Please do not add or change content, as you did at Walmart, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Walmart. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Multinational corporation. - Mlpearc ( open channel) 01:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because your changes broke the formatting for the article. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Stesmo ( talk) 02:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. I reverted your edit to Royal Proclamation of 1763‎ partly because Aboriginals is a disambiguation page, not an article; and partly because the First Nations of Canada were directly affected by the Proclamation. In other words, the text did not need to be changed. Haploidavey ( talk) 12:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Crowsnest Pass, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 ( talk) 02:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to First Nations in Alberta has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: First Nations in Alberta was changed by 70.77.124.67 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857894 on 2017-06-03T13:21:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 13:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at First Nations in Alberta. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Widr ( talk) 14:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please note that the word "aboriginal" does not replace the phrase "First Nations". "Aboriginal" is an umbrella term that's used when the context is "First Nations and Inuit and Métis" — and even then, it's a term that's phasing out in favour of "indigenous" instead — but when First Nations are being referred to alone, and Inuit or Métis are not being covered, then the correct term remains "First Nations" rather than "aboriginal" or "indigenous". Bearcat ( talk) 16:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Final warning: if you keep making similar changes, like you did at Joni Mitchell, you may be blocked. Graham 87 07:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC) reply