From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 88.110.119.210, has made edits to Kingdom of Strathclyde that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Drmies ( talk) 02:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Oh, you're "Pretty sure", aren't you. Listen, that "autistic bitch" shit, how did you think that was going to end? For years you have been desperately trying to get your little race-oriented edits into Wikipedia articles--and yet you're gonna go around acting like a complete dick and getting blocked immediately. Are you just trying to get blocked? Because you are succeeding very well. Drmies ( talk) 02:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

October 2022

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Drmies ( talk) 02:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

88.110.119.210 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Lol, couldn't give a flying fck. I'll just keep coming back and back and back. What 'race obsessed' edits, lmao? I couldn't give a damn about race, it's ridiculous and archaeogenetics proves it. We all trace back to the same Sub-Saharan African population a few hundred thousand years ago and share 99.9% of our genetic code. Which makes the idea of a 'Celtic people' all the more absurd and ridiculous considering almost every single 'Celtic person' today speaks a Germanic language as their mothertongue (and usually only tongue) and that they descend from the exact same Bronze Age mix of peoples as other Germanic-speaking populations of Europe do (in addition to overlapping and overclustering with them genetically). Ergo, they are Germanic. R1b-L21 is merely an arbitrary subclade of Y-DNA. Every single living human male on Earth is merely a subclade of Haplogroup A. It's not ME who has a problem with that reality. It's not ME who has a problem with the concept of an ethnolinguistic group. It's editors like merry Mutt Lunker that has a rabid inability to accept that you can group peoples who speak Germanic languages together in the present in the exact same way you can group peoples who speak Slavic or Italic or Bantu or any other kind of languages together. 88.110.119.210 ( talk) 05:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Since you intend to disrespect Wikipedia policies by evading your (short) block, there is nothing to discuss here. 331dot ( talk) 08:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

88.110.119.210 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Okay, do you want to try explaining why my edits to the Gaels talkpage was 'trolling', exactly? To simply point out that Gaels did not have a distinct ancestral descent to neighboring European peoples and overlap and overcluster with them genetically? And that the only reason Gaels ever existed as an observably distinct and unique ethnic group was due to the Proto-Indo-European language eventually corrupting into something distinct in Gaelic? How is pointing out a simple genetic fact 'trolling'? 88.110.119.210 ( talk) 23:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 10:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 88.110.119.210, has made edits to Kingdom of Strathclyde that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Drmies ( talk) 02:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Oh, you're "Pretty sure", aren't you. Listen, that "autistic bitch" shit, how did you think that was going to end? For years you have been desperately trying to get your little race-oriented edits into Wikipedia articles--and yet you're gonna go around acting like a complete dick and getting blocked immediately. Are you just trying to get blocked? Because you are succeeding very well. Drmies ( talk) 02:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

October 2022

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Drmies ( talk) 02:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

88.110.119.210 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Lol, couldn't give a flying fck. I'll just keep coming back and back and back. What 'race obsessed' edits, lmao? I couldn't give a damn about race, it's ridiculous and archaeogenetics proves it. We all trace back to the same Sub-Saharan African population a few hundred thousand years ago and share 99.9% of our genetic code. Which makes the idea of a 'Celtic people' all the more absurd and ridiculous considering almost every single 'Celtic person' today speaks a Germanic language as their mothertongue (and usually only tongue) and that they descend from the exact same Bronze Age mix of peoples as other Germanic-speaking populations of Europe do (in addition to overlapping and overclustering with them genetically). Ergo, they are Germanic. R1b-L21 is merely an arbitrary subclade of Y-DNA. Every single living human male on Earth is merely a subclade of Haplogroup A. It's not ME who has a problem with that reality. It's not ME who has a problem with the concept of an ethnolinguistic group. It's editors like merry Mutt Lunker that has a rabid inability to accept that you can group peoples who speak Germanic languages together in the present in the exact same way you can group peoples who speak Slavic or Italic or Bantu or any other kind of languages together. 88.110.119.210 ( talk) 05:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Since you intend to disrespect Wikipedia policies by evading your (short) block, there is nothing to discuss here. 331dot ( talk) 08:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

88.110.119.210 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Okay, do you want to try explaining why my edits to the Gaels talkpage was 'trolling', exactly? To simply point out that Gaels did not have a distinct ancestral descent to neighboring European peoples and overlap and overcluster with them genetically? And that the only reason Gaels ever existed as an observably distinct and unique ethnic group was due to the Proto-Indo-European language eventually corrupting into something distinct in Gaelic? How is pointing out a simple genetic fact 'trolling'? 88.110.119.210 ( talk) 23:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 10:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook