Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Ham and cheese sandwich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello, I'm
John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Expo 2020, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
John Cline (
talk)
08:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Anbe Sivam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
K6ka (
talk)
02:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see
the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
13:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Audisankara College of Engineering & Technology. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators can
block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you.
Philip Trueman (
talk)
01:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Twsx. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Mike Jackson, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. ~ |
twsx |
talk
cont | ~
14:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Karuneegar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding unsourced material. All material added, especially contentious material, must have a reliable source. Please see
WP:RS. Further unsourced additions can result in being blocked.
Bgwhite (
talk)
09:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
The entire content of the article Karuneegar was completely unsourced. We do not accept original research. You need to follow our policies on reliable sources, please read WP:RS. Such websites, like the one you have cited, promoted by the community itself, is not considered as reliable, you have to look for text references, and that too reliable ones. For example, if you go through the article on Kayastha, you will find that each and every statement is reliably sourced and the references are categorically mentioned. Its not just me, any other editor reviewing the page, or any administrator will again remove all such statements, if these are incorporated without citing valid references. Like User:Qwyrxian had done before. Therefore, if you actually want to improve the article, find proper sources (not a website on Karuneegar, which is nothing but WP:OR) and discuss the statements you wish to incorporate, along with valid references. Thanks. Ekdalian ( talk) 04:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
East Kilbride with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
Lugia2453 (
talk)
20:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
East Kilbride with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Lugia2453 (
talk)
20:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
East Kilbride.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
20:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Qatar. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators can
block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize.
Widr (
talk)
15:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
List of people claimed to possess an eidetic memory has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
List of people claimed to possess an eidetic memory was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.facebook.com/gayatrikhasiram) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
14:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Gilliam (
talk)
15:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
So, to sum this up: five edits in five months (that's 1 edit/month) that have largely consisted in providing information that "didn't appear constructive" to another editor (that's one to chalk against WP:POV) and one unsourced citation, and you block an entire dynamic IP that is shared by thousands of machines?
The level of human stupidity will never cease to amaze me... 54.240.197.233 ( talk) 16:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Public, West Bromwich. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators can
block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you.
Gilliam (
talk)
09:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lough Mahon may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
List of child prodigies because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Materialscientist (
talk)
11:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Luxembourg (city), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
14:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Fucking killjoy.
Hi, I'm Ivy John. I recently undid one of your edits to Cyril because it seemed unconstructive and offensive. If you disagree, please take these steps:
-Don't be offended. I didn't undo your edit out of spite, and wish in no way to insult you.
-Don't revise the edit. That is
Edit Warring, and could get us both in trouble. Instead,
-Discuss it on
My Talk Page. If I made a mistake, I'll own up to it, but you have to point it out, or I'll think I was right.
Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvyJohn ( talk • contribs) 11:54, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Vikas Swarup may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Henrique Hilário, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Geoff
Who, me?
12:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Waggers. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Template:Cork Harbour, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Waggers
TALK
09:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Ricky Martin. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
buff
bills
7701
02:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Suman Chakraborty, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Jeppiz (
talk)
01:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia.
Jeppiz (
talk)
01:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Ra's al Ghul. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
14:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
Adolphe Sax , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Garg has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ilyushka88. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Sandfields, Port Talbot— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Ilyushka88 |
Talk!
Contribs
21:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Ham and cheese sandwich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello, I'm
John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Expo 2020, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
John Cline (
talk)
08:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Anbe Sivam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
K6ka (
talk)
02:51, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see
the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
13:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Audisankara College of Engineering & Technology. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators can
block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you.
Philip Trueman (
talk)
01:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Twsx. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Mike Jackson, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. ~ |
twsx |
talk
cont | ~
14:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Karuneegar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop adding unsourced material. All material added, especially contentious material, must have a reliable source. Please see
WP:RS. Further unsourced additions can result in being blocked.
Bgwhite (
talk)
09:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
The entire content of the article Karuneegar was completely unsourced. We do not accept original research. You need to follow our policies on reliable sources, please read WP:RS. Such websites, like the one you have cited, promoted by the community itself, is not considered as reliable, you have to look for text references, and that too reliable ones. For example, if you go through the article on Kayastha, you will find that each and every statement is reliably sourced and the references are categorically mentioned. Its not just me, any other editor reviewing the page, or any administrator will again remove all such statements, if these are incorporated without citing valid references. Like User:Qwyrxian had done before. Therefore, if you actually want to improve the article, find proper sources (not a website on Karuneegar, which is nothing but WP:OR) and discuss the statements you wish to incorporate, along with valid references. Thanks. Ekdalian ( talk) 04:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
East Kilbride with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
Lugia2453 (
talk)
20:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
East Kilbride with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Lugia2453 (
talk)
20:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
East Kilbride.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
20:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Qatar. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators can
block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize.
Widr (
talk)
15:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
List of people claimed to possess an eidetic memory has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
List of people claimed to possess an eidetic memory was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.facebook.com/gayatrikhasiram) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
14:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Gilliam (
talk)
15:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
So, to sum this up: five edits in five months (that's 1 edit/month) that have largely consisted in providing information that "didn't appear constructive" to another editor (that's one to chalk against WP:POV) and one unsourced citation, and you block an entire dynamic IP that is shared by thousands of machines?
The level of human stupidity will never cease to amaze me... 54.240.197.233 ( talk) 16:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Public, West Bromwich. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators can
block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you.
Gilliam (
talk)
09:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lough Mahon may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
List of child prodigies because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Materialscientist (
talk)
11:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Luxembourg (city), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
IronGargoyle (
talk)
14:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Fucking killjoy.
Hi, I'm Ivy John. I recently undid one of your edits to Cyril because it seemed unconstructive and offensive. If you disagree, please take these steps:
-Don't be offended. I didn't undo your edit out of spite, and wish in no way to insult you.
-Don't revise the edit. That is
Edit Warring, and could get us both in trouble. Instead,
-Discuss it on
My Talk Page. If I made a mistake, I'll own up to it, but you have to point it out, or I'll think I was right.
Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IvyJohn ( talk • contribs) 11:54, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Vikas Swarup may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Henrique Hilário, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Geoff
Who, me?
12:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Waggers. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Template:Cork Harbour, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Waggers
TALK
09:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Ricky Martin. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
buff
bills
7701
02:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Suman Chakraborty, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Jeppiz (
talk)
01:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia.
Jeppiz (
talk)
01:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Ra's al Ghul. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
14:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
Adolphe Sax , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
03:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Garg has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Materialscientist (
talk)
08:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ilyushka88. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Sandfields, Port Talbot— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Ilyushka88 |
Talk!
Contribs
21:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |