 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
soft block using {{
School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
 Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can
subscribe to a
web feed of this page in either
RSS or
Atom format. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
BP has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
Uncle Dick (
talk)
23:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Felipe Jesus Consalvos has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Felipe Jesus Consalvos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.dazeddigital.com/blog/article/16844/1/tabaquero-collage) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
21:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to
List of cyberpunk works have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
List of cyberpunk works was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/15040/1/the-desert-of-the-unreal/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
19:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
16:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Seriously, Ronhjones, you are blocking an IP at the Art Institute of Chicago, for adding links to scholarly descriptions in a catalogue of works in their own collection? Quite bizarre. Theramin ( talk) 22:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
198.40.29.65 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Ronhjones In partnership with the J. Paul Getty Museum and eight other institutions, the Art Institute of Chicago began the process of publishing digital catalogues as part of the Online Scholarly Catalogue Initiative (OSCI) in 2009. Since then, the Art Institute of Chicago has digitally published ten catalogues, each freely accessible from our website, and pertaining either to exhibitions supported by the museum or to works in the museum’s collections.
Beginning on May 1, 2017 the Department of Publications contributed to fifty-four wikipedia entries of artists and artworks featured in our catalogues to embed links to relevant catalogues and/or specific catalogue entries in hopes of broadening access to new scholarship.
It is understandable that the rate and quantity of edits might at first register as spam, but the content and intent of the material and contributions are solely interested in making available new and up-to-date scholarly research in the fields of art history and conservation. If the content of the linked catalogues is thought to be too tangential, then, once unblocked, we will only contribute to wikipedia entries in direct relation to the entire digital catalogue. 198.40.29.65 ( talk) 19:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You embedded links into Wikipedia articles in hopes of broadening access to new scholarship, to drive traffic to your website, to spam Wikipedia. You will not be unblocked to continue with that. Huon ( talk) 19:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Well, this is all a bit disappointing: we are rejecting links to high-quality scholarly sources as "spam", and blocking further contributions from what our own article calls "one of the oldest and largest art museums in the United States". Let us hope that interested editors spot the addition and removal of links to the new materials and weave them into the relevant articles. For what it is worth, I'm grateful for the addition at Paris Street; Rainy Day, and I am sorry this IP has been treated so badly. Theramin ( talk) 01:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
soft block using {{
School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can
subscribe to a
web feed of this page in either
RSS or
Atom format. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
BP has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
Uncle Dick (
talk)
23:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Felipe Jesus Consalvos has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Felipe Jesus Consalvos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.dazeddigital.com/blog/article/16844/1/tabaquero-collage) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
21:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to
List of cyberpunk works have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
List of cyberpunk works was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/15040/1/the-desert-of-the-unreal/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
19:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
16:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Seriously, Ronhjones, you are blocking an IP at the Art Institute of Chicago, for adding links to scholarly descriptions in a catalogue of works in their own collection? Quite bizarre. Theramin ( talk) 22:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
198.40.29.65 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Ronhjones In partnership with the J. Paul Getty Museum and eight other institutions, the Art Institute of Chicago began the process of publishing digital catalogues as part of the Online Scholarly Catalogue Initiative (OSCI) in 2009. Since then, the Art Institute of Chicago has digitally published ten catalogues, each freely accessible from our website, and pertaining either to exhibitions supported by the museum or to works in the museum’s collections.
Beginning on May 1, 2017 the Department of Publications contributed to fifty-four wikipedia entries of artists and artworks featured in our catalogues to embed links to relevant catalogues and/or specific catalogue entries in hopes of broadening access to new scholarship.
It is understandable that the rate and quantity of edits might at first register as spam, but the content and intent of the material and contributions are solely interested in making available new and up-to-date scholarly research in the fields of art history and conservation. If the content of the linked catalogues is thought to be too tangential, then, once unblocked, we will only contribute to wikipedia entries in direct relation to the entire digital catalogue. 198.40.29.65 ( talk) 19:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You embedded links into Wikipedia articles in hopes of broadening access to new scholarship, to drive traffic to your website, to spam Wikipedia. You will not be unblocked to continue with that. Huon ( talk) 19:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Well, this is all a bit disappointing: we are rejecting links to high-quality scholarly sources as "spam", and blocking further contributions from what our own article calls "one of the oldest and largest art museums in the United States". Let us hope that interested editors spot the addition and removal of links to the new materials and weave them into the relevant articles. For what it is worth, I'm grateful for the addition at Paris Street; Rainy Day, and I am sorry this IP has been treated so badly. Theramin ( talk) 01:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
|
| This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |