Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit ( talk) 08:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Duduk by EcoWorld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram ( talk) 14:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello 180degreesbrandcom. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:180degreesbrandcom. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=180degreesbrandcom|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Fram (
talk) 14:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on EcoWorld, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram ( talk) 14:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ Jimfbleak, Kindly help to unblock my user page in order disclosed paid editor in my userpage according to wikipedia guidelines. 180degreesbrandcom ( talk) 02:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
180degreesbrandcom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by EcoWorld for their contributions to Wikipedia. |
180degreesbrandcom ( talk) 09:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
180degreesbrandcom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
For the articles wise: What i will do for the content is i will relook into the content and adding more resources as in news articles to back up all the information that i added. As i relook into my articles as a nobody, i understand there might lack of resources to back up the sentences. Besides on this, i will add in timeline of history to show how the company have experience from the first day till now.
Before publish, i will submit for review instead of making live to get advice from admin first and see what else i can able to adjust.
Hope it clarifies. thanks :) 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 10:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Decline reason:
I said above "you do not tell us what edits you plan to make now that you know you won't be permitted to, at least for now, edit about your company or its clients". Someone else will review your request, but you seem to be saying you will continue to edit about your clients and don't address how you will comply with WP:PAID. 331dot ( talk) 10:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
180degreesbrandcom ( talk) 03:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
180degreesbrandcom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
2. I went thru my previous articles, understand all the resources are from dependent coverages. It looks too advertising. Hence i will readjust the content with significant, independent, reliable coverages. 3. Before, i publish it. I will send for review in order I am in a right track. 4. Sorry that i am a newbie here. And been trying to disgust all the wikipedia guides and rules in 48 hours
And, it is going to be my first start for contributing article in wikipedia. Hope that i can able to learn from here in order to contribute more articles especially to my own countries
Thanks.Decline reason:
Hello, I'm DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DarkAudit ( talk) 08:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Duduk by EcoWorld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram ( talk) 14:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello 180degreesbrandcom. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:180degreesbrandcom. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=180degreesbrandcom|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Fram (
talk) 14:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on EcoWorld, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram ( talk) 14:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ Jimfbleak, Kindly help to unblock my user page in order disclosed paid editor in my userpage according to wikipedia guidelines. 180degreesbrandcom ( talk) 02:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
180degreesbrandcom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by EcoWorld for their contributions to Wikipedia. |
180degreesbrandcom ( talk) 09:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
180degreesbrandcom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
For the articles wise: What i will do for the content is i will relook into the content and adding more resources as in news articles to back up all the information that i added. As i relook into my articles as a nobody, i understand there might lack of resources to back up the sentences. Besides on this, i will add in timeline of history to show how the company have experience from the first day till now.
Before publish, i will submit for review instead of making live to get advice from admin first and see what else i can able to adjust.
Hope it clarifies. thanks :) 180degreesbrandcom (talk) 10:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Decline reason:
I said above "you do not tell us what edits you plan to make now that you know you won't be permitted to, at least for now, edit about your company or its clients". Someone else will review your request, but you seem to be saying you will continue to edit about your clients and don't address how you will comply with WP:PAID. 331dot ( talk) 10:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
180degreesbrandcom ( talk) 03:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
180degreesbrandcom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
2. I went thru my previous articles, understand all the resources are from dependent coverages. It looks too advertising. Hence i will readjust the content with significant, independent, reliable coverages. 3. Before, i publish it. I will send for review in order I am in a right track. 4. Sorry that i am a newbie here. And been trying to disgust all the wikipedia guides and rules in 48 hours
And, it is going to be my first start for contributing article in wikipedia. Hope that i can able to learn from here in order to contribute more articles especially to my own countries
Thanks.Decline reason: