Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Hello, 150.101.100.140, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Un sch ool 04:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey, regarding this edit of yours, I want to point out that you should generally give a reason for reverting another editor. You will note that, when I reverted you, back here, I left an edit summary with an explanation. My point, which I will repeat here, was that even if your statement is true, that isn't the place in the article for such a point in the article. It was a bit awkward there, but you can certainly place the information somewhere else, and it might work fine. Un sch ool 04:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jim1138. Your recent edit to
Franklin Mountains (Texas) appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jim1138 (
talk)
07:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Meters. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article,
Floodlight, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. That source is not appropriate. It is a promotional how-to from a manufacturer's site, and it does not support any of the claims in the sentence it is supposedly referencing.
Meters (
talk)
06:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed your series of edits to various Adelaide-based articles to add information concerning the tram extension. Thank you for your edits. However, I would like to direct you to WP:CITE listing the Wikipedia's citation policy. I would also recommend getting to know Template:Cite web, a template that enables users to easily include citation authors, origins of citations, and access dates for a more comprehensive citation listing in-article. Additionally, a more encyclopedic writing tone would be invaluable in your edits; for example, "the company responsible for construction has gone into voluntary administration" is far less ambiguous than "the company responsible for construction has a big problem now". Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 13:19, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
East Terrace, Adelaide, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is at least the sixth time you have used the same source to supposedly support claims that do not appear in that source (in
East Terrace, Adelaide,
Rundle Park, and
Grenfell Street, Adelaide. Read the links on your talk page and stop doing this.
Meters (
talk)
07:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
East Terrace, Adelaide. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your new sources still do not support the claim that there are multiple streets in the area that have been realigned because of this project. Discuss this on the talk page or leave it alone
Meters (
talk)
23:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rundle Park. Teh cites sources do not say that either park was to be closed permanently. "Cries" is not an encyclopedic term. The sources do not say that the protests resulted in saving the parks. Thy simply say that the design was modified to lessen the impact, and that a road which was to have been closed was retained.
Meters (
talk)
23:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Rundle Park. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
If you wan to mention the construction project in
East Terrace, Adelaide,
Rundle Park and
Grenfell Street, Adelaide then source it properly. Do not continue to make claims that are not supported by the sources you use.
Meters (
talk)
23:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi 150.101.100.140, most of us editing here on Wikipedia are complete history nerds and love old tram maps. What's getting your edits reverted is the way you're trying to force poor/vague wording into articles and making zero effort to engage constructively with other editors. Please either ask for help to make the content better quality - via the talk page or by editing constructively in the article space. The other thing is the #1 way to lose trust with other editors when adding content in good faith but that is not up to standard is to edit from an IP instead of named account. It would really help get this tram stuff up if you got a Wikipedia account. Donama ( talk) 03:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Adelaide Convention Centre, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You undid a bunch of copyediting, as well as reinserting the trivia about an incident of domestic violence which was incidental to where it had occurred. I have reverted to the copyedited version. If you wish to reinsert the incident of violence, please discuss on the talk page why you think it is relevant.
Scott Davis
Talk
08:12, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
El_C
05:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nigos. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Nigos (
t@lk •
Contribs)
05:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
All that is an aside. The totality of your edits were simply not up to par, sorry. El_C 06:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 07:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 06:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk)
02:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rundle Street, Adelaide. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Alex Cohn
(let's chat!)
06:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! This , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Hello, 150.101.100.140, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Un sch ool 04:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey, regarding this edit of yours, I want to point out that you should generally give a reason for reverting another editor. You will note that, when I reverted you, back here, I left an edit summary with an explanation. My point, which I will repeat here, was that even if your statement is true, that isn't the place in the article for such a point in the article. It was a bit awkward there, but you can certainly place the information somewhere else, and it might work fine. Un sch ool 04:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jim1138. Your recent edit to
Franklin Mountains (Texas) appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jim1138 (
talk)
07:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Meters. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article,
Floodlight, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. That source is not appropriate. It is a promotional how-to from a manufacturer's site, and it does not support any of the claims in the sentence it is supposedly referencing.
Meters (
talk)
06:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've noticed your series of edits to various Adelaide-based articles to add information concerning the tram extension. Thank you for your edits. However, I would like to direct you to WP:CITE listing the Wikipedia's citation policy. I would also recommend getting to know Template:Cite web, a template that enables users to easily include citation authors, origins of citations, and access dates for a more comprehensive citation listing in-article. Additionally, a more encyclopedic writing tone would be invaluable in your edits; for example, "the company responsible for construction has gone into voluntary administration" is far less ambiguous than "the company responsible for construction has a big problem now". Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 13:19, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
East Terrace, Adelaide, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is at least the sixth time you have used the same source to supposedly support claims that do not appear in that source (in
East Terrace, Adelaide,
Rundle Park, and
Grenfell Street, Adelaide. Read the links on your talk page and stop doing this.
Meters (
talk)
07:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
East Terrace, Adelaide. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your new sources still do not support the claim that there are multiple streets in the area that have been realigned because of this project. Discuss this on the talk page or leave it alone
Meters (
talk)
23:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rundle Park. Teh cites sources do not say that either park was to be closed permanently. "Cries" is not an encyclopedic term. The sources do not say that the protests resulted in saving the parks. Thy simply say that the design was modified to lessen the impact, and that a road which was to have been closed was retained.
Meters (
talk)
23:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Rundle Park. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.
If you wan to mention the construction project in
East Terrace, Adelaide,
Rundle Park and
Grenfell Street, Adelaide then source it properly. Do not continue to make claims that are not supported by the sources you use.
Meters (
talk)
23:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi 150.101.100.140, most of us editing here on Wikipedia are complete history nerds and love old tram maps. What's getting your edits reverted is the way you're trying to force poor/vague wording into articles and making zero effort to engage constructively with other editors. Please either ask for help to make the content better quality - via the talk page or by editing constructively in the article space. The other thing is the #1 way to lose trust with other editors when adding content in good faith but that is not up to standard is to edit from an IP instead of named account. It would really help get this tram stuff up if you got a Wikipedia account. Donama ( talk) 03:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Adelaide Convention Centre, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You undid a bunch of copyediting, as well as reinserting the trivia about an incident of domestic violence which was incidental to where it had occurred. I have reverted to the copyedited version. If you wish to reinsert the incident of violence, please discuss on the talk page why you think it is relevant.
Scott Davis
Talk
08:12, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
El_C
05:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nigos. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Nigos (
t@lk •
Contribs)
05:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
All that is an aside. The totality of your edits were simply not up to par, sorry. El_C 06:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 07:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 06:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk)
02:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Rundle Street, Adelaide. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Alex Cohn
(let's chat!)
06:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |