From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.125.9.178 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

why did you block this for so long. it's not an open proxy

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 09:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.125.9.178 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

this account only has 2 edits, nothing else. improper block

Decline reason:

Nothing good has ever come from this IP address, and it's probably open wifi. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 18:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Minorax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Club Football Association—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Shaheed Benazirabad, Nawabshah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deiannewela, you may be blocked from editing. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deiannewela. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Minorax: Closing AfD discussions isn't vandalism. It happens all the time and the discussion pages are over a week old. 208.125.9.178 ( talk) 11:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Well the motive is clear. but 2 other IPs were blocked for the same reason and you are signing off as someone else. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Minorax:

The editors that blocked the IPs don't understand the AfD process. They simply don't like the fact I'm help with AfD pages. 208.125.9.178 ( talk) 11:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.125.9.178 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

why did you block this for so long. it's not an open proxy

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 09:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.125.9.178 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

this account only has 2 edits, nothing else. improper block

Decline reason:

Nothing good has ever come from this IP address, and it's probably open wifi. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 18:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm Minorax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Club Football Association—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Shaheed Benazirabad, Nawabshah. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deiannewela, you may be blocked from editing. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deiannewela. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Minorax: Closing AfD discussions isn't vandalism. It happens all the time and the discussion pages are over a week old. 208.125.9.178 ( talk) 11:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Well the motive is clear. but 2 other IPs were blocked for the same reason and you are signing off as someone else. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 11:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Minorax:

The editors that blocked the IPs don't understand the AfD process. They simply don't like the fact I'm help with AfD pages. 208.125.9.178 ( talk) 11:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook