The next time you forum shop, I will block you. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

See WP:TRUTH. Work out the dispute on the talk page and stop spamming noticeboards. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

So wikipedia is actually schauvinist shit careless not only whether what's here is actually true but also what's actually in sources present even on wikipedia.-- 83.10.5.144 ( talk) 02:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User talk:NeilN— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

You've made a mistake because wikipedia is actually schauvinist shit careless not only whether what's here is actually true but also what's actually in sources present even on wikipedia.-- 83.10.5.144 ( talk) 02:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Any further personal attacks ^[1] and you will be blocked from editing. El_C 02:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.