This user page was nominated for
deletion on 24 May 2024. The result of the discussion was userfy.
Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds
user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.
This user page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This page is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic
coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page. Please remember to
avoid self-references and maintain a
neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Thanks for defamation
I need to get an admin review for the false accusations for sockpuppetry. I didn't knew why and how some one can accuse for something trivial?
SuperHero โ ๐ โ
โ 18:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Your fault for vote stacking and signing as a banned user to promote your DYK noms.
48JCLTALK 19:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I told you I do not negotiate with any user without sane reason accuses for sockpuppetry. Anyways, I have been warned by users and not repeated that and even votestacking would have been done (or not to be precise) I abide by rules. My record is clean and your false claims of sockpuppetry is just
harassment. See you and get well soon brother. SuperHero โ ๐ โ
โ 21:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
A cookie for you!
Hey
48JCL, thank you so much for doing the GA review for my article
npm left-pad incident! I appreciate the feedback about sourcing and I'll be sure to keep it in mind for the future. Have a good one! ~
Liancetalk 21:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi 48JCL! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Hi 48JCL! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
I saw your signature at
this AfD, which has gotten pretty heated, and thought โ did they really tag this guy's !vote with citation needed and dubious? That would be a whole new level of
badgering! Thankfully, it was just your signature, which gave me a good laugh.
Toadspike[Talk] 08:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry
Per
this discussion, it appears I was wrong about that redirect from the old user talk page. I've now deleted it, sorry for the hassle.
Floquenbeam (
talk) 19:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Odd welcomes
Why are you welcoming editors who haven't edited in years? --
Ponyobons mots 20:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
It's just useless. They made three edits 7 years ago. In addition, the edits introduced unsourced promotional content to a BLP, but your welcome makes no mentions of these concerns. --
Ponyobons mots 20:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello. I appreciate that you're trying to get into reviewing, but I was hoping that you could return
Talk:Fear of bees/GA1 and
Talk:Autocracy/GA3 so more experienced reviewers can address them. I'd also prefer if you didn't appoint yourself the source reviewer of my other nomination
Talk:Federalist No. 8/GA1 despite the actual reviewer
not accepting your offer to share the review.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 00:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you, and done. Cheers!
48JCLTALK 02:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
This user page was nominated for
deletion on 24 May 2024. The result of the discussion was userfy.
Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds
user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.
This user page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This page is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic
coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page. Please remember to
avoid self-references and maintain a
neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Thanks for defamation
I need to get an admin review for the false accusations for sockpuppetry. I didn't knew why and how some one can accuse for something trivial?
SuperHero โ ๐ โ
โ 18:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Your fault for vote stacking and signing as a banned user to promote your DYK noms.
48JCLTALK 19:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I told you I do not negotiate with any user without sane reason accuses for sockpuppetry. Anyways, I have been warned by users and not repeated that and even votestacking would have been done (or not to be precise) I abide by rules. My record is clean and your false claims of sockpuppetry is just
harassment. See you and get well soon brother. SuperHero โ ๐ โ
โ 21:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
A cookie for you!
Hey
48JCL, thank you so much for doing the GA review for my article
npm left-pad incident! I appreciate the feedback about sourcing and I'll be sure to keep it in mind for the future. Have a good one! ~
Liancetalk 21:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi 48JCL! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Hi 48JCL! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
I saw your signature at
this AfD, which has gotten pretty heated, and thought โ did they really tag this guy's !vote with citation needed and dubious? That would be a whole new level of
badgering! Thankfully, it was just your signature, which gave me a good laugh.
Toadspike[Talk] 08:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry
Per
this discussion, it appears I was wrong about that redirect from the old user talk page. I've now deleted it, sorry for the hassle.
Floquenbeam (
talk) 19:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Odd welcomes
Why are you welcoming editors who haven't edited in years? --
Ponyobons mots 20:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
It's just useless. They made three edits 7 years ago. In addition, the edits introduced unsourced promotional content to a BLP, but your welcome makes no mentions of these concerns. --
Ponyobons mots 20:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello. I appreciate that you're trying to get into reviewing, but I was hoping that you could return
Talk:Fear of bees/GA1 and
Talk:Autocracy/GA3 so more experienced reviewers can address them. I'd also prefer if you didn't appoint yourself the source reviewer of my other nomination
Talk:Federalist No. 8/GA1 despite the actual reviewer
not accepting your offer to share the review.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 00:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you, and done. Cheers!
48JCLTALK 02:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply