Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (89.226.117.72) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --
Darth Mike
(Talk •
Contribs)
10:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as
the edit you made to
Glans penis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Calabe1992 (
talk)
17:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Glans penis with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Calabe1992 (
talk)
17:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
User talk:89.226.117.72, you may be
blocked from editing.
NHRHS2010 the student pilot
✈
17:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from abusing
warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia.
Calabe1992 (
talk)
17:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Glans penis, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
NHRHS2010 the student pilot
✈
17:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calabe1992 ( talk) 17:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Glans penis. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please also note that per WP:BLANKING, deletion of a warning message is considered proof of having read that message. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) ( talk) 17:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 18:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Zad
68
10:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Zad
68
16:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Hello 89.226.117.72, I wanted to inform you that I am returning the image selection at Circumcision to what it was before your proposed change while the image selection RFC is open. You and I both agree that an appropriate image could improve the article, but we do not agree on which is the best image to improve the article, and so we agreed to get input from a wider group of editors. That is why I have opened the RFC and we are already getting comments.
I am assuming good faith here that your intention is to improve the article in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, and that you will be working alongside your fellow editors like myself within the Wikipedia core policy of consensus. Right now at the article talk page, there are three editors who are not on board with the proposal that the image you are suggesting is an improvement to the article: Garycompugeek, Doc James and myself. According to WP:CONSENSUS, which is policy, a lack of consensus to support a proposed change like this means that the proposed change should be undone. This is the reason for my revert. It may be that as a result of the RFC, there will be Wikipedia policy- and guideline-based support for the image, in which case I will abide by consensus. Let's let the RFC run its course before acting on any change.
I am writing this because I can see from your Talk page here that you have run into difficulty working with other editors within Wikipedia, and you have been blocked for it. Please use this as an opportunity to demonstrate that my assumption of good faith is not misplaced in you, and that you now understand how to work with your fellow editors within consensus--if not, there are administrators who can help ensure edit-warring policy is adhered to.
Zad
68
19:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (89.226.117.72) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --
Darth Mike
(Talk •
Contribs)
10:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as
the edit you made to
Glans penis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Calabe1992 (
talk)
17:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Glans penis with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Calabe1992 (
talk)
17:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
User talk:89.226.117.72, you may be
blocked from editing.
NHRHS2010 the student pilot
✈
17:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from abusing
warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the
user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia.
Calabe1992 (
talk)
17:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Glans penis, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
NHRHS2010 the student pilot
✈
17:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Calabe1992 ( talk) 17:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Glans penis. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please also note that per WP:BLANKING, deletion of a warning message is considered proof of having read that message. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) ( talk) 17:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 18:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Zad
68
10:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Zad
68
16:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Hello 89.226.117.72, I wanted to inform you that I am returning the image selection at Circumcision to what it was before your proposed change while the image selection RFC is open. You and I both agree that an appropriate image could improve the article, but we do not agree on which is the best image to improve the article, and so we agreed to get input from a wider group of editors. That is why I have opened the RFC and we are already getting comments.
I am assuming good faith here that your intention is to improve the article in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, and that you will be working alongside your fellow editors like myself within the Wikipedia core policy of consensus. Right now at the article talk page, there are three editors who are not on board with the proposal that the image you are suggesting is an improvement to the article: Garycompugeek, Doc James and myself. According to WP:CONSENSUS, which is policy, a lack of consensus to support a proposed change like this means that the proposed change should be undone. This is the reason for my revert. It may be that as a result of the RFC, there will be Wikipedia policy- and guideline-based support for the image, in which case I will abide by consensus. Let's let the RFC run its course before acting on any change.
I am writing this because I can see from your Talk page here that you have run into difficulty working with other editors within Wikipedia, and you have been blocked for it. Please use this as an opportunity to demonstrate that my assumption of good faith is not misplaced in you, and that you now understand how to work with your fellow editors within consensus--if not, there are administrators who can help ensure edit-warring policy is adhered to.
Zad
68
19:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |