Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
|
![]() |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
![]()
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieWikiDan ( talk) 12:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Can't ping IPs, see Talk:RAS syndrome - wolf 20:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
If this is a
shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider
creating an account for yourself or
logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 20:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC) If this is a
shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider
creating an account for yourself or
logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
![]() You have been
blocked from editing for a period of one week for
edit warring and violating the
three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to
discuss controversial changes and seek
consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} .
Daniel Case (
talk)
02:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Itcouldbepossible. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Talk:Rosa Bonheur—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Itcouldbepossible
Talk
13:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Mosquitofish, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
CodeTalker (
talk)
16:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in
loss of editing privileges.
This disruptive edit warring and
WP:EVASION needs to stop. You now have the attention of multiple admins, including
C.Fred and
Paul Erik, among others, what do you expect to accomplish with this behaviour? Either wait out your block, or try to successfully appeal it. Once you are free to edit again, seek to make your changes according to the policies and guidelines of this project. -
wolf
00:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Thewolfchild. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
RAS syndrome have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks. -
wolf
16:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at RAS syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 16:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Ricardo López (stalker). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tommi1986 let's talk! 19:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
RAS syndrome. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 16:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
C.Fred (
talk)
16:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:198.70.2.200 reported by User:Throast (Result: ). Thank you.
Throast {{ping}} me! (
talk |
contribs)
16:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. -
wolf
16:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:198.70.2.200 reported by User:Tommi1986 (Result: ). Thank you.
Tommi1986
let's talk!
19:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
19:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)198.70.2.200 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was in the middle of TRYING to reach a consensus 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not really a reason for unblock. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Consensus was already reached on the Ricardo Lopez talk page. It was agreed that the audio is muffled. So muffled, in fact, that enough people hear him say 'victory' that a tag was required telling people not to change it to 'victory' 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC) 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
198.70.2.200 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for making an edit on which consensus was already reached on the talk page 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 13:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please show where that consensus was reached, but that does not justify edit warring. 331dot ( talk) 14:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
198.70.2.200 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
On the Ricardo Lopez talk page the user I was discussing it with agreed that the audio was muffled. Whoever added the 'Do not put Victory here' tag here also seemed to agree, as enough people heard him say 'victory' that it warranted a tag prohibiting it. As for the edit warring, the consensus was already reached before I made the first edit. 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as user can no longer edit this talk page, so there's no point in leaving the request open. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
198.70.2.200 ( talk) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
|
![]() |
---|
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
![]()
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieWikiDan ( talk) 12:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Can't ping IPs, see Talk:RAS syndrome - wolf 20:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
If this is a
shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider
creating an account for yourself or
logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 20:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC) If this is a
shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider
creating an account for yourself or
logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
![]() You have been
blocked from editing for a period of one week for
edit warring and violating the
three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to
discuss controversial changes and seek
consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} .
Daniel Case (
talk)
02:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Itcouldbepossible. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Talk:Rosa Bonheur—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Itcouldbepossible
Talk
13:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Mosquitofish, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
CodeTalker (
talk)
16:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's
policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in
loss of editing privileges.
This disruptive edit warring and
WP:EVASION needs to stop. You now have the attention of multiple admins, including
C.Fred and
Paul Erik, among others, what do you expect to accomplish with this behaviour? Either wait out your block, or try to successfully appeal it. Once you are free to edit again, seek to make your changes according to the policies and guidelines of this project. -
wolf
00:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Thewolfchild. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
RAS syndrome have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks. -
wolf
16:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at RAS syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 16:12, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Ricardo López (stalker). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tommi1986 let's talk! 19:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
RAS syndrome. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 16:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
C.Fred (
talk)
16:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:198.70.2.200 reported by User:Throast (Result: ). Thank you.
Throast {{ping}} me! (
talk |
contribs)
16:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. -
wolf
16:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:198.70.2.200 reported by User:Tommi1986 (Result: ). Thank you.
Tommi1986
let's talk!
19:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
19:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)198.70.2.200 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was in the middle of TRYING to reach a consensus 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not really a reason for unblock. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Consensus was already reached on the Ricardo Lopez talk page. It was agreed that the audio is muffled. So muffled, in fact, that enough people hear him say 'victory' that a tag was required telling people not to change it to 'victory' 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC) 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 19:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
198.70.2.200 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for making an edit on which consensus was already reached on the talk page 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 13:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please show where that consensus was reached, but that does not justify edit warring. 331dot ( talk) 14:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
198.70.2.200 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
On the Ricardo Lopez talk page the user I was discussing it with agreed that the audio was muffled. Whoever added the 'Do not put Victory here' tag here also seemed to agree, as enough people heard him say 'victory' that it warranted a tag prohibiting it. As for the edit warring, the consensus was already reached before I made the first edit. 198.70.2.200 ( talk) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as user can no longer edit this talk page, so there's no point in leaving the request open. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
198.70.2.200 ( talk) 14:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |