Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.
Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. ![]() |
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Satoshi Tajiri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 06:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
Chipped beef. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
10:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did with
this edit to
Chipped beef. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
10:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
United States Coast Guard.
Jim1138 (
talk)
09:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tapentadol. -
theWOLFchild
12:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Naloxone. -
theWOLFchild
12:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Bass Pro Shops, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. -
theWOLFchild
12:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! -
theWOLFchild
12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the
preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces
edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Of late, the person or persons editing with account have made numerous edits that were not in compliance with Wikipedia's standards, and it's Policies & Guidelines, specifically in regards to Reliable Sources and the Manual of Style. Please familiarize yourself with these guidelines before editing further. There is a great deal of useful information to assist you in the 'welcome' template above, in the numerous notices and warnings posted here as well as in the links in this comment. Know that competency is required to contribute to this project. A great deal of your edits have had to be reverted, causing work for others. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you will very likely be blocked from editing. Thank you - theWOLFchild 12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent changes to this article are yet another example of the problematic editing coming from this account. No edit summaries, obviously did not use the preview function, and the changes made did not serve as any kind of improvement, they instead needed to be corrected, again creating work for other editors. If this disruption continues, this account will be reported and very likely blocked from editing. Again, please follow the editing guidelines of this project. Thank you - theWOLFchild 02:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
That content was stated in the next paragraph. Please don't be repetitious. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 00:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
L293D. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Policy of deliberate ambiguity, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
L293D (
☎ •
✎)
02:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Is anyone able to procure and add data regarding the affinity of levomepromazine at its clinically significant target receptors?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 ( talk) 20:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
The "Outbreaks of Coronavirus Disease" section chart doesn't even have a total estimated infections column to give the number of deaths context which makes it relatively useless data and only causes panic in readers. I thank whoever flagged the "Cure" section as unrelated, however there are several treatments which may be beneficial in the treatment of many coronaviruses such as Remdesivir which has shown effectiveness against SARS, MERS, and covid-19. The "Cure" section should be renamed as "Treatments" or "Potential Treatments" and completely re-written to discuss the current treatment regimens that have shown reasonable effectiveness in Coronaviruses in general with anything related to Covid-19/SARS2 being purged from the page. In the interest of eliminating fear-mongering in this article I would recommend increased editing controls by the Wikipedia staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 ( talk) 00:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
"In our Solar System, the orbits about the Sun of all planets and most other objects, except many comets, are prograde, i.e. in the same direction as the Sun rotates. Except for Venus and Uranus, planetary rotations are also prograde." - This is a strongly misleading statement which will confuse most readers and result in incorrect interpretations.
I would suggest: "In our Solar System, the orbits about the Sun of most objects including all planets (except Venus and Uranus), are prograde, i.e. in the same direction as the Sun rotates.
I posted this but this article seems to be aggresively monitored and unedited so that required clarifications are immediately reversed... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 ( talk) 06:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ComplexRational. Your recent edit(s) to the page
Retrograde and prograde motion appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
ComplexRational (
talk)
11:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.
Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. ![]() |
|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Satoshi Tajiri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 06:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing
verifiable and
reliable sources, as you did with
this edit to
Chipped beef. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
10:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did with
this edit to
Chipped beef. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
10:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
United States Coast Guard.
Jim1138 (
talk)
09:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tapentadol. -
theWOLFchild
12:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Naloxone. -
theWOLFchild
12:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Bass Pro Shops, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. -
theWOLFchild
12:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! -
theWOLFchild
12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the
preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces
edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Of late, the person or persons editing with account have made numerous edits that were not in compliance with Wikipedia's standards, and it's Policies & Guidelines, specifically in regards to Reliable Sources and the Manual of Style. Please familiarize yourself with these guidelines before editing further. There is a great deal of useful information to assist you in the 'welcome' template above, in the numerous notices and warnings posted here as well as in the links in this comment. Know that competency is required to contribute to this project. A great deal of your edits have had to be reverted, causing work for others. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you will very likely be blocked from editing. Thank you - theWOLFchild 12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent changes to this article are yet another example of the problematic editing coming from this account. No edit summaries, obviously did not use the preview function, and the changes made did not serve as any kind of improvement, they instead needed to be corrected, again creating work for other editors. If this disruption continues, this account will be reported and very likely blocked from editing. Again, please follow the editing guidelines of this project. Thank you - theWOLFchild 02:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
That content was stated in the next paragraph. Please don't be repetitious. Thank you. Jim1138 ( talk) 00:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
L293D. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Policy of deliberate ambiguity, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
L293D (
☎ •
✎)
02:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Is anyone able to procure and add data regarding the affinity of levomepromazine at its clinically significant target receptors?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 ( talk) 20:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
The "Outbreaks of Coronavirus Disease" section chart doesn't even have a total estimated infections column to give the number of deaths context which makes it relatively useless data and only causes panic in readers. I thank whoever flagged the "Cure" section as unrelated, however there are several treatments which may be beneficial in the treatment of many coronaviruses such as Remdesivir which has shown effectiveness against SARS, MERS, and covid-19. The "Cure" section should be renamed as "Treatments" or "Potential Treatments" and completely re-written to discuss the current treatment regimens that have shown reasonable effectiveness in Coronaviruses in general with anything related to Covid-19/SARS2 being purged from the page. In the interest of eliminating fear-mongering in this article I would recommend increased editing controls by the Wikipedia staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 ( talk) 00:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
"In our Solar System, the orbits about the Sun of all planets and most other objects, except many comets, are prograde, i.e. in the same direction as the Sun rotates. Except for Venus and Uranus, planetary rotations are also prograde." - This is a strongly misleading statement which will confuse most readers and result in incorrect interpretations.
I would suggest: "In our Solar System, the orbits about the Sun of most objects including all planets (except Venus and Uranus), are prograde, i.e. in the same direction as the Sun rotates.
I posted this but this article seems to be aggresively monitored and unedited so that required clarifications are immediately reversed... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 ( talk) 06:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ComplexRational. Your recent edit(s) to the page
Retrograde and prograde motion appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
ComplexRational (
talk)
11:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |