Hello, I'm
Me Da Wikipedian. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Ruskin Museum without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Me Da Wikipedian (
talk) 15:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
Bluebird K7. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article.
Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.
-REDACTED403
(talk) 12:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
re Bluebird K7 again.
Please keep the editorialising out of the article page. Use the talk: page if you must, but also see WP:NPA. This is particularly unimpressive when you're making substantial, but unsubstantiated, accusations about an editor who's easily personally identifiable, but you yourself have chosen to remain anonymous. You are of course welcome to edit here as an IP-only editor, but it's not a good look to then start making things quite so personal. Andy Dingley ( talk) 19:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JeffSpaceman ( talk) 21:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Bluebird K7, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Adakiko (
talk) 18:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Bluebird K7. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Joyous!
Noise! 17:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
Bluebird K7. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article.
Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.
Joyous!
Noise! 17:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
The edit you're adding does not belong in the article itself. Please either take the problem to the talk page of the article, or, if you really think the article shouldn't be included in Wikipedia, start an formal deletion discussion. Joyous! Noise! 17:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Bluebird K7 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Your repeated change, here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bluebird_K7&diff=prev&oldid=1223773566 is breaking the wikilink to the
Donald Campbell page and is also against our style guide for the use of names. Please stop changing this.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 08:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at
Bluebird K7, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 16:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Bluebird K7, you may be
blocked from editing.
Wiiformii (
talk) 14:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary, as you did at
Bluebird K7. Why is this reference being removed?
Wiiformii (
talk) 14:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 10:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello, I'm
Me Da Wikipedian. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Ruskin Museum without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Me Da Wikipedian (
talk) 15:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
Bluebird K7. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article.
Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.
-REDACTED403
(talk) 12:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
re Bluebird K7 again.
Please keep the editorialising out of the article page. Use the talk: page if you must, but also see WP:NPA. This is particularly unimpressive when you're making substantial, but unsubstantiated, accusations about an editor who's easily personally identifiable, but you yourself have chosen to remain anonymous. You are of course welcome to edit here as an IP-only editor, but it's not a good look to then start making things quite so personal. Andy Dingley ( talk) 19:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JeffSpaceman ( talk) 21:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Bluebird K7, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Adakiko (
talk) 18:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Bluebird K7. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Joyous!
Noise! 17:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article,
Bluebird K7. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article.
Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.
Joyous!
Noise! 17:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
The edit you're adding does not belong in the article itself. Please either take the problem to the talk page of the article, or, if you really think the article shouldn't be included in Wikipedia, start an formal deletion discussion. Joyous! Noise! 17:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Bluebird K7 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Your repeated change, here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bluebird_K7&diff=prev&oldid=1223773566 is breaking the wikilink to the
Donald Campbell page and is also against our style guide for the use of names. Please stop changing this.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 08:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at
Bluebird K7, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 16:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Bluebird K7, you may be
blocked from editing.
Wiiformii (
talk) 14:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary, as you did at
Bluebird K7. Why is this reference being removed?
Wiiformii (
talk) 14:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Andy Dingley (
talk) 10:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |