Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Imperialism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Imperialism was changed by 204.85.24.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-07-20T05:42:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 05:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Sam Wu constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thanks.
Someguy1221 (
talk)
05:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Sam Wu. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
Fieldday-sunday (
talk)
16:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with
this edit to
Sam Wu, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute
vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷
talk
03:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Midget has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Bart133
t
c
@
How's my driving?
02:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Midget constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Bfigura's puppy (
talk)
02:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Birth-Mark, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Birth-Mark was changed by 204.85.24.5 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-11T17:11:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 17:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Mental confusion constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you. RJaguar3 |
u |
t
19:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary. Thank you.
leujohn (
talk,
contribs)
13:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Watt. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Piano non troppo (
talk)
02:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Ideal gas law, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
19:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
James T. Kirk. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
04:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Kandi Burruss has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
unwanted links and
spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following
regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links:
http://www.myspace.com/kandionline).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
John C. Calhoun has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Dog
poster
21:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to the page
Ackermann function. Such edits constitute
vandalism and are
reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
20:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Assassin's Creed II, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Teabagging, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
LizardJr8 (
talk)
02:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Richard Gay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
Christian75 (
talk)
20:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to the page
Richard Gay (rugby league). Such edits constitute
vandalism and are
reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Christian75 (
talk)
20:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
El DeBarge. It is considered
vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to
a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. ZacBowling (
user|
talk)
03:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Dita Formánková has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
The Thing //
Talk //
Contribs
16:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Sufjan Stevens has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
03:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
Signature song. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Because of your track record of warnings, I think it's fair to assume you're aware that adding unsourced material is not helpful in the slightest, and if you continue you will indeed be held accountable.
Geeky Randy (
talk)
01:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Entourage (TV series) with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Orange Suede Sofa (
talk)
03:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did with
this edit to
Jason Smith (American basketball), is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.
ZamorakO o (
talk)
03:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Philadelphia Experiment. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Dougweller (
talk)
20:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Utah with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Trusilver
04:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
I am r000t (
talk)
04:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Richard Dawkins, you may be
blocked from editing. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
01:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to
Galivants Ferry, South Carolina constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
05:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mann jess. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Star Trek into Darkness because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks! —
Jess·
Δ
♥
05:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Invisible ink. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism and make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (204.85.24.5) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
Jackson Peebles (
talk)
20:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Balsam, North Carolina, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
MelbourneStar☆
talk
15:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Balsam, North Carolina. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in
vandalism. Thank you.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to
Aggregate supply constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
18:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your further edit to
Aggregate supply constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
18:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Aggregate supply with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Wikipelli
Talk
19:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did again to
Aggregate supply, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Donner60 (
talk)
19:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Military use of children.
Josh3580
talk/
hist
19:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Ardrey Kell High School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Dea
db
eef
21:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
War wizard90. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
James C. Brincefield, Jr. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. -
War wizard90 (
talk)
01:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Oil drop experiment. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Kkmurray (
talk)
20:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TCMemoire. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Laura Bush— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. –
T
C
Memoire
05:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Qzd (
talk)
03:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Contributor321 (
talk)
01:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Gavin Andrews".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 22:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Stickee
(talk)
03:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to
United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Donner60 (
talk)
04:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 23:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 00:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Jet fuel— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
Non-Dropframe
talk
20:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Laura Bush. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
20:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Robert W. Alexander".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 22:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Edward H. Adelson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert W. Alexander, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Edward H. Adelson".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 23:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Robert W. Alexander".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 23:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Just Do It have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks. –
Gilliam (
talk)
19:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Just Do It. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
19:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Just Do It. It is considered
vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to
being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. –
Gilliam (
talk)
19:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics.
Plandu (
talk)
15:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Imperialism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Imperialism was changed by 204.85.24.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-07-20T05:42:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 05:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Sam Wu constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thanks.
Someguy1221 (
talk)
05:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with
this edit to
Sam Wu. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
Fieldday-sunday (
talk)
16:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with
this edit to
Sam Wu, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute
vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷
talk
03:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Midget has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Bart133
t
c
@
How's my driving?
02:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Midget constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Bfigura's puppy (
talk)
02:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Birth-Mark, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Birth-Mark was changed by 204.85.24.5 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-11T17:11:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 17:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Mental confusion constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you. RJaguar3 |
u |
t
19:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an
edit summary. Thank you.
leujohn (
talk,
contribs)
13:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Watt. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Piano non troppo (
talk)
02:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Ideal gas law, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
19:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
James T. Kirk. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
04:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Kandi Burruss has been reverted.
Your edit
here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove
unwanted links and
spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following
regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links:
http://www.myspace.com/kandionline).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
John C. Calhoun has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Dog
poster
21:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to the page
Ackermann function. Such edits constitute
vandalism and are
reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
20:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Assassin's Creed II, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Teabagging, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
LizardJr8 (
talk)
02:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Richard Gay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
Christian75 (
talk)
20:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to the page
Richard Gay (rugby league). Such edits constitute
vandalism and are
reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Christian75 (
talk)
20:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
El DeBarge. It is considered
vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to
a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. ZacBowling (
user|
talk)
03:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Dita Formánková has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
The Thing //
Talk //
Contribs
16:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Sufjan Stevens has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
03:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
Signature song. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Because of your track record of warnings, I think it's fair to assume you're aware that adding unsourced material is not helpful in the slightest, and if you continue you will indeed be held accountable.
Geeky Randy (
talk)
01:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Entourage (TV series) with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Orange Suede Sofa (
talk)
03:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did with
this edit to
Jason Smith (American basketball), is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.
ZamorakO o (
talk)
03:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Philadelphia Experiment. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Dougweller (
talk)
20:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Utah with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Trusilver
04:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave with
this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
I am r000t (
talk)
04:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Richard Dawkins, you may be
blocked from editing. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
01:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to
Galivants Ferry, South Carolina constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
05:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mann jess. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Star Trek into Darkness because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks! —
Jess·
Δ
♥
05:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Invisible ink. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism and make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (204.85.24.5) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
Jackson Peebles (
talk)
20:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
MusikAnimal
talk
16:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Balsam, North Carolina, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
MelbourneStar☆
talk
15:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Balsam, North Carolina. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in
vandalism. Thank you.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to
Aggregate supply constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
18:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your further edit to
Aggregate supply constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Donner60 (
talk)
18:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Aggregate supply with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Wikipelli
Talk
19:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did again to
Aggregate supply, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Donner60 (
talk)
19:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Military use of children.
Josh3580
talk/
hist
19:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Ardrey Kell High School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Dea
db
eef
21:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
War wizard90. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
James C. Brincefield, Jr. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. -
War wizard90 (
talk)
01:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Oil drop experiment. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Kkmurray (
talk)
20:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TCMemoire. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Laura Bush— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. –
T
C
Memoire
05:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Qzd (
talk)
03:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Contributor321 (
talk)
01:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Gavin Andrews".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 22:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Stickee
(talk)
03:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to
United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Donner60 (
talk)
04:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 23:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 00:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Jet fuel— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
Non-Dropframe
talk
20:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Laura Bush. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
20:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Robert W. Alexander".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 22:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Edward H. Adelson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert W. Alexander, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Edward H. Adelson".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 23:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Robert W. Alexander".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 23:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Just Do It have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks. –
Gilliam (
talk)
19:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Just Do It. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
19:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Just Do It. It is considered
vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to
being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the
sandbox. –
Gilliam (
talk)
19:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics.
Plandu (
talk)
15:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)