgeable in Georgian topics and nice to work with. Hope that helps, and please follow up with me if you have more specific questions. Susuman77 ( talk) 22:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
Posts at ANI are archived rather than being deleted so as to ensure that an accurate history of what has happened there is recorded. If you've made a post there and it no longer needs dealing with just mention that its dealt with and someone will close it down. Hope that makes sense. Let me know if you need any further clarification. Amortias ( T)( C) 19:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I want to point out that repeatedly accusing someone of being a sockmaster is a personal attack, even if you add an "alleged" to it. The SPI against Tiptoe did not find him guilty as accused, so drop it. Thomas.W talk 15:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "92slim". The reason given for 92slim's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".
Accept reason: The IP was blocked because it was used while the account was still blocked, but that shouldn't have affected your account once the block on the account ran out. Huon ( talk) 21:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: After this unblock, I took notice that the user (User:Wikimandia) who so avidly requested me being blocked, after vandalizing my talk page, refusing to engage in constructive AfD discussion and showing innapropiate childish behaviour and false edit summaries (hint: WP:GAME) in a WP:POVFORK article was blocked for a week [1]. I guess that is what happens to those who engage in WP:HOUNDING and end up messing the reasonable discussion process along with blatantly false accusations of POV and vandalism. -- 92slim ( talk) 20:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please see my comment on your request at WP:RMTR. — BarrelProof ( talk) 07:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi 92slim. I'm glad that you're trying to get the Hovhannes Kajaznuni article to flow a little better. I came across it and couldn't avoid fixing some of the inelegant phrasing, even though I have no special knowledge of the topic. However, I wanted to bring up a couple of points. First, Wikipedia's style is not to place quoted material in italics, with a few exceptions. The quotation marks on their own make clear that this is quoted text. Also, I see that you say there is no abridged version of Kajaznuni's 1923 report. However, Callender's translation explicitly states on page 8:
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE: Up to this point the words of the author have been translated verbatim in order to give an idea of Mr. Katchaznouni's logical mind and the exposition of the facts that drove him to present his "Manifesto" to his colleagues at the 1923 Convention. From here on, and solely for the sake of brevity, we shall quote excerpts of his arguments which led to his decision as to why the Dashnagtzoutiun, in his opinion, should "decisively end its existence" because "there is no work for the Party."
Can you clarify what you mean when you say there's no abridged version? Thanks. Rupert Clayton ( talk) 22:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
Legal status of polygamy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Edits were on June 26. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
16:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I believe Khojaly should not be included because it is talking about anti-Azerbaijani sentiment in Armenia. Khojaly is not in Armenia. If something happened in Yerevan, Gyumri, or any other territory of Armenia then obviously it should be added but since that city is not in Armenia it should not be added. Ninetoyadome ( talk) 03:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey 92slim,
Would you be able to give me a link where its stated that the Erivan Khanate flag is located in the Museum of the History of Azerbaijan? [2] Thanks much! - LouisAragon ( talk) 21:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Since your previous edits, before your last revert, restored material which was previously removed, with discussion on talk, you have just broken the 1 revert restriction which is in place on the article. I guess you might have forgotten that the article was subject to a 1RR limitation so I'll assume good faith and simply ask you to self revert. Please. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 23:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
I'll also put aside the issue, for the moment, that what you are doing is grossly misrepresenting sources and engaging in POV original research intended to smear a living person which is a violation of WP:BLP. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 23:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.EdJohnston ( talk) 21:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 92slim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello 92slim. All or some of your addition(s) to
Armenian mafia has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 13:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
@ Diannaa: The content you deleted is not copied from hyeforum.com. In fact, it's from a WebArchive of armenianow.com, a secondary source( link here). Perhaps recheck your supposed copyright. -- 92slim ( talk) 16:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Would you mind commenting at User talk:Izno#Polygyny? -- Izno ( talk) 13:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
I have replied to the message you left on my talk page. Please could you respond to my comments there? Thanks, zazpot ( talk) 18:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per this attack on Iryna Harpy's talk page, "From now on your input is pretty much a sack of shite." EdJohnston ( talk) 16:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello.
You may interest this case: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lrednuas Senoroc. I agree with you, there is an obvious sockpuppetry. 46.221.213.142 ( talk) 10:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
@ 92slim:, my current offline copy has "the [[Armenian Genocide]];{{r|Auron04|Schabas00|Moses04|ushmm_Lem|JWW_Lem}}", which content is exactly the same as yours "the [[Armenian Genocide]];<ref name=aur/><ref name=schab/><ref name=moses/><ref name=ushmm/><ref name=jww/>", except for the title of "JWW_Lem" aka "jww" Genocide Background, which is incorrect; it should be Genocide & Mass Atrocities. For "Etymology" I have no idea what you are pointing at. So try to be clear in your assertions and let editors do their job. Carlotm ( talk) 22:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC).
Hello. Just a friendly reminder that the exemption in the 3RR-rules ("Reverting actions performed by banned users in violation of their ban, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users."
) only applies to edits made by verifiably banned users and confirmed sockpuppets. Merely suspecting that someone is a sock isn't a valid reason for reverting all of their edits, and guarantees no exemption from the 3RR-rules since all suspected socks are presumed innocent until found guilty (and often are innocent, judging by CU-results etc at SPI). - Tom |
Thomas.W
talk
14:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. You must observe civility on Wikipedia, including in edit summaries. Thanks. El_C 04:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
04:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC) You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/92slim. Thank you.
Eperoton (
talk)
14:20, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 92slim. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
This is my Talk Page. Please post content disputes in its correspondent article's talk page. Feel free to post any other inquieries here.
![]() |
Hi 92slim! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC) |
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence
Amalek. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Only notifying other editors of a dispute who have the same point of view as your own, as you did
here and
here, is improper "vote stacking" canvassing. If you are going to notify other users of a dispute, you need to either notify people of both points of view or, better, use a
RFC to draw in editors of all persuasions.
TransporterMan (
TALK) 19:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC) PS: Since you're new here, please take the foregoing as just education, not a warning. I'm sure you didn't mean any harm by notifying those editors and in places other than Wikipedia it would have been understandable, fairly normal conduct. No real harm done this time, probably, but you can't do it any more. Regards,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
19:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice. I am only starting to understand how to navigate these shores. -- 92slim ( talk) 03:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Have you read the article ? its nothing new actually, I just cut all the sections about the controversy and pasted them in one place. There is no theories, the article only give you a summary of what happened and the nature of the conflict ! you should read before getting aggressive.
I reverted your edit because we dont need a Wikipedia:Content forking-- Attar-Aram syria ( talk) 14:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately, that is what is been done in that article. Things being deleted and replaced is a way to fork content. -- 92slim ( talk) 14:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Hallo 92slim, thanks for writing! Unfortunately I have at present no time to join the discussion , since I am moving. :-( After having read the contributions, I think that the problem there is about the reliability of the given heterogeneous sources. About that, you could try to post a question to the Reliable sources Noticeboard. Alex2006 ( talk) 08:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
What do you think about merging Malta exiles article with Effort to prosecute Ottoman war criminals? They're both practically the same info. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 07:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't understand what you expect regarding the article. I don't edit regularly here anymore, but as I told you, I am available if you have any questions or worries regarding that article or related topics. What do you mean by "help with the article"? In my opinion, and as I wrote on the talk page, there are no major issues with it, even though the style could be improved here or there. What would your concerns be? In any case, I don't really know who's active these days in that area, I only remember Kober as an editor knowledgeable in Georgian topics and nice to work with. Hope that helps, and please follow up with me if you have more specific questions. Susuman77 ( talk) 22:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
Posts at ANI are archived rather than being deleted so as to ensure that an accurate history of what has happened there is recorded. If you've made a post there and it no longer needs dealing with just mention that its dealt with and someone will close it down. Hope that makes sense. Let me know if you need any further clarification. Amortias ( T)( C) 19:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I want to point out that repeatedly accusing someone of being a sockmaster is a personal attack, even if you add an "alleged" to it. The SPI against Tiptoe did not find him guilty as accused, so drop it. Thomas.W talk 15:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "92slim". The reason given for 92slim's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".
