Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Whitehead has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of CAx companies may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Bert Cook (rugby) has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Bert Cook (rugby) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://pastcougars.moonfruit.com/the-rock-n-roll-50s/4516792846,
https://web.archive.org/web/20090527010230/http://pastcougars.moonfruit.com:80/the-50s-part-2/4516792867) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
09:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to
Yorkshire Rugby Football Union have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
Yorkshire Rugby Football Union was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://en-gb.facebook.com/withernsearufc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Michael Morgan (rugby league, born 1991)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
-- Rrburke (
talk)
12:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Onosai Tololima-Auva'a. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Flooded with them
hundreds
13:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Please read wp:brd. if you have been reverted it is down to you to make a case. I also feel wp:editwar and WP:NOTDUMB might be worth your time. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
OK lets make it "official".
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
( talk) Ok, I will present my point. I have made my statement clear on /info/en/?search=User_talk:Cambial_Yellowing#Turning_Point_UK_-_Unnecessary_edits who started this edit war. An article which talks about an organisation should never contain opinionated statements from media outlets. If that's the case, I should be allowed to post an opinionated statement from a right-leaning journalist who thinks this organisation encourages debate? Do you want me to add that in?
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be
blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
Cambial
foliage❧
14:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You did not read wp:editwar did you? You need to undo your latest revert or you may well get a block, edit warring whistle under an ANI or edit war report is really very foolish. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Seriously, are you trying to get a block, you need to stop reverting. Right now you are heading for one. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Slatersteven (
talk)
14:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
15:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)You are only blocked from editing the article itself, you may contribute to the article talk page and make a case for what you wish to see. 331dot ( talk) 15:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Whitehead has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of CAx companies may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Bert Cook (rugby) has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Bert Cook (rugby) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://pastcougars.moonfruit.com/the-rock-n-roll-50s/4516792846,
https://web.archive.org/web/20090527010230/http://pastcougars.moonfruit.com:80/the-50s-part-2/4516792867) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
09:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to
Yorkshire Rugby Football Union have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
Yorkshire Rugby Football Union was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://en-gb.facebook.com/withernsearufc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
10:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Michael Morgan (rugby league, born 1991)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
-- Rrburke (
talk)
12:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Onosai Tololima-Auva'a. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Flooded with them
hundreds
13:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Please read wp:brd. if you have been reverted it is down to you to make a case. I also feel wp:editwar and WP:NOTDUMB might be worth your time. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
OK lets make it "official".
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
( talk) Ok, I will present my point. I have made my statement clear on /info/en/?search=User_talk:Cambial_Yellowing#Turning_Point_UK_-_Unnecessary_edits who started this edit war. An article which talks about an organisation should never contain opinionated statements from media outlets. If that's the case, I should be allowed to post an opinionated statement from a right-leaning journalist who thinks this organisation encourages debate? Do you want me to add that in?
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be
blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
Cambial
foliage❧
14:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You did not read wp:editwar did you? You need to undo your latest revert or you may well get a block, edit warring whistle under an ANI or edit war report is really very foolish. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Seriously, are you trying to get a block, you need to stop reverting. Right now you are heading for one. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Slatersteven (
talk)
14:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
331dot (
talk)
15:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)You are only blocked from editing the article itself, you may contribute to the article talk page and make a case for what you wish to see. 331dot ( talk) 15:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |