Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie ( talk) 15:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

It was a restoration of previous destructive editing. Please check edit history. 43.153.25.155 ( talk) 15:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The content doesn't meet Wikipedia's requirements and never should have been there in the first place. It was rightfully removed and you should not be putting it back. MrOllie ( talk) 15:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

what requirement? 43.153.25.155 ( talk) 15:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

WP:V, WP:NOR, etc. MrOllie ( talk) 15:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

But the lists are indeed very informative and helpful. 43.153.25.155 ( talk) 15:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

That doesn't matter. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of 'helpful' information, it is an encyclopedia. If you would like to argue for inclusion, you must go to the article's associated talk page and secure agreement from other editors there. Repeatedly putting it back is itself a violation of Wikipedia policy and could get your IP address blocked from further editing. MrOllie ( talk) 15:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Ok, I will make a discussion there and try to reach the consensus. 43.153.25.155 ( talk) 15:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie ( talk) 00:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Automotive industry in China.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 18:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.