| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The stuff you removed ( [1]) was swearing in Turkish. "Not land, you'll get arm sized dick". Thought you would want to know. Also why are you categorizing images from commons on en.wiki? (Your categorization is a bit controversial even if you did not intend this btw) -- Cat chi? 10:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
(unindent) It is really not important to me either way. Feel free to categorize the Kurdistan-related maps in whatever way you want. I was following the previous naming precedents in the related articles. I did not participate in those discussions. I was just categorizing maps. From Kurdistan (disambiguation): Kurdistan may refer to:
It seems that in English "Kurdistan" means the whole region. But I could be wrong. But I will not object to any categorization scheme you come up with concerning those maps. Just go ahead and do it.-- Timeshifter 13:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC) I just noticed this wikipedia category: Category:Kurdish inhabited regions. I have an idea...-- Timeshifter 13:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC) I emptied the "Maps of Kurdistan" category, and recategorized the maps to Category:Maps of Kurdish-inhabited regions. At least this way I am not inventing anything out of thin air; since there already existed Category:Kurdish inhabited regions.-- Timeshifter 14:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
(unindent) Maps have long been categorized in map categories. We now have commons:Category:Maps of Kurdish-inhabited regions and commons:Category:Maps of Iraqi Kurdistan. I moved the images in the commons "Maps of Kurdistan" category to those 2 categories. The news media today uses "Kurdistan" to refer to w:Iraqi Kurdistan. See this Sept. 2, 2007 Chicago Tribune article:
So I think this category breakdown is clearer for the average reader of wikipedia and the news. And it avoids the confusion surrounding the old and new meanings of Kurdistan. See the geography section of w:Kurdistan. I believe wikipedia is supposed to lean toward the common names today. -- Timeshifter 17:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
(unindent) There is no statement of endorsement. It is just a long-used, cross-border regional category. From the introduction of Category:Kurdistan that someone copied from the Kurdistan article:
Many category names cover controversial topics. There is no endorsement by wikipedia. Just like there is no endorsement implied by the names for many categories covering controversial issues. People have to read and make up their own minds. For example: and all the subcategories in the "by country" categories, etc. within these categories:
-- ChongDae 15:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:RefPTemplate:RefP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — — Jack · talk · 19:33, Thursday, 6 September 2007 19:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC) ![]() This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ah! My Goddess (TV) logo 1.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC) ![]() This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ah! My Goddess (TV) logo 2.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
The idea might have some merit. However, a WikiProject is probably not the best way to go. What we're probably talking about here would be something along the lines of policy, not project. As such, it would probably be best to propose it at the Wikipedia:Village pump, possibly as a suggested policy guideline, with a page written out describing what you think the actions, qualifications, and limitations of the group would be. Be aware that a lot of people would react negatively to anything they perceive as being "beauracracy creep", and that this has a real chance of becoming that. Alternately, you might contact the people at Wikimedia Commons about setting up such a group there, as all free images are allegedly being tried to be deposited there anyway. John Carter 15:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I was told to perhaps give the idea a second chance. What do you think? -- Cat chi? 17:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Our article on the Eiffel tower suggests that these images are not copyrighted in the United States Eiffel Tower#_note-15. These byzantine country-specific copyright laws are still confusing for me - could you explain exactly what are the relevant issues for photos of "copyrighted buildings" and Wikimedia commons? I need some help understanding this area. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 14:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm watching you. Ceiling Cat 09:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
You forgot about me? :) -- Cat chi? 16:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you please correct your signature so it isn't a double redirect? Ryan Postlethwaite 10:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I have closed the discussion and redirected all of the episodes, but not the "movie". Please accept this outcome. If you do find reasonable sources to establish notability of specific episodes you are of course free to resurrect those articles and add the sources. If you do so, please also work towards a less plot-summary, in-universe format. Thank you. -- Jack Merridew 09:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I have brought your signature up at AN/I for dicsussion, please feel free to comment there. Ryan Postlethwaite 10:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Please confirm you are the owner of is:Notandi:Tölva by replying to this message. -- 85.220.36.41 21:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC) I redirected pattern-avoiding permutations to pattern-avoiding permutation. A bot came along and "fixed" the double redirect, and I reverted, and then another bot, belonging to you, apparently, came along and "fixed" it again, and I reverted. The page titled pattern-avoiding permutation is labeled a "redirect with possibilities", using the standard template. If it ever becomes are article, it would be inappropriate for pattern-avoiding permutations to redirect to anything else. Michael Hardy 16:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading the images. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description pages and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 19:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
function wpTextboxReplace()
{
var str = prompt("Enter string to replace:", "");
if(str){
var repl = prompt("Replace \""+str+"\" with:", "");
if(!repl) return;
var txt = document.getElementById("wpTextbox1");
txt.value = txt.value.replace(str, repl);
}
}
addOnloadHook(function () {
if (document.forms.editform) {
addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:wpTextboxReplace()', 'Replace', 'ca-replace',
'Replace for the edit window');
}
});
Gracenotes T § 01:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Enjoy Ceiling Cat 17:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Hi White Cat, your bot has now been renamed in German Wikipedia to "User:Computer". Best regards, Jón + 19:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC) You just fixed double redirects on Dick Donato. However, the Dick Donato article is under deletion review and the consensus is leaning strongly for restoration. When it's restored, would you please undo your changes to the redirects? Thanks. Wryspy 17:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
(diff) (hist) . . mb "Evel" Dick Donato; 03:24 . . (+12) . . Computer (Talk | contribs) (Robot: Fixing double redirect) (diff) (hist) . . mb Evel Dick Donato; 03:24 . . (+12) . . Computer (Talk | contribs) (Robot: Fixing double redirect) (diff) (hist) . . mb Evel Dick; 03:24 . . (+12) . . Computer (Talk | contribs) (Robot: Fixing double redirect) Wryspy 19:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Would you care to explain what this is about? — [ aldebaer ] 08:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Ned Scott, do you think that maybe the edit summary you used when you nominated the article for deletion was highly inappropriate and added to the tension here? Newyorkbrad 09:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
To return to the original topic for a moment: I didn't know about your history with each other nor was I aware of the RfC. However, removing that comment wasn't the most diplomatic approach either. — [ aldebaer ] 15:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC) I've taken the disagreement between you and Ned Scott to requests for arbitration and you're named as a party. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 04:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC) You are aware that the articles have been mass blanked I hope. :) -- Cat chi? 19:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I have been having to revert a big flaming on the CC article as well by the way. --Dynamo_ace 10:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Greetings Cat! I couldn't help but notice from your user page that you "make tons of edits" to a number of language wikipedia's for which you don't seem to have knowledge of the language. Could you tell me how this works? The only reason I ask is that I think that wikipedia might be a good tool to learn new languages. Also, if you don't mind asking, what do you mean by that phrase at the top of your user page, the one that has aiur? Pocopocopocopoco 03:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Heh! :) -- Cat chi? 21:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you apply this change to all the articles? :) -- Cat chi? 10:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Sozu benim cevirdigim gibi yaz... -- Elmacenderesi E=mc2 21:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Please do not remove categories like this, thank you. -- Cat chi? 20:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The stuff you removed ( [1]) was swearing in Turkish. "Not land, you'll get arm sized dick". Thought you would want to know. Also why are you categorizing images from commons on en.wiki? (Your categorization is a bit controversial even if you did not intend this btw) -- Cat chi? 10:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
(unindent) It is really not important to me either way. Feel free to categorize the Kurdistan-related maps in whatever way you want. I was following the previous naming precedents in the related articles. I did not participate in those discussions. I was just categorizing maps. From Kurdistan (disambiguation): Kurdistan may refer to:
It seems that in English "Kurdistan" means the whole region. But I could be wrong. But I will not object to any categorization scheme you come up with concerning those maps. Just go ahead and do it.-- Timeshifter 13:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC) I just noticed this wikipedia category: Category:Kurdish inhabited regions. I have an idea...-- Timeshifter 13:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC) I emptied the "Maps of Kurdistan" category, and recategorized the maps to Category:Maps of Kurdish-inhabited regions. At least this way I am not inventing anything out of thin air; since there already existed Category:Kurdish inhabited regions.-- Timeshifter 14:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
(unindent) Maps have long been categorized in map categories. We now have commons:Category:Maps of Kurdish-inhabited regions and commons:Category:Maps of Iraqi Kurdistan. I moved the images in the commons "Maps of Kurdistan" category to those 2 categories. The news media today uses "Kurdistan" to refer to w:Iraqi Kurdistan. See this Sept. 2, 2007 Chicago Tribune article:
So I think this category breakdown is clearer for the average reader of wikipedia and the news. And it avoids the confusion surrounding the old and new meanings of Kurdistan. See the geography section of w:Kurdistan. I believe wikipedia is supposed to lean toward the common names today. -- Timeshifter 17:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
(unindent) There is no statement of endorsement. It is just a long-used, cross-border regional category. From the introduction of Category:Kurdistan that someone copied from the Kurdistan article:
Many category names cover controversial topics. There is no endorsement by wikipedia. Just like there is no endorsement implied by the names for many categories covering controversial issues. People have to read and make up their own minds. For example: and all the subcategories in the "by country" categories, etc. within these categories:
-- ChongDae 15:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:RefPTemplate:RefP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — — Jack · talk · 19:33, Thursday, 6 September 2007 19:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC) ![]() This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ah! My Goddess (TV) logo 1.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC) ![]() This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ah! My Goddess (TV) logo 2.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
The idea might have some merit. However, a WikiProject is probably not the best way to go. What we're probably talking about here would be something along the lines of policy, not project. As such, it would probably be best to propose it at the Wikipedia:Village pump, possibly as a suggested policy guideline, with a page written out describing what you think the actions, qualifications, and limitations of the group would be. Be aware that a lot of people would react negatively to anything they perceive as being "beauracracy creep", and that this has a real chance of becoming that. Alternately, you might contact the people at Wikimedia Commons about setting up such a group there, as all free images are allegedly being tried to be deposited there anyway. John Carter 15:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I was told to perhaps give the idea a second chance. What do you think? -- Cat chi? 17:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Our article on the Eiffel tower suggests that these images are not copyrighted in the United States Eiffel Tower#_note-15. These byzantine country-specific copyright laws are still confusing for me - could you explain exactly what are the relevant issues for photos of "copyrighted buildings" and Wikimedia commons? I need some help understanding this area. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 14:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm watching you. Ceiling Cat 09:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
You forgot about me? :) -- Cat chi? 16:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you please correct your signature so it isn't a double redirect? Ryan Postlethwaite 10:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I have closed the discussion and redirected all of the episodes, but not the "movie". Please accept this outcome. If you do find reasonable sources to establish notability of specific episodes you are of course free to resurrect those articles and add the sources. If you do so, please also work towards a less plot-summary, in-universe format. Thank you. -- Jack Merridew 09:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I have brought your signature up at AN/I for dicsussion, please feel free to comment there. Ryan Postlethwaite 10:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Please confirm you are the owner of is:Notandi:Tölva by replying to this message. -- 85.220.36.41 21:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC) I redirected pattern-avoiding permutations to pattern-avoiding permutation. A bot came along and "fixed" the double redirect, and I reverted, and then another bot, belonging to you, apparently, came along and "fixed" it again, and I reverted. The page titled pattern-avoiding permutation is labeled a "redirect with possibilities", using the standard template. If it ever becomes are article, it would be inappropriate for pattern-avoiding permutations to redirect to anything else. Michael Hardy 16:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading the images. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description pages and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 19:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
function wpTextboxReplace()
{
var str = prompt("Enter string to replace:", "");
if(str){
var repl = prompt("Replace \""+str+"\" with:", "");
if(!repl) return;
var txt = document.getElementById("wpTextbox1");
txt.value = txt.value.replace(str, repl);
}
}
addOnloadHook(function () {
if (document.forms.editform) {
addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:wpTextboxReplace()', 'Replace', 'ca-replace',
'Replace for the edit window');
}
});
Gracenotes T § 01:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Enjoy Ceiling Cat 17:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Hi White Cat, your bot has now been renamed in German Wikipedia to "User:Computer". Best regards, Jón + 19:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC) You just fixed double redirects on Dick Donato. However, the Dick Donato article is under deletion review and the consensus is leaning strongly for restoration. When it's restored, would you please undo your changes to the redirects? Thanks. Wryspy 17:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
(diff) (hist) . . mb "Evel" Dick Donato; 03:24 . . (+12) . . Computer (Talk | contribs) (Robot: Fixing double redirect) (diff) (hist) . . mb Evel Dick Donato; 03:24 . . (+12) . . Computer (Talk | contribs) (Robot: Fixing double redirect) (diff) (hist) . . mb Evel Dick; 03:24 . . (+12) . . Computer (Talk | contribs) (Robot: Fixing double redirect) Wryspy 19:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Would you care to explain what this is about? — [ aldebaer ] 08:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Ned Scott, do you think that maybe the edit summary you used when you nominated the article for deletion was highly inappropriate and added to the tension here? Newyorkbrad 09:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
To return to the original topic for a moment: I didn't know about your history with each other nor was I aware of the RfC. However, removing that comment wasn't the most diplomatic approach either. — [ aldebaer ] 15:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC) I've taken the disagreement between you and Ned Scott to requests for arbitration and you're named as a party. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 04:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC) You are aware that the articles have been mass blanked I hope. :) -- Cat chi? 19:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I have been having to revert a big flaming on the CC article as well by the way. --Dynamo_ace 10:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Greetings Cat! I couldn't help but notice from your user page that you "make tons of edits" to a number of language wikipedia's for which you don't seem to have knowledge of the language. Could you tell me how this works? The only reason I ask is that I think that wikipedia might be a good tool to learn new languages. Also, if you don't mind asking, what do you mean by that phrase at the top of your user page, the one that has aiur? Pocopocopocopoco 03:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Heh! :) -- Cat chi? 21:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you apply this change to all the articles? :) -- Cat chi? 10:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Sozu benim cevirdigim gibi yaz... -- Elmacenderesi E=mc2 21:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC) Please do not remove categories like this, thank you. -- Cat chi? 20:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
|