Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Hello 190.42.46.62, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
1962 have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 23:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Babymissfortune. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Baby
miss
fortune
00:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Alberta Gay. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kirbanzo ( talk) 02:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Fredo Santana, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please note that "U.S." or equivalent is not necessary after a city and/ or state. Since there is no Reseda, Los Angeles, California outside the US this is unneeded information.
Redalert2fan (
talk)
21:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
1960 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
CLCStudent (
talk)
23:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
1960. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
CLCStudent (
talk)
00:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with
this edit to
Francesco Barbaro (gangster). Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Shellwood (
talk)
21:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Drena De Niro.
Jannik Schwaß (
talk)
21:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Kevin Quinn (actor).
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
17:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
17:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Your recent editing history at 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly ( talk) 01:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Midnight, Texas. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
20:15, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2019 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly ( talk) 01:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
CLCStudent (
talk)
20:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
1996. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
CLCStudent (
talk)
20:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
1960, you may be
blocked from editing.
Mikemyers345 (
talk)
19:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
1999, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Not that there's any point, but your datadump edits are not constructive, your image choices are usually worse than previous or exceed the space available. Related pages in the past 12 hours:
1990,
1991,
1992,
1993,
1996. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk)
20:06, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Errors you are making in edits to year articles include:
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
1959.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
22:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Hello 190.42.46.62, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
1962 have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 23:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Babymissfortune. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Baby
miss
fortune
00:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Alberta Gay. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kirbanzo ( talk) 02:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Fredo Santana, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please note that "U.S." or equivalent is not necessary after a city and/ or state. Since there is no Reseda, Los Angeles, California outside the US this is unneeded information.
Redalert2fan (
talk)
21:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
1960 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
CLCStudent (
talk)
23:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
1960. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
CLCStudent (
talk)
00:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with
this edit to
Francesco Barbaro (gangster). Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Shellwood (
talk)
21:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Drena De Niro.
Jannik Schwaß (
talk)
21:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Kevin Quinn (actor).
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
17:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
17:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Your recent editing history at 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly ( talk) 01:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Midnight, Texas. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Geraldo Perez (
talk)
20:15, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2019 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly ( talk) 01:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
CLCStudent (
talk)
20:29, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
1996. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
CLCStudent (
talk)
20:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
21:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
1960, you may be
blocked from editing.
Mikemyers345 (
talk)
19:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
1999, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Not that there's any point, but your datadump edits are not constructive, your image choices are usually worse than previous or exceed the space available. Related pages in the past 12 hours:
1990,
1991,
1992,
1993,
1996. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk)
20:06, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Errors you are making in edits to year articles include:
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
1959.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
22:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |