Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Battle of Khanwa, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an expanding project, and good content is always welcomeOf course...in a separate article. You are always welcome to create one.
It will take me time to write an appropriate response to this message and, unlike other edits, it is not something I can do whilst eating breakfast. I'm currently at work and I'll respond when I get the chance. I'm asking you to have the same patience with me which I had with the timing of your own replies. Thank you.
Alivardi
(talk)
11:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Violates WP:NPOVThe neutrality policy doesn't require opposite parties to be equally praised; it requires us to use neutral language for all sides. You've previously said that the article praises Babur in a similar way to the edit in question, but beyond noting his methods of achieving victory, I do not see what you are referring to. What happens in other articles should not be taken as examples, for unless they are among the featured, they are just as fallible to such issues as we are discussing.
Not related to the articleI do not believe I've ever said this. I only stated that this level of detail is irrelevant.
Too bigI want to point out that a total of five conflicts were mentioned in that section. Why does this particular skirmish need to take up nearly half the space?
Separate article requiredI did not say that a new article was required, nor did I mean that the content be simply copy-and-pasted into it. You are free to create this hypothetical article if you wish and expand it as much as you see fit.
Bloated and fawningAddressed above. For the record, we are very careful citing such ancient writers as Plutarch and Levy here as per WP:AGE MATTERS.
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Battle of Khanwa, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an expanding project, and good content is always welcomeOf course...in a separate article. You are always welcome to create one.
It will take me time to write an appropriate response to this message and, unlike other edits, it is not something I can do whilst eating breakfast. I'm currently at work and I'll respond when I get the chance. I'm asking you to have the same patience with me which I had with the timing of your own replies. Thank you.
Alivardi
(talk)
11:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Violates WP:NPOVThe neutrality policy doesn't require opposite parties to be equally praised; it requires us to use neutral language for all sides. You've previously said that the article praises Babur in a similar way to the edit in question, but beyond noting his methods of achieving victory, I do not see what you are referring to. What happens in other articles should not be taken as examples, for unless they are among the featured, they are just as fallible to such issues as we are discussing.
Not related to the articleI do not believe I've ever said this. I only stated that this level of detail is irrelevant.
Too bigI want to point out that a total of five conflicts were mentioned in that section. Why does this particular skirmish need to take up nearly half the space?
Separate article requiredI did not say that a new article was required, nor did I mean that the content be simply copy-and-pasted into it. You are free to create this hypothetical article if you wish and expand it as much as you see fit.
Bloated and fawningAddressed above. For the record, we are very careful citing such ancient writers as Plutarch and Levy here as per WP:AGE MATTERS.
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |