Hi there. First and foremost, welcome to Wikipedia. Secondly, I was hoping you could explain the reasons for your edit on Law of the United States here. Thanks, NW ( Talk) 16:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
My apologies for lack of intelligence, but I think you are confusing me with another editor. If you will recall my sole edit was to mark a sentence as unsourced. I can’ t imagine anyone having a problem with that. You and another person then entered an editing bonanza. I merely would like the original sentence with the notation that it is unsourced be returned. Of course, should someone find a source for that original sentence in question then my edit could then be replaced. As to the other edits, yours or otherwise, I have no opinion other than to point out that, to me, the referencing appears circular. Can we agree to return the sentence in question? After all, until my edit, you and others apparently had no problem with it. I would appreciate being allowed to enter my two cents. Thank you.
It is not very smart to delete the new references and label the sentence as unreferenced. It is certainly disruptive to keep revering it. Please read the section, and the cited references. If you till have a grievance, please post it in the talk page. Thank you. BatteryIncluded ( talk) 15:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring on the
Drake equation. The passage you keep trying to insert has nothing to do with Frank's equation and is not mentioned by him. Your continued reversions are not constructive and if they continue you may be banned from editing. Thank you,
David J Johnson (
talk)
21:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
This has been a real eye opener for me. I appreciate the education that the "dog in the manger" editors have given me. For now I know it is not possible to offer constructive input to wikipedia by anyone. My edit was limited to citing as unsourced a pre-existing sentence that all three of you kind editors knew was there and never touched it. So what do you all do when I place my "citation needed" edit? Find a reference for an implicitly accepted prior edit? No, rather you attack me, mock me and take no consideration that I am new to wikipedia and do not, as yet, know all the technical ways including "signing". I believe your collective actions are clearly contrary to wikipedia policy that everyone can contribute. The irony of you characterizing my edit as disruptive when it obviously led to the elimination of an erroneous statement that I did not agree with either (in my opinion). The only difference between you and me kind sir is that I was respectful enough to not remove what someone had placed but rather gave time and consideration that the original author and others could review and consider. After all, maybe the person (and their material) that you previously “approved” of can actually come up with a reference. Thanks to you now we will never know. The search for truth has been served, no? As for me I’ll take care to never encroach in your sandbox again….kind regards… s/unregistered IP person
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to
List of Family Guy characters. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the
sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you!
Demonuk (
talk)
06:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Taxin609. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Taxin609 (
Talk To Me)
21:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
interstatefive (
talk) - just another roadgeek
21:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio, you may be
blocked from editing.
interstatefive (
talk) - just another roadgeek
21:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio.
interstatefive (
talk) - just another roadgeek
21:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Porter Township, Scioto County, Ohio have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Dirkbb (
talk)
22:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hi there. First and foremost, welcome to Wikipedia. Secondly, I was hoping you could explain the reasons for your edit on Law of the United States here. Thanks, NW ( Talk) 16:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
My apologies for lack of intelligence, but I think you are confusing me with another editor. If you will recall my sole edit was to mark a sentence as unsourced. I can’ t imagine anyone having a problem with that. You and another person then entered an editing bonanza. I merely would like the original sentence with the notation that it is unsourced be returned. Of course, should someone find a source for that original sentence in question then my edit could then be replaced. As to the other edits, yours or otherwise, I have no opinion other than to point out that, to me, the referencing appears circular. Can we agree to return the sentence in question? After all, until my edit, you and others apparently had no problem with it. I would appreciate being allowed to enter my two cents. Thank you.
It is not very smart to delete the new references and label the sentence as unreferenced. It is certainly disruptive to keep revering it. Please read the section, and the cited references. If you till have a grievance, please post it in the talk page. Thank you. BatteryIncluded ( talk) 15:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring on the
Drake equation. The passage you keep trying to insert has nothing to do with Frank's equation and is not mentioned by him. Your continued reversions are not constructive and if they continue you may be banned from editing. Thank you,
David J Johnson (
talk)
21:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
This has been a real eye opener for me. I appreciate the education that the "dog in the manger" editors have given me. For now I know it is not possible to offer constructive input to wikipedia by anyone. My edit was limited to citing as unsourced a pre-existing sentence that all three of you kind editors knew was there and never touched it. So what do you all do when I place my "citation needed" edit? Find a reference for an implicitly accepted prior edit? No, rather you attack me, mock me and take no consideration that I am new to wikipedia and do not, as yet, know all the technical ways including "signing". I believe your collective actions are clearly contrary to wikipedia policy that everyone can contribute. The irony of you characterizing my edit as disruptive when it obviously led to the elimination of an erroneous statement that I did not agree with either (in my opinion). The only difference between you and me kind sir is that I was respectful enough to not remove what someone had placed but rather gave time and consideration that the original author and others could review and consider. After all, maybe the person (and their material) that you previously “approved” of can actually come up with a reference. Thanks to you now we will never know. The search for truth has been served, no? As for me I’ll take care to never encroach in your sandbox again….kind regards… s/unregistered IP person
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to
List of Family Guy characters. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the
sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you!
Demonuk (
talk)
06:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Taxin609. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Taxin609 (
Talk To Me)
21:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
interstatefive (
talk) - just another roadgeek
21:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio, you may be
blocked from editing.
interstatefive (
talk) - just another roadgeek
21:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Vernon Township, Scioto County, Ohio.
interstatefive (
talk) - just another roadgeek
21:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Porter Township, Scioto County, Ohio have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Dirkbb (
talk)
22:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |