Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Ionian Sea. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Dr.
K. 19:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Epirus— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Dan Koehl (
talk) 16:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, How doesn't a german historic map of the time appear to be constructive? What edits shall I do to that? Thank you
I am re-asking, A german\french map of the same period, showing the demographics of the time, HOW IS THIS NOT CONSTRUCTIVE????!!! What the hell is wrong with everyone?? Gosh!
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Ionian Sea. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Dr.
K. 17:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Ionian Sea. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 17:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Epameinondas Charisiadis.
Dr.
K. 17:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
You Nationalistic retards, who the heck do you think you are to tell me you will be blocked?? Who deleted sourced content?? I can also write about Greece and cite an article about maths, and a greek editor might revert it, this does not mean that he is deleting SOURCED content you retards. I am removing it for th elast time as it is malsourced and it does not state anything anywhere in the source about what was written there. If you block me, this will have legal consequences and we will see who will have to pay for reparations. Just try and let;s see. Cheers
Moreover, if you keep on lying, I am going to block you from editing. The etymology in Albanian had a source, whether the gayreeks, sorry greeks like it or not. IT will be quotes AND AS LONG AS IT STATES AN ACADEMIC SOURCE IT STAYS THERE WITHOUT ANY DOUBT, AND NORTHEN EPIRUS GOES DUE TO MALCITATION. TRY AND BLOCK ME AND YOU WILL SEE.THAT IS ALL I GOT TO SAY. CHEERS
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Luk
talk 17:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Katie
talk 21:32, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Ionian Sea. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Dr.
K. 19:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Epirus— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Dan Koehl (
talk) 16:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, How doesn't a german historic map of the time appear to be constructive? What edits shall I do to that? Thank you
I am re-asking, A german\french map of the same period, showing the demographics of the time, HOW IS THIS NOT CONSTRUCTIVE????!!! What the hell is wrong with everyone?? Gosh!
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Ionian Sea. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Dr.
K. 17:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Ionian Sea. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 17:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Epameinondas Charisiadis.
Dr.
K. 17:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
You Nationalistic retards, who the heck do you think you are to tell me you will be blocked?? Who deleted sourced content?? I can also write about Greece and cite an article about maths, and a greek editor might revert it, this does not mean that he is deleting SOURCED content you retards. I am removing it for th elast time as it is malsourced and it does not state anything anywhere in the source about what was written there. If you block me, this will have legal consequences and we will see who will have to pay for reparations. Just try and let;s see. Cheers
Moreover, if you keep on lying, I am going to block you from editing. The etymology in Albanian had a source, whether the gayreeks, sorry greeks like it or not. IT will be quotes AND AS LONG AS IT STATES AN ACADEMIC SOURCE IT STAYS THERE WITHOUT ANY DOUBT, AND NORTHEN EPIRUS GOES DUE TO MALCITATION. TRY AND BLOCK ME AND YOU WILL SEE.THAT IS ALL I GOT TO SAY. CHEERS
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
Luk
talk 17:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Katie
talk 21:32, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |