Hi 星枢! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Megaman en m ( talk) 21:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Hangul, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
15:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Hangul, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
15:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Hangul, you may be
blocked from editing. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
17:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't know why you have retreated again. It's not my fault that you can't understand the Korean literature. I'm not suitable to add references to the article when correcting the wording errors of the paragraphs without references 星枢 ( talk) 18:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
I thought about it carefully, and I think that according to the requirements of the rules, as long as I guarantee that my editor has references, it is no problem. I don't need to add references that have nothing to do with my changes. My references have proved that the previous text is wrong. In the 15th century, Korean occasionally used ㅸ. Do you agree? If you don't object, I'll edit it. 星枢 ( talk) 18:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
OK, is this literature convincing enough? If you still don't agree, I will give up. https://mblogthumb-phinf.pstatic.net/20120504_193/veero_1336096447123eNYum_JPEG/blog_010.jpg?type=w420 星枢 ( talk) 19:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
AINH (
talk)
20:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Taiwan People's Party, you may be
blocked from editing.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
16:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Democratic Progressive Party—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Taiwan People's Party.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
15:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello 星枢! Your additions to
Polymarket have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Isabelle Belato
🏳🌈
13:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)星枢 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I had a dispute with another user, but I did not violate the editing rules of Wikipedia. ①The reason for my ban was an editing dispute regarding whether the Taiwan People's Party is a populist party. ②For each of my edits, I provided reasons such as, "The main point of this argument is not whether Ko is a populist politician (although I still don't think so), but whether the party is a populist political party, and there is no evidence or reference to prove this." ③The user I was in a dispute with provided some reference materials in the original version, but even if these references were completely accurate (which I don't believe), they could only identify the party's chairman as a populist figure, but they couldn't prove that the party itself is a populist party. Additionally, I provided reference materials to counter this viewpoint. ④Furthermore, my edits were based on the consensus of the Chinese Wikipedia and were not my personal unilateral judgments. ⑤It is worth noting that the user I had an editing dispute with strongly supports the opposing party of the Taiwan People's Party on the Chinese Wikipedia homepage, raising doubts about their editing motivations. ⑥In the future, instead of unilaterally changing the state of the article, I will submit it for community discussion to seek consensus. ⑦Based on the above reasons, I believe that the ban on my editing is unreasonable and I hope to receive prompt attention from the administrators. 星枢 ( talk) 16:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked from editing a single article out of the millions on Wikipedia, a block proportional to the need to prevent the disruption that you caused. You are completely free to edit the rest of the project; you haven't provided a reason as to why you need to urgently edit the single article that you are blocked from. Since you say you will submit changes for discussion to reach a consensus, I see no need to take action here. 331dot ( talk) 17:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
星枢 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Because I need to make edits in the talk section. Furthermore, I believe that disruption and controversy are different, and I have provided ample reasons. How can it be considered as disruption? My edits should not be assumed to be incorrect just because I have made fewer edits, leading to a decision to prohibit me from editing. 星枢 ( talk) 05:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As per below. Yamla ( talk) 12:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are free to edit the talk page. The block is only from the article itself, you are not blocked from the talk page. 331dot ( talk) 11:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi 星枢! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Megaman en m ( talk) 21:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Hangul, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
15:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Hangul, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
15:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Hangul, you may be
blocked from editing. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
17:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't know why you have retreated again. It's not my fault that you can't understand the Korean literature. I'm not suitable to add references to the article when correcting the wording errors of the paragraphs without references 星枢 ( talk) 18:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
I thought about it carefully, and I think that according to the requirements of the rules, as long as I guarantee that my editor has references, it is no problem. I don't need to add references that have nothing to do with my changes. My references have proved that the previous text is wrong. In the 15th century, Korean occasionally used ㅸ. Do you agree? If you don't object, I'll edit it. 星枢 ( talk) 18:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
OK, is this literature convincing enough? If you still don't agree, I will give up. https://mblogthumb-phinf.pstatic.net/20120504_193/veero_1336096447123eNYum_JPEG/blog_010.jpg?type=w420 星枢 ( talk) 19:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
AINH (
talk)
20:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Taiwan People's Party, you may be
blocked from editing.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
16:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Democratic Progressive Party—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Taiwan People's Party.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
15:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello 星枢! Your additions to
Polymarket have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Isabelle Belato
🏳🌈
13:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)星枢 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I had a dispute with another user, but I did not violate the editing rules of Wikipedia. ①The reason for my ban was an editing dispute regarding whether the Taiwan People's Party is a populist party. ②For each of my edits, I provided reasons such as, "The main point of this argument is not whether Ko is a populist politician (although I still don't think so), but whether the party is a populist political party, and there is no evidence or reference to prove this." ③The user I was in a dispute with provided some reference materials in the original version, but even if these references were completely accurate (which I don't believe), they could only identify the party's chairman as a populist figure, but they couldn't prove that the party itself is a populist party. Additionally, I provided reference materials to counter this viewpoint. ④Furthermore, my edits were based on the consensus of the Chinese Wikipedia and were not my personal unilateral judgments. ⑤It is worth noting that the user I had an editing dispute with strongly supports the opposing party of the Taiwan People's Party on the Chinese Wikipedia homepage, raising doubts about their editing motivations. ⑥In the future, instead of unilaterally changing the state of the article, I will submit it for community discussion to seek consensus. ⑦Based on the above reasons, I believe that the ban on my editing is unreasonable and I hope to receive prompt attention from the administrators. 星枢 ( talk) 16:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked from editing a single article out of the millions on Wikipedia, a block proportional to the need to prevent the disruption that you caused. You are completely free to edit the rest of the project; you haven't provided a reason as to why you need to urgently edit the single article that you are blocked from. Since you say you will submit changes for discussion to reach a consensus, I see no need to take action here. 331dot ( talk) 17:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
星枢 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Because I need to make edits in the talk section. Furthermore, I believe that disruption and controversy are different, and I have provided ample reasons. How can it be considered as disruption? My edits should not be assumed to be incorrect just because I have made fewer edits, leading to a decision to prohibit me from editing. 星枢 ( talk) 05:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As per below. Yamla ( talk) 12:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are free to edit the talk page. The block is only from the article itself, you are not blocked from the talk page. 331dot ( talk) 11:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)