Accept reason: The IP was blocked because it was used while the account was still blocked, but that shouldn't have affected your account once the block on the account ran out. Huon ( talk) 21:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: After this unblock, I took notice that the user (User:Wikimandia) who so avidly requested me being blocked, after vandalizing my talk page, refusing to engage in constructive AfD discussion and showing innapropiate childish behaviour and false edit summaries (hint: WP:GAME) in a WP:POVFORK article was blocked for a week [1]. I guess that is what happens to those who engage in WP:HOUNDING and end up messing the reasonable discussion process along with blatantly false accusations of POV and vandalism. -- 92slim ( talk) 20:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please see my comment on your request at WP:RMTR. — BarrelProof ( talk) 07:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi 92slim. I'm glad that you're trying to get the Hovhannes Kajaznuni article to flow a little better. I came across it and couldn't avoid fixing some of the inelegant phrasing, even though I have no special knowledge of the topic. However, I wanted to bring up a couple of points. First, Wikipedia's style is not to place quoted material in italics, with a few exceptions. The quotation marks on their own make clear that this is quoted text. Also, I see that you say there is no abridged version of Kajaznuni's 1923 report. However, Callender's translation explicitly states on page 8:
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE: Up to this point the words of the author have been translated verbatim in order to give an idea of Mr. Katchaznouni's logical mind and the exposition of the facts that drove him to present his "Manifesto" to his colleagues at the 1923 Convention. From here on, and solely for the sake of brevity, we shall quote excerpts of his arguments which led to his decision as to why the Dashnagtzoutiun, in his opinion, should "decisively end its existence" because "there is no work for the Party."
Can you clarify what you mean when you say there's no abridged version? Thanks. Rupert Clayton ( talk) 22:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
Legal status of polygamy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Edits were on June 26. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
16:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I believe Khojaly should not be included because it is talking about anti-Azerbaijani sentiment in Armenia. Khojaly is not in Armenia. If something happened in Yerevan, Gyumri, or any other territory of Armenia then obviously it should be added but since that city is not in Armenia it should not be added. Ninetoyadome ( talk) 03:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey 92slim,
Would you be able to give me a link where its stated that the Erivan Khanate flag is located in the Museum of the History of Azerbaijan? [2] Thanks much! - LouisAragon ( talk) 21:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Since your previous edits, before your last revert, restored material which was previously removed, with discussion on talk, you have just broken the 1 revert restriction which is in place on the article. I guess you might have forgotten that the article was subject to a 1RR limitation so I'll assume good faith and simply ask you to self revert. Please. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 23:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
I'll also put aside the issue, for the moment, that what you are doing is grossly misrepresenting sources and engaging in POV original research intended to smear a living person which is a violation of WP:BLP. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 23:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.EdJohnston ( talk) 21:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 92slim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello 92slim. All or some of your addition(s) to
Armenian mafia has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 13:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
@ Diannaa: The content you deleted is not copied from hyeforum.com. In fact, it's from a WebArchive of armenianow.com, a secondary source( link here). Perhaps recheck your supposed copyright. -- 92slim ( talk) 16:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Would you mind commenting at User talk:Izno#Polygyny? -- Izno ( talk) 13:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
I have replied to the message you left on my talk page. Please could you respond to my comments there? Thanks, zazpot ( talk) 18:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per this attack on Iryna Harpy's talk page, "From now on your input is pretty much a sack of shite." EdJohnston ( talk) 16:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello.
You may interest this case: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lrednuas Senoroc. I agree with you, there is an obvious sockpuppetry. 46.221.213.142 ( talk) 10:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
@ 92slim:, my current offline copy has "the [[Armenian Genocide]];{{r|Auron04|Schabas00|Moses04|ushmm_Lem|JWW_Lem}}", which content is exactly the same as yours "the [[Armenian Genocide]];<ref name=aur/><ref name=schab/><ref name=moses/><ref name=ushmm/><ref name=jww/>", except for the title of "JWW_Lem" aka "jww" Genocide Background, which is incorrect; it should be Genocide & Mass Atrocities. For "Etymology" I have no idea what you are pointing at. So try to be clear in your assertions and let editors do their job. Carlotm ( talk) 22:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC).
Hello. Just a friendly reminder that the exemption in the 3RR-rules ("Reverting actions performed by banned users in violation of their ban, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users."
) only applies to edits made by verifiably banned users and confirmed sockpuppets. Merely suspecting that someone is a sock isn't a valid reason for reverting all of their edits, and guarantees no exemption from the 3RR-rules since all suspected socks are presumed innocent until found guilty (and often are innocent, judging by CU-results etc at SPI). - Tom |
Thomas.W
talk
14:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. You must observe civility on Wikipedia, including in edit summaries. Thanks. El_C 04:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
04:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC) You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/92slim. Thank you.
Eperoton (
talk)
14:20, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 92slim. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)