Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. I have also notified relevant administrators. Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺ 12:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺ 12:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Please refer to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#Formatting_of_seasonal_destinations. It's been agreed upon that Seasonal destinations are split into a separate line, so kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes that editors have done on the various Airport pages. 203.214.121.41 ( talk) 23:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Silchar Airport, you may be
blocked from editing.
Shovon (
talk)
09:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia policy regarding airline and airport articles says that "you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article". Please follow:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content and
Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Regular charter service with published schedules can be included in the articles. This is not against Wikipedia policy. You also have reverted the edits of native name of this airport without any valid reason. So kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes for vandalizing.
never stop flying (
talk)
18:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive edits of User: 124x247x221x146. Thank you. Hey Mid ( contributions) 13:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Toyotaboy95 (
talk)
01:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
RE my uw-3rr and the report at WP:ANI
I asked fellow admin MilborneOne to look over the situation. He is of the opinion that your editing is generally in good faith, but there are a few problems. Firstly, you need to use edit summaries to give some clue to other editors what changes you have made to the article. Secondly, the Wikipedia editing process is BRD - i.e. you make a bold edit to an article, another editor reverts it, then you discuss the issue on the article's talk page. The process is not BRRRRRRRRRRR...!
I'm sure that you don't want to get yourself blocked from editing. So, please slow down a little. If an edit you make gets reverted, please raise it on the talk page of the article in question and let the reverting editor know that you have done so. The merits of the change can then be discussed and maybe a compromise reached as to changes to the article. - Failure to discuss issues and further edit warring will result in you being blocked. Mjroots ( talk) 06:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen that you keep removing CMB as an IT destination out of BLR. FYI IT will be resuming flights to CMB from 31st Oct. pdf's or excel schedules are updated on a regular basis and are valuable sources of reference. The actual schedule that you are talking about also mentions a direct flight from BLR to CMB from 31st Oct. This flight is non-existent on 30th Oct. Here's the link, pls have a look at it then think whether you have to remove CMB from IT's destibation list. IT schedules ( Abhishek191288 ( talk) 13:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC))
124x247x221x146, I've blocked you for three hours for edit warring. In particular at Chennai International Airport, but I've seen similar behaviour at other airport articles.
I've opted for a short block, because I understand the frustration of dealing with ever-changing IP addresses, but edit warring is not the right way to solve the problem.
Once your block expires, what I'd like to see is:
There are mechanisms like RFPP that exist to help editors in situation like yours. But edit warring is not of them. Please don't do it.
Usual block notice: if you feel this block is unfair, you can request an {{
unblock}}
using:
{{unblock|replace this with your reason for being unblocked}}.
TFOWR 09:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia policy regarding airline and airport articles says that "you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article". Please follow:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content and
Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Regular charter service with published schedules can be included in the articles. This is not against Wikipedia policy. You also have reverted the edits of native name of this airport without any valid reason. So kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes for vandalizing.
never stop flying (
talk)
18:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop doing what you think is "right" and read WP:Airports and WP:Airlines before editing!! It's getting really tiring to constantly revert your edits that are nonsense. Could you also take the advice of the above users to talk on the talkpages of the relevant articles before getting involved in an edit war. Toyotaboy95 ( talk) 12:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Seduisant (
talk)
21:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
SpiceJet destinations. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
FisherQueen (
talk ·
contribs)
18:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Thank you.
Someone65 (
talk)
08:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. I have also notified relevant administrators. Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺ 12:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺ 12:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Please refer to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#Formatting_of_seasonal_destinations. It's been agreed upon that Seasonal destinations are split into a separate line, so kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes that editors have done on the various Airport pages. 203.214.121.41 ( talk) 23:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Silchar Airport, you may be
blocked from editing.
Shovon (
talk)
09:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia policy regarding airline and airport articles says that "you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article". Please follow:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content and
Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Regular charter service with published schedules can be included in the articles. This is not against Wikipedia policy. You also have reverted the edits of native name of this airport without any valid reason. So kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes for vandalizing.
never stop flying (
talk)
18:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive edits of User: 124x247x221x146. Thank you. Hey Mid ( contributions) 13:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Toyotaboy95 (
talk)
01:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
RE my uw-3rr and the report at WP:ANI
I asked fellow admin MilborneOne to look over the situation. He is of the opinion that your editing is generally in good faith, but there are a few problems. Firstly, you need to use edit summaries to give some clue to other editors what changes you have made to the article. Secondly, the Wikipedia editing process is BRD - i.e. you make a bold edit to an article, another editor reverts it, then you discuss the issue on the article's talk page. The process is not BRRRRRRRRRRR...!
I'm sure that you don't want to get yourself blocked from editing. So, please slow down a little. If an edit you make gets reverted, please raise it on the talk page of the article in question and let the reverting editor know that you have done so. The merits of the change can then be discussed and maybe a compromise reached as to changes to the article. - Failure to discuss issues and further edit warring will result in you being blocked. Mjroots ( talk) 06:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen that you keep removing CMB as an IT destination out of BLR. FYI IT will be resuming flights to CMB from 31st Oct. pdf's or excel schedules are updated on a regular basis and are valuable sources of reference. The actual schedule that you are talking about also mentions a direct flight from BLR to CMB from 31st Oct. This flight is non-existent on 30th Oct. Here's the link, pls have a look at it then think whether you have to remove CMB from IT's destibation list. IT schedules ( Abhishek191288 ( talk) 13:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC))
124x247x221x146, I've blocked you for three hours for edit warring. In particular at Chennai International Airport, but I've seen similar behaviour at other airport articles.
I've opted for a short block, because I understand the frustration of dealing with ever-changing IP addresses, but edit warring is not the right way to solve the problem.
Once your block expires, what I'd like to see is:
There are mechanisms like RFPP that exist to help editors in situation like yours. But edit warring is not of them. Please don't do it.
Usual block notice: if you feel this block is unfair, you can request an {{
unblock}}
using:
{{unblock|replace this with your reason for being unblocked}}.
TFOWR 09:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia policy regarding airline and airport articles says that "you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article". Please follow:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content and
Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Regular charter service with published schedules can be included in the articles. This is not against Wikipedia policy. You also have reverted the edits of native name of this airport without any valid reason. So kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes for vandalizing.
never stop flying (
talk)
18:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Please stop doing what you think is "right" and read WP:Airports and WP:Airlines before editing!! It's getting really tiring to constantly revert your edits that are nonsense. Could you also take the advice of the above users to talk on the talkpages of the relevant articles before getting involved in an edit war. Toyotaboy95 ( talk) 12:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Seduisant (
talk)
21:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
SpiceJet destinations. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
FisherQueen (
talk ·
contribs)
18:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Thank you.
Someone65 (
talk)
08:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)