I noticed you disagree with using an image of a Sako TRG-22 rifle chambered in .308 Winchester used for hunting in the Sako TRG article. The image depicts an example of non military use of such a rifle.
Why do you think using the WikiCommons image is inappropriate in the Sako TRG article? -- Francis Flinch ( talk) 11:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Bmf 051. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Made in Europe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bmf 051 ( talk) 19:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. An edit that you recently made to TeenSet seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! (CC) Tbhotch ^™ 19:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hardbass; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet ( talk) 18:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Boud. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to October 2020 Polish protests have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. This edit and this edit by someone using your IP address introducing fringe science, self-contradictory terminology were not constructive for the building of an encyclopedia. Boud ( talk) 14:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at October 2020 Polish protests. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Blablubbs ^{( talk • contribs)} 16:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including edit-warring, editing to promote a point of view, editing contrary to cited sources, deliberately changing the wording of quoted text to make it say something other than what the quoted person actually said, etc. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.