Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. through which multiple users may connect to the InternetTo have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed,
administrators should consider a
soft block using
Template:Anonblock. If you are
autoblocked repeatedly, contact your
Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact
Wikimedia's
XFF project about enabling
X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its
proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
![]() |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Robert Brown (botanist), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
13:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
03:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
DZRH. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Markoolio97 (
talk)
05:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
2019 in the Philippines, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Movies Time (
talk)
12:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rizal Park. Please STOP adding unsourced material and refrain from persistent disruptive edits. You will be reported to admins. I hope that you can respect the policies on Wikipedia.
WikiAviator (
talk)
13:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
N.J.A. |
talk
14:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Dobol B sa News TV. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Movies Time ( talk) 13:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
EDSA (road) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
00:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
FriendlyCaribou. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Timeline of the 21st century—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
FriendlyCaribou (
talk)
13:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Super Balita sa Umaga Nationwide, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
17:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
Timeline of the 21st century, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
~Nick~
{talk}
15:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
List of political scandals in the Philippines, you may be
blocked from editing.
TheImaCow (
talk)
06:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
2019 into
Timeline of the 21st century. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
12:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 21st century shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MarkH21 talk 06:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MarkH21. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Timeline of the 21st century without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
MarkH21
talk
06:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
I dream of horses. I noticed that in
this edit to
List of political scandals in the Philippines, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
I dream of horses
(t)
(c) Remember to {{
ping}} me after replying off my
talk page
05:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Timeline of the 21st century. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. You've been told several times by
Serendipodous about your continued mass additions of Philippines-specific content to lists intended for globally significant events. —
MarkH21
talk
20:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the 21st century, you may be blocked from editing. — MarkH21 talk 14:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:58.71.120.251 reported by User:MarkH21 (Result: ). Thank you. —
MarkH21
talk
19:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yaysmay15/Archive and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Yaysmay15. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
58.71.120.251 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Editing on 2020 in the Philippines, Timeline of 21st Century and others and shorting the longest block on June 2021
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 12:50, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You must not do so again. -- Yamla ( talk) 12:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. through which multiple users may connect to the InternetTo have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed,
administrators should consider a
soft block using
Template:Anonblock. If you are
autoblocked repeatedly, contact your
Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact
Wikimedia's
XFF project about enabling
X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its
proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
![]() |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Robert Brown (botanist), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
13:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC){{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jauerback
dude?/
dude.
03:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
DZRH. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Markoolio97 (
talk)
05:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
2019 in the Philippines, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Movies Time (
talk)
12:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rizal Park. Please STOP adding unsourced material and refrain from persistent disruptive edits. You will be reported to admins. I hope that you can respect the policies on Wikipedia.
WikiAviator (
talk)
13:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
N.J.A. |
talk
14:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Dobol B sa News TV. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Movies Time ( talk) 13:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Your addition to
EDSA (road) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
00:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
FriendlyCaribou. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Timeline of the 21st century—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
FriendlyCaribou (
talk)
13:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Super Balita sa Umaga Nationwide, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
17:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
Timeline of the 21st century, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
~Nick~
{talk}
15:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
List of political scandals in the Philippines, you may be
blocked from editing.
TheImaCow (
talk)
06:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
2019 into
Timeline of the 21st century. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
12:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 21st century shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MarkH21 talk 06:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MarkH21. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Timeline of the 21st century without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
MarkH21
talk
06:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
I dream of horses. I noticed that in
this edit to
List of political scandals in the Philippines, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
I dream of horses
(t)
(c) Remember to {{
ping}} me after replying off my
talk page
05:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Timeline of the 21st century. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. You've been told several times by
Serendipodous about your continued mass additions of Philippines-specific content to lists intended for globally significant events. —
MarkH21
talk
20:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the 21st century, you may be blocked from editing. — MarkH21 talk 14:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:58.71.120.251 reported by User:MarkH21 (Result: ). Thank you. —
MarkH21
talk
19:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yaysmay15/Archive and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Yaysmay15. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
58.71.120.251 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Editing on 2020 in the Philippines, Timeline of 21st Century and others and shorting the longest block on June 2021
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 12:50, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You must not do so again. -- Yamla ( talk) 12:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |