Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Neil Gorsuch. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Favonian (
talk)
20:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ST47 (
talk)
20:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DannyS712. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Alec Baldwin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
DannyS712 (
talk)
02:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Betty White. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Everedux
(talk)
02:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Alec Baldwin, you may be
blocked from editing.
DannyS712 (
talk)
02:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Betty White.
Everedux
(talk)
02:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
02:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Rex Tillerson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
LizardJr8 (
talk)
02:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rex Tillerson. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
LizardJr8 (
talk)
02:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Rex Tillerson, you may be
blocked from editing.
Everedux
(talk)
02:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Rex Tillerson.
Everedux
(talk)
02:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Janet Jackson, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
LuK3
(Talk)
00:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Michael Douglas, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
LuK3
(Talk)
01:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk)
01:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Neil Gorsuch. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Favonian (
talk)
20:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
ST47 (
talk)
20:56, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DannyS712. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Alec Baldwin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
DannyS712 (
talk)
02:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Betty White. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Everedux
(talk)
02:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Alec Baldwin, you may be
blocked from editing.
DannyS712 (
talk)
02:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Betty White.
Everedux
(talk)
02:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
02:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Rex Tillerson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
LizardJr8 (
talk)
02:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rex Tillerson. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
LizardJr8 (
talk)
02:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Rex Tillerson, you may be
blocked from editing.
Everedux
(talk)
02:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Rex Tillerson.
Everedux
(talk)
02:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
MelanieN (
talk)
03:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Janet Jackson, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
LuK3
(Talk)
00:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Michael Douglas, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
LuK3
(Talk)
01:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk)
01:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |