![]() | Attention:
This WHOIS report. . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in theIf you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Xerostomia worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Thank you.
JForget
21:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Xerostomia constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you.
5 albert square (
talk)
21:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
-- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 02:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at
Tavis Smiley, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
SummerPhD (
talk)
20:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on other people again, as you did at
Talk:Nostradamus, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. In
this diff, you directly attack another editor, make false claims, and are generally insulting.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
07:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
08:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
Talk:Nostradamus. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. —
Jeraphine Gryphon (
talk)
00:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Alexf
(talk)
01:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Baseball's Last Hero: The Roberto Clemente Story, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 14:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Nostradamus. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
TF92 (
talk)
23:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Janis Joplin.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime ( open channel) 21:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
You erased my words from this very page. It is my "User talk" page. I clicked "submit" so I could defend myself. The submission did not go through because you blocked it. That means you are violating a Wikipedia rule. You are not allowed to mess with someone's "User talk" page. Please stop.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:64.183.42.25 reported by User:FlightTime (Result: ). Thank you. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
22:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
You erased my words from this very page. It is my "User talk" page. I clicked "submit" so I could defend myself. I tried to direct your attention to errors in Janis Joplin's "Sexuality and relationships" section. Your actions are condoning those errors. My submission here did not go through because you blocked it. That means you are violating a Wikipedia rule. You are not allowed to mess with someone's "User talk" page.
I've given FlightTime a bollocking for harrassing you and others, that should suffice. Regarding this revert, removing a citation to the Washington Post and Times Herald written by Carl Bernstein praising the post-Big Brother group under the grounds of "not notable" shows a complete and utter lack of understanding of what writing an encyclopedia is. Notability is about the suitability for a standalone article; the correct policy here is verifiability (can you back the quote up to show it's true?) and due weight (is it of sufficient importance in the article overall to mention). Anyway, I've put the quotation back, but trimmed a bit. This online Washington Post source cross references the Bernstein piece, with the summary "Simply, an evening with Janis Joplin is a party and a romp". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
![]() | Attention:
This WHOIS report. . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in theIf you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Xerostomia worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Thank you.
JForget
21:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Xerostomia constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you.
5 albert square (
talk)
21:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
-- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 02:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at
Tavis Smiley, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
SummerPhD (
talk)
20:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on other people again, as you did at
Talk:Nostradamus, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. In
this diff, you directly attack another editor, make false claims, and are generally insulting.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
07:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Qwyrxian (
talk)
08:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
Talk:Nostradamus. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. —
Jeraphine Gryphon (
talk)
00:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Alexf
(talk)
01:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Baseball's Last Hero: The Roberto Clemente Story, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 14:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Nostradamus. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
TF92 (
talk)
23:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop
making disruptive edits, as you did at
Janis Joplin.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime ( open channel) 21:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
You erased my words from this very page. It is my "User talk" page. I clicked "submit" so I could defend myself. The submission did not go through because you blocked it. That means you are violating a Wikipedia rule. You are not allowed to mess with someone's "User talk" page. Please stop.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:64.183.42.25 reported by User:FlightTime (Result: ). Thank you. -
FlightTime (
open channel)
22:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
You erased my words from this very page. It is my "User talk" page. I clicked "submit" so I could defend myself. I tried to direct your attention to errors in Janis Joplin's "Sexuality and relationships" section. Your actions are condoning those errors. My submission here did not go through because you blocked it. That means you are violating a Wikipedia rule. You are not allowed to mess with someone's "User talk" page.
I've given FlightTime a bollocking for harrassing you and others, that should suffice. Regarding this revert, removing a citation to the Washington Post and Times Herald written by Carl Bernstein praising the post-Big Brother group under the grounds of "not notable" shows a complete and utter lack of understanding of what writing an encyclopedia is. Notability is about the suitability for a standalone article; the correct policy here is verifiability (can you back the quote up to show it's true?) and due weight (is it of sufficient importance in the article overall to mention). Anyway, I've put the quotation back, but trimmed a bit. This online Washington Post source cross references the Bernstein piece, with the summary "Simply, an evening with Janis Joplin is a party and a romp". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |