Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
If you edit without an account, your IP address (184.88.43.62) is used to identify you instead.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and
create an account. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. We also have an
intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to
sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. ( talk to me) ( contributions) @ 04:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Cheese (recreational drug) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Stesmo (
talk)
06:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 21:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
The passage in Ben Sasse that you've repeatedly restored after others have deleted it (e.g. diff1, diff2, diff3), is a near-exact duplicate of one that's located elsewhere in the article. In deleting the passage, other editors have noted that it's a duplicate (e.g. diff1, diff2, diff3). You've offered no justification for this, in your edit summaries or at the talk page. This is creating a lot of needless work for your fellow editors. If you believe that there's a good reason for duplicating the passage, please explain it before restoring it once again; and please participate in discussion with other interested editors rather than just restoring the passage over and over. — Ammodramus ( talk) 14:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, per WP:BRD, when content you submit has been reverted by another user, the burden is yours to seek consensus for inclusion by opening a discussion on the article's talk page and getting feedback from other editors. Restoring the content simply because you're attached to it, is not conducive to a collaborative project like Wikipedia. I have opened a discussion for you at Talk:Raven-Symoné and you are urged to participate. Please note that restoring the content without achieving consensus is generally considered to be disruptive. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Raven-Symoné. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
Diff:
[1]
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
00:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Raven-Symoné. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Melonkelon ( talk) 01:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
17:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies ( talk) 20:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Rex Tillerson, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
FriyMan (
talk)
21:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
RSTech1. I noticed that in
this edit to
Rex Tillerson, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
RSTech1 (
talk)
21:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 16:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Invented tradition, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Sondra.kinsey (
talk)
04:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
You appear to be removing content related to Israel and Zionism without providing
edit summaries (eg. at
Nabulsi soap and
Invented tradition). Please provide an explanation for your edits in the edit summary, and consider discussing in the
talk page before removing cited content.
Sondra.kinsey (
talk)
11:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Regarding your edit on Death of Muammar Gaddafi, use the English "God is great" and not Arabic "Allāhu Akbar". BTW: "Akbar" should be capitalized. Thank you Jim1138 ( talk) 04:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Doug Weller talk 20:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Editors using IP addresses and any registered user with less than 30 days' tenure or fewer than 500 edits may not edit articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This includes edits such as the one you made to Nabulsi soap. If in doubt, don't. Doug Weller talk 20:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Popcorn, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
20:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Uncontacted peoples. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Kbseah (
talk)
21:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
19:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at
Meritocracy, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Mojoworker (
talk)
18:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Uppsala, you may be
blocked from editing.
bonadea
contributions
talk
04:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
PraiseVivec. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page.
Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please
redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been
vandalised, please
revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please
the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the
deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
PraiseVivec (
talk)
17:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Reply:
It was a non-sequitur of a political nature that has nothing to do with the subject matter. The proper edit for that is removal. I really don't care because the majority of the free world knows that Wikipedia's editing mafia has turned it into an unreliably biased source, which is a shame because previous to 2015 it was fairly neutral. Keep trying to edit reality, because it simply shows you as the hack that you are, and further discredits you.
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
If you edit without an account, your IP address (184.88.43.62) is used to identify you instead.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and
create an account. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. We also have an
intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to
sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. ( talk to me) ( contributions) @ 04:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Cheese (recreational drug) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Stesmo (
talk)
06:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 21:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
The passage in Ben Sasse that you've repeatedly restored after others have deleted it (e.g. diff1, diff2, diff3), is a near-exact duplicate of one that's located elsewhere in the article. In deleting the passage, other editors have noted that it's a duplicate (e.g. diff1, diff2, diff3). You've offered no justification for this, in your edit summaries or at the talk page. This is creating a lot of needless work for your fellow editors. If you believe that there's a good reason for duplicating the passage, please explain it before restoring it once again; and please participate in discussion with other interested editors rather than just restoring the passage over and over. — Ammodramus ( talk) 14:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, per WP:BRD, when content you submit has been reverted by another user, the burden is yours to seek consensus for inclusion by opening a discussion on the article's talk page and getting feedback from other editors. Restoring the content simply because you're attached to it, is not conducive to a collaborative project like Wikipedia. I have opened a discussion for you at Talk:Raven-Symoné and you are urged to participate. Please note that restoring the content without achieving consensus is generally considered to be disruptive. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:54, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Raven-Symoné. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
Diff:
[1]
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
00:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Raven-Symoné. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Melonkelon ( talk) 01:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
17:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies ( talk) 20:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Rex Tillerson, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
FriyMan (
talk)
21:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
RSTech1. I noticed that in
this edit to
Rex Tillerson, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
RSTech1 (
talk)
21:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 16:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Invented tradition, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
Sondra.kinsey (
talk)
04:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
You appear to be removing content related to Israel and Zionism without providing
edit summaries (eg. at
Nabulsi soap and
Invented tradition). Please provide an explanation for your edits in the edit summary, and consider discussing in the
talk page before removing cited content.
Sondra.kinsey (
talk)
11:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Regarding your edit on Death of Muammar Gaddafi, use the English "God is great" and not Arabic "Allāhu Akbar". BTW: "Akbar" should be capitalized. Thank you Jim1138 ( talk) 04:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Doug Weller talk 20:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Editors using IP addresses and any registered user with less than 30 days' tenure or fewer than 500 edits may not edit articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This includes edits such as the one you made to Nabulsi soap. If in doubt, don't. Doug Weller talk 20:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Popcorn, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
20:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Uncontacted peoples. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Kbseah (
talk)
21:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk)
19:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at
Meritocracy, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Mojoworker (
talk)
18:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Uppsala, you may be
blocked from editing.
bonadea
contributions
talk
04:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
PraiseVivec. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page.
Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please
redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been
vandalised, please
revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please
the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the
deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
PraiseVivec (
talk)
17:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Reply:
It was a non-sequitur of a political nature that has nothing to do with the subject matter. The proper edit for that is removal. I really don't care because the majority of the free world knows that Wikipedia's editing mafia has turned it into an unreliably biased source, which is a shame because previous to 2015 it was fairly neutral. Keep trying to edit reality, because it simply shows you as the hack that you are, and further discredits you.
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |