Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bolivia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 08:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Can you tell me WHY THIS HAPPENS? yOU EDIT THE PAGE AND THEN CLICK PUBLISH, and the resulting edits are VERY DIFFERENT.I don't want to point fingers but part of me thinks i;m being framed as I find it hard to believe that wiki editing has such juvenlie bugs in which you make edits, and it comes out not the same. But this is a first for me but it wasA NOT MY FAULT AT ALL. 49.180.129.245 ( talk) 08:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Materialscientist, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot ( talk) 08:51, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
And I did not revert his mistakes only "seconds" afterwards. I had allowed Materialscientists 1 whole hour before I FINALLY gave up on him and went on and fixed his mistakes of practically deleting a lot of info, when nobody else was reverting his destructive edits. Why couldn't he have reverted back one edit - why ALL OF MY EDITS? there seems to be no valid reasoning behind such excessive actions.
Also this isn't hardly even the first time I bumped heads with Material scientists and disputed against him around 2 years ago. I was an anonymous IP user in sydney and added real info with real sources to an article that was also political. Then without any reasoning, I receive a message shortly from him saying that my IP address has been banned and accused me of making edits that I did not even make. It seems arbitrary and unfair.
But here I took the time to reach out to him in his own talk page today, but he did not at all revert his mistakes after almost an hour of us discussing it here on this page, and me having informed him that my one-off bad edit was just a minor misunderstanding. And he did not have to delete ALL my other edits as that was wrongful. And also Grammarly did not make any mistakes. As materialscientist had explained, from his experience - sometimes unintentional errors do occur when using the visual editing Wikipedia interface. I assumed that was probably the case on what happened there. 49.180.129.245 ( talk) 12:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Not like I am afraid since I know what this is. Tn terms of edit-warring, Crmoorhead is actually the person who has been deleting real information from the bolivia page and making up biased reasoning. He is the one that needs to be banned given his past actions. If you look at his contributions, he has an obvious vendetta against Morales and been deleting info that is positive about morales or supports the fact that OAS has not been wrongful on him. Look at his edits and then look at mine. Nobody can deny that he wais the ONLY one in the wrong for deleting such info and I am the ONLY editor to stand up to vandals on that page but I also understand bolivia is a political topic where people are not partial. And wants to silence others.
But Look at the info he deletes. The info is solid and has solid sources. Yet he deletes them using flawed reasons but I undelete it. So judge for yourself if such info is warranted to be deleted or not.
He is only deleting because he hates that info and most of his edits have been removing positive info about Morales and that's why he should be banned. Not me since I'm the one protecting the page from people wanting to hide information and delete it pettily.
His - (deleting info with fake or non-genuine reasoning) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985021134 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985018054 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985014684
mine - (undeleting his edits using solid sources and reminding him to go to the talk page and discuss if he wants to talk it out)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985019968 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985024701 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985024701 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985023721 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985025230
Any "impartial" observer can CHECK THE links above and know that I am the one who has been correcting edits of bad faith and opposing people deleting info that is well backed by sources. He tried to make up phony reasons but I was the one reminding him that the info is backed by solid sources and telling him to take it to the talk page if he disagrees. I was about to report him for edit warring but decided it was not worth the energy. But of course, there will always be people wanting to delete info and not be happy for me to correct them.
And I'm not afraid since the majority of my edits were in good faith and the person in that admin message board - Crmoorhead -Is the very person who should be banned for excessive bad faith editing and vandalism if you do check the bolivia page of the past 24 hours. If anything, I am the only honest editor not willing to let bad faith editors delete REAL info from Bolivia page but I also understand that there are people like Crmoorhead who really wants to remove me since he knows that the facts are on my side and editors like me keeps the page honest.
Also, I like to formally report Crmoorhead for his own vast vandalism on bolivia's page and using false reasoning that looks proper but are just untrue if people were to really study it, and he is effectively deleting large amounts of info from the bolivia page that he simply dislikes. And that isn't right. Unlike him, I have not deleted any information from that page that is well backed by sources but rescued them. He realizes that he can't delete my edits as they are backed by strong sources so he makes an arbitrary case against me despite he is the one who should be banned for deleting info and my real crime was to oppose him on that. I'm not naive about his motivations and welcome a fair and thorough investigation to the both of us.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985016572
49.180.129.245 ( talk) 06:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bolivia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 08:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Can you tell me WHY THIS HAPPENS? yOU EDIT THE PAGE AND THEN CLICK PUBLISH, and the resulting edits are VERY DIFFERENT.I don't want to point fingers but part of me thinks i;m being framed as I find it hard to believe that wiki editing has such juvenlie bugs in which you make edits, and it comes out not the same. But this is a first for me but it wasA NOT MY FAULT AT ALL. 49.180.129.245 ( talk) 08:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Materialscientist, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot ( talk) 08:51, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
And I did not revert his mistakes only "seconds" afterwards. I had allowed Materialscientists 1 whole hour before I FINALLY gave up on him and went on and fixed his mistakes of practically deleting a lot of info, when nobody else was reverting his destructive edits. Why couldn't he have reverted back one edit - why ALL OF MY EDITS? there seems to be no valid reasoning behind such excessive actions.
Also this isn't hardly even the first time I bumped heads with Material scientists and disputed against him around 2 years ago. I was an anonymous IP user in sydney and added real info with real sources to an article that was also political. Then without any reasoning, I receive a message shortly from him saying that my IP address has been banned and accused me of making edits that I did not even make. It seems arbitrary and unfair.
But here I took the time to reach out to him in his own talk page today, but he did not at all revert his mistakes after almost an hour of us discussing it here on this page, and me having informed him that my one-off bad edit was just a minor misunderstanding. And he did not have to delete ALL my other edits as that was wrongful. And also Grammarly did not make any mistakes. As materialscientist had explained, from his experience - sometimes unintentional errors do occur when using the visual editing Wikipedia interface. I assumed that was probably the case on what happened there. 49.180.129.245 ( talk) 12:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Not like I am afraid since I know what this is. Tn terms of edit-warring, Crmoorhead is actually the person who has been deleting real information from the bolivia page and making up biased reasoning. He is the one that needs to be banned given his past actions. If you look at his contributions, he has an obvious vendetta against Morales and been deleting info that is positive about morales or supports the fact that OAS has not been wrongful on him. Look at his edits and then look at mine. Nobody can deny that he wais the ONLY one in the wrong for deleting such info and I am the ONLY editor to stand up to vandals on that page but I also understand bolivia is a political topic where people are not partial. And wants to silence others.
But Look at the info he deletes. The info is solid and has solid sources. Yet he deletes them using flawed reasons but I undelete it. So judge for yourself if such info is warranted to be deleted or not.
He is only deleting because he hates that info and most of his edits have been removing positive info about Morales and that's why he should be banned. Not me since I'm the one protecting the page from people wanting to hide information and delete it pettily.
His - (deleting info with fake or non-genuine reasoning) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985021134 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985018054 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985014684
mine - (undeleting his edits using solid sources and reminding him to go to the talk page and discuss if he wants to talk it out)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985019968 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985024701 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985024701 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985023721 + https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985025230
Any "impartial" observer can CHECK THE links above and know that I am the one who has been correcting edits of bad faith and opposing people deleting info that is well backed by sources. He tried to make up phony reasons but I was the one reminding him that the info is backed by solid sources and telling him to take it to the talk page if he disagrees. I was about to report him for edit warring but decided it was not worth the energy. But of course, there will always be people wanting to delete info and not be happy for me to correct them.
And I'm not afraid since the majority of my edits were in good faith and the person in that admin message board - Crmoorhead -Is the very person who should be banned for excessive bad faith editing and vandalism if you do check the bolivia page of the past 24 hours. If anything, I am the only honest editor not willing to let bad faith editors delete REAL info from Bolivia page but I also understand that there are people like Crmoorhead who really wants to remove me since he knows that the facts are on my side and editors like me keeps the page honest.
Also, I like to formally report Crmoorhead for his own vast vandalism on bolivia's page and using false reasoning that looks proper but are just untrue if people were to really study it, and he is effectively deleting large amounts of info from the bolivia page that he simply dislikes. And that isn't right. Unlike him, I have not deleted any information from that page that is well backed by sources but rescued them. He realizes that he can't delete my edits as they are backed by strong sources so he makes an arbitrary case against me despite he is the one who should be banned for deleting info and my real crime was to oppose him on that. I'm not naive about his motivations and welcome a fair and thorough investigation to the both of us.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/985016572
49.180.129.245 ( talk) 06:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |