Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Kennet Andersson. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Tomas e (
talk)
15:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Nordic race has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
Gage (
talk)
08:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop adding your assertion that members of the Nordic race have "relatively short arms". If you have a source for this claim, please provide it, but do not add it to the table, since this is a verbatim quotation from Ripley's The Races of Europe, which says no such thing. Paul B ( talk) 09:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to the page
Marfan syndrome. Such edits constitute
vandalism and are
reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Connormah (
talk)
05:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Your edits to this article have been reverted on multiple occasions by multiple editors. Either cite reliable references, or stop inserting this highly dubious information.
And please cease and desist from inserting the same text into the talk pages of everyone who reverts your edits. In this context is irrelevant nonsense.
Zzrbiker ( talk) 12:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
List of rail gauges. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
David Biddulph (
talk)
13:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
You've been reported for edit warring at WP:AN3#User:121.102.47.215 reported by User:Oknazevad (Result: ). If you respond there and promise to stop reverting, you may be able to avoid a block. EdJohnston ( talk) 14:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:121.102.47.215 reported by User:Oknazevad (Result: 31h). EdJohnston ( talk) 16:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are
not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you. –
Signalhead
< T >
13:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Other editors will sometimes make the effort to verify and find supporting sources after interesting facts are added to articles, but the author really should do it. Please get serious about helping the project! You are adding interesting unsourced facts to assorted rail articles at such a manic pace that the effect is disruptive.
After researching a sample of your new information, I'm inclined to revert the bulk of your writing on rail topics as not credible. Also, when you change the meaning of sourced text while leaving the existing citation in place, please explain why.
Prari (
talk)
14:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
This
was unhelpful and has been reverted. For your
previous edit to
British Rail Class 373, an interesting change to the power specification, you need to cite a
reliable source.
Prari (
talk)
19:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:High-speed rail, you will be
blocked for
vandalism. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
08:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to
Talk:High Speed 2, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Tmol42 (
talk)
15:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below; but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. --
Cirt (
talk)
17:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Kennet Andersson. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Tomas e (
talk)
15:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit that you made to the page
Nordic race has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the
sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.
Gage (
talk)
08:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please stop adding your assertion that members of the Nordic race have "relatively short arms". If you have a source for this claim, please provide it, but do not add it to the table, since this is a verbatim quotation from Ripley's The Races of Europe, which says no such thing. Paul B ( talk) 09:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to the page
Marfan syndrome. Such edits constitute
vandalism and are
reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the
sandbox for testing. Thank you.
Connormah (
talk)
05:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Your edits to this article have been reverted on multiple occasions by multiple editors. Either cite reliable references, or stop inserting this highly dubious information.
And please cease and desist from inserting the same text into the talk pages of everyone who reverts your edits. In this context is irrelevant nonsense.
Zzrbiker ( talk) 12:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
List of rail gauges. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing.
David Biddulph (
talk)
13:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
You've been reported for edit warring at WP:AN3#User:121.102.47.215 reported by User:Oknazevad (Result: ). If you respond there and promise to stop reverting, you may be able to avoid a block. EdJohnston ( talk) 14:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:121.102.47.215 reported by User:Oknazevad (Result: 31h). EdJohnston ( talk) 16:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are
not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you. –
Signalhead
< T >
13:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Other editors will sometimes make the effort to verify and find supporting sources after interesting facts are added to articles, but the author really should do it. Please get serious about helping the project! You are adding interesting unsourced facts to assorted rail articles at such a manic pace that the effect is disruptive.
After researching a sample of your new information, I'm inclined to revert the bulk of your writing on rail topics as not credible. Also, when you change the meaning of sourced text while leaving the existing citation in place, please explain why.
Prari (
talk)
14:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
This
was unhelpful and has been reverted. For your
previous edit to
British Rail Class 373, an interesting change to the power specification, you need to cite a
reliable source.
Prari (
talk)
19:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:High-speed rail, you will be
blocked for
vandalism. --
Eraserhead1 <
talk>
08:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to
Talk:High Speed 2, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Tmol42 (
talk)
15:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below; but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. --
Cirt (
talk)
17:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |