Hello, I'm
Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Harrison Trimble High School has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jackfork (
talk)
12:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
National Lampoon's Gold Diggers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(✉)
21:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Sucralose— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
21:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Hard problem of consciousness. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Shellwood (
talk)
16:21, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Intelligent design. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Jeb3
Talk at me here
15:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
The article starts with an opinion that Intelligent design is pseudoscience. Then it juxtaposes it against other opinions making them seem to be science and Intelligent design is not. However until there is a real cosmological theory one way, or the other then it is all just opinion. The universe began from nothing and space and time began at the same time. There was nothing else. I write and publish on cosmology regularly and used to work with the late Stephen Hawking. Everything in this regard is just opinion. There is no proof of anything else and starting out an article by insulting the people who have tried to offer an opinion is not what should be seen in this venue. The article mocks what the real science behind the whole debate is.
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
Talk:Richard Dawkins are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines,
not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
DVdm (
talk)
14:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
High five, you may be
blocked from editing.
JesseRafe (
talk)
19:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
CLCStudent (
talk)
19:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cotton-Eyed Joe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
List of people from Peterborough, Ontario have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Jusdafax (
talk)
00:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello, I'm
Jackfork. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Harrison Trimble High School has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jackfork (
talk)
12:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
National Lampoon's Gold Diggers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(✉)
21:32, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Sucralose— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Dat Guy
Talk
Contribs
21:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Hard problem of consciousness. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Shellwood (
talk)
16:21, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Intelligent design. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Jeb3
Talk at me here
15:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
The article starts with an opinion that Intelligent design is pseudoscience. Then it juxtaposes it against other opinions making them seem to be science and Intelligent design is not. However until there is a real cosmological theory one way, or the other then it is all just opinion. The universe began from nothing and space and time began at the same time. There was nothing else. I write and publish on cosmology regularly and used to work with the late Stephen Hawking. Everything in this regard is just opinion. There is no proof of anything else and starting out an article by insulting the people who have tried to offer an opinion is not what should be seen in this venue. The article mocks what the real science behind the whole debate is.
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
Talk:Richard Dawkins are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines,
not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
DVdm (
talk)
14:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
High five, you may be
blocked from editing.
JesseRafe (
talk)
19:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
CLCStudent (
talk)
19:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cotton-Eyed Joe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 02:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
List of people from Peterborough, Ontario have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Jusdafax (
talk)
00:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |