Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
User:Orderinchaos. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Euryalus
05:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
defamatory content, as you did to
Michael J. Todd, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
Warthog
Demon
01:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Clown has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Chasingsol
(talk)
03:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you.
HarlandQPitt (
talk)
06:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Vang Vieng appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Zachlipton (
talk)
05:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Vang Vieng, you may be
blocked from editing. Please stop. You are welcome to make constructive improvement to articles, but calling a place "disgusting" is not ok. Facts need to be backed by citations to reliable sources. Thanks.
Zachlipton (
talk)
05:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
06:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Wanted to let you know that there is a discussion regarding your edits to Vang Vieng at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Vang Vieng. Thank you. Zachlipton ( talk) 19:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Vang Vieng with
this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ankit Maity
Talk |
contribs
09:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Vang Vieng, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. You need to go on the
talk page and discuss this if you don't want to get blocked. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
23:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Beef, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Dawnseeker2000
22:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mr. Vernon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made to
Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
01:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Australia), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
I am One of Many (
talk)
06:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
143.188.101.65 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Philippus Baldaeus may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Tanning because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
02:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Eupatorieae. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Aurato (
talk)
04:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
God bless you have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
gobonobo
+
c
00:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Instant coffee seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Johnny Bravo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Shellwood (
talk)
02:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from
Vang Vieng without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Dan Koehl (
talk)
23:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Leyland brothers— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk or
my talk page. Thank you.
Orphan Wiki
20:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to
attack other editors, as you did on
User:Orderinchaos. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Euryalus
05:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
defamatory content, as you did to
Michael J. Todd, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
Warthog
Demon
01:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Clown has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Chasingsol
(talk)
03:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to
Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying
talk page. If you post your comments there, other
editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you.
HarlandQPitt (
talk)
06:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Vang Vieng appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Zachlipton (
talk)
05:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Vang Vieng, you may be
blocked from editing. Please stop. You are welcome to make constructive improvement to articles, but calling a place "disgusting" is not ok. Facts need to be backed by citations to reliable sources. Thanks.
Zachlipton (
talk)
05:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
06:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Wanted to let you know that there is a discussion regarding your edits to Vang Vieng at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Vang Vieng. Thank you. Zachlipton ( talk) 19:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Vang Vieng with
this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ankit Maity
Talk |
contribs
09:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Vang Vieng, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. You need to go on the
talk page and discuss this if you don't want to get blocked. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
23:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Beef, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Dawnseeker2000
22:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mr. Vernon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made to
Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
01:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Australia), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
I am One of Many (
talk)
06:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
143.188.101.65 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Philippus Baldaeus may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Tanning because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
02:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Eupatorieae. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Aurato (
talk)
04:48, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
God bless you have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
gobonobo
+
c
00:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Instant coffee seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
00:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Johnny Bravo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Shellwood (
talk)
02:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from
Vang Vieng without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Dan Koehl (
talk)
23:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Leyland brothers— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk or
my talk page. Thank you.
Orphan Wiki
20:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |