Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wjemather please leave a message... 17:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Big Three (tennis), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. You have been told to stop blanking the page and removing big four content. Other articles are linked to the big for content. The lead is one thing but the rest is not
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
17:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Big Three (tennis) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wjemather please leave a message... 18:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Three (tennis), you may be blocked from editing. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 22:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:64.190.226.125 reported by User:Fyunck(click) (Result: ). You may be able to avoid problems by self-reverting asap. Thank you.
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
06:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Big Three (tennis) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wjemather please leave a message... 22:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Big Three (tennis), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You only just got off a block for the same thing! And you're back at it? Do you want to get blocked for a month or more? Please stop removing content.
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
03:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Big Three (tennis), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. If you boldly remove content and it gets reverted, you do not revert again. You bring it to talk to convince others that your edit is better. You don't seem to understand how wikipedia works.
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
03:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wjemather please leave a message... 17:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Big Three (tennis), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. You have been told to stop blanking the page and removing big four content. Other articles are linked to the big for content. The lead is one thing but the rest is not
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
17:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Big Three (tennis) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wjemather please leave a message... 18:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Three (tennis), you may be blocked from editing. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 22:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:64.190.226.125 reported by User:Fyunck(click) (Result: ). You may be able to avoid problems by self-reverting asap. Thank you.
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
06:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Big Three (tennis) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wjemather please leave a message... 22:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Big Three (tennis), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You only just got off a block for the same thing! And you're back at it? Do you want to get blocked for a month or more? Please stop removing content.
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
03:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Big Three (tennis), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. If you boldly remove content and it gets reverted, you do not revert again. You bring it to talk to convince others that your edit is better. You don't seem to understand how wikipedia works.
Fyunck(click) (
talk)
03:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |