Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.
Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. ![]() |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.--
Darryl Kerrigan (
talk)
20:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2019 Canadian Parliament infiltration plot shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IanDBeacon ( talk) 21:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
—ScottyWong—
05:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
As I see that discussions of the changes you would like on this article has not yet reached consensus (a policy you seem to already be aware of, yet inexplicably aren't following yourself), you would be wise to not start another edit war there – especially since you've already been warned and blocked for doing so before.
I would also advise against removing sources; what benefit can that have to the verifiability of the article, unless they are wholly irrelevant?
And above all, especially in a case of disputed changes like this, an edit summary of merely "Revert" is just not good enough – you need to explain your removal of so much content. After seeing your past edit summaries attempting to push this to ArbCom, the only reason anyone would need to take anything here to ArbCom is you and your insistence on getting your way with the article, and I'm not even sure why you seem to be taking this article so personally. Do you have some kind of COI? Either way, your approach and attitude is not healthy here.
For now, I and Darryl have picked through your "Revert" and restored the parts that shouldn't have been removed. And honestly, with how much has been changed recently, I'm not even confident that the state of the article now is ideal and not missing any important details.
Anyway, I was going to warn you that I would report you if you did any more disruptive editing or edit warring, but as you have now been reported to WP:AN/I, I'll just say this: I don't know if anything will come of that report, but if nothing does, just know that I will be watching for any bad behavior and will not hesitate to report you elsewhere (such as WP:AN/EW) as needed. — Garrett W. { ☎ ✍} 01:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
22:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Peaceray. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Yuen Pau Woo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please explain on the talk page why this is NPOV OR.
Peaceray (
talk)
05:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Pbritti (
talk)
12:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have been reverted multiple times, by multiple editors. Stop adding your unsourced commentary about the possible arsons. Meters ( talk) 07:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary, as you did at
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites.
Meters (
talk)
01:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Meters (
talk)
01:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
User talk:Meters/unprotected. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Stay off my talk page.
Meters (
talk)
01:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
User talk:Meters/unprotected. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
—asparagusus
(interaction)
sprouts!
01:29, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Your talk page access has been revoked. Cullen328 ( talk) 03:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Registered editors may wish to read WP:DNFTT. |
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.
Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. ![]() |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.--
Darryl Kerrigan (
talk)
20:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2019 Canadian Parliament infiltration plot shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IanDBeacon ( talk) 21:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
—ScottyWong—
05:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
20:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
As I see that discussions of the changes you would like on this article has not yet reached consensus (a policy you seem to already be aware of, yet inexplicably aren't following yourself), you would be wise to not start another edit war there – especially since you've already been warned and blocked for doing so before.
I would also advise against removing sources; what benefit can that have to the verifiability of the article, unless they are wholly irrelevant?
And above all, especially in a case of disputed changes like this, an edit summary of merely "Revert" is just not good enough – you need to explain your removal of so much content. After seeing your past edit summaries attempting to push this to ArbCom, the only reason anyone would need to take anything here to ArbCom is you and your insistence on getting your way with the article, and I'm not even sure why you seem to be taking this article so personally. Do you have some kind of COI? Either way, your approach and attitude is not healthy here.
For now, I and Darryl have picked through your "Revert" and restored the parts that shouldn't have been removed. And honestly, with how much has been changed recently, I'm not even confident that the state of the article now is ideal and not missing any important details.
Anyway, I was going to warn you that I would report you if you did any more disruptive editing or edit warring, but as you have now been reported to WP:AN/I, I'll just say this: I don't know if anything will come of that report, but if nothing does, just know that I will be watching for any bad behavior and will not hesitate to report you elsewhere (such as WP:AN/EW) as needed. — Garrett W. { ☎ ✍} 01:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
22:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Peaceray. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Yuen Pau Woo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Please explain on the talk page why this is NPOV OR.
Peaceray (
talk)
05:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Pbritti (
talk)
12:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have been reverted multiple times, by multiple editors. Stop adding your unsourced commentary about the possible arsons. Meters ( talk) 07:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary, as you did at
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites.
Meters (
talk)
01:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Canadian Indian residential school gravesites. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Meters (
talk)
01:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
User talk:Meters/unprotected. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Stay off my talk page.
Meters (
talk)
01:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
User talk:Meters/unprotected. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
—asparagusus
(interaction)
sprouts!
01:29, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Your talk page access has been revoked. Cullen328 ( talk) 03:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Registered editors may wish to read WP:DNFTT. |
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